모든 템플릿

POC-to-Purchase Conversion & Decision Driver Survey

Captures structured buyer feedback after a proof-of-concept engagement to identify which POC elements, activities, and decision drivers most influence purchase conversion and win rates.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 25개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome, and thank you for participating in this survey about your proof-of-concept (POC) experience. This survey takes approximately 7–9 minutes to complete. Your responses will help us understand what works well in our POC process and where we can improve. Please note: • There are no right or wrong answers — we value your honest opinions. • Participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. • Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. By continuing, you agree to participate in this survey.

Q02
드롭다운

Which best describes your current stage with our product?

  • Completed POC and purchased
  • Completed POC; decision pending
  • Completed POC and did not purchase
  • POC in progress
  • Planning a POC
  • Evaluated without a POC
  • Exploratory only
Q03
객관식

Which of the following activities were included in your POC? (Select all that apply)

  • Joint kickoff and success plan
  • Connection to sample or production data
  • Custom demo or prototype
  • Hands-on pilot with end users
  • Performance or load testing
  • Security or compliance review
  • ROI or business value modeling
  • Executive readout
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
의견 척도

Overall, how successful was the POC in meeting your stated goals?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all successful최대:Extremely successful
Q05
장문형

Based on your experience, what one change would have most improved the likelihood of conversion from this POC?

Q06
드롭다운

What is your primary role?

  • Executive/VP
  • Director
  • Manager
  • Individual contributor
  • Consultant/Advisor
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q07
메시지

Thank you for your time — your feedback will directly help us improve future POC experiences. Your responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate.

Q08
드롭다운

What was your primary role in this POC?

  • Decision maker
  • Evaluator/Influencer
  • Project sponsor
  • Technical lead/Engineer
  • Procurement/Legal
  • End user
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
의견 척도

How would you rate the quality of the kickoff planning and success criteria definition?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q10
의견 척도

Based on your POC experience so far, how likely is your organization to move forward with a purchase?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q11
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your POC experience in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q12
드롭다운

What is your organization's industry?

  • Technology/Software
  • Financial services
  • Healthcare
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail/CPG
  • Telecom/Media
  • Public sector/Nonprofit
  • Education
  • Energy/Utilities
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

What was the primary goal of your POC? (Select one)

  • Validate technical fit and integration
  • Prove priority use cases
  • Assess performance at scale
  • Validate security and compliance
  • Evaluate usability and end-user adoption
  • Quantify ROI or business value
  • Other (please specify)
Q14
의견 척도

How would you rate the quality of data and environment access provided during the POC?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q15
객관식

What is the current status of your purchase decision following the POC?

  • Purchased
  • Purchase planned (within 3 months)
  • Deferred (more than 3 months)
  • Still evaluating
  • Did not move forward
Q16
드롭다운

Approximately how many employees are in your organization?

  • 1–49
  • 50–249
  • 250–999
  • 1,000–4,999
  • 5,000+
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
장문형

In one sentence, how did you define POC success?

Q18
의견 척도

How would you rate the quality of technical support and responsiveness during the POC?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q19
순위 매기기

Rank the following decision drivers by their influence on your POC outcome. (Drag to reorder; 1 = most influential)

  1. Technical fit
  2. Time to value
  3. Ease of integration
  4. Security and compliance confidence
  5. Total cost of ownership
  6. Vendor responsiveness and support
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q20
드롭다운

Where is your organization primarily headquartered?

  • North America
  • Latin America
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
의견 척도

How would you rate the quality of documentation and enablement resources provided?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q22
객관식

Which, if any, barriers made the POC harder to complete or convert? (Select all that apply)

  • Limited access to data or systems
  • Unrealistic scope or timeline
  • Environment setup complexity
  • Internal resourcing constraints
  • Stakeholder misalignment
  • Pricing or budget constraints
  • Security/legal review delays
  • Feature gaps
  • Performance or reliability issues
  • Value not sufficiently demonstrated
  • Other (please specify)
  • None of the above
Q23
드롭다운

Approximately how many weeks did (or will) the POC run?

  • Less than 1 week
  • 1–2 weeks
  • 3–4 weeks
  • 5–8 weeks
  • 9–12 weeks
  • More than 12 weeks
  • Not sure
Q24
객관식

What is your most likely next step following this POC? (Select one)

  • Expand pilot or user rollout
  • Finalize budget
  • Validate additional features
  • Proceed to legal/procurement
  • Build internal business case
  • No next step planned
  • Other (please specify)
Q25
드롭다운

Approximately how many business days passed before you observed first meaningful value from the POC?

  • Same day
  • 1–3 days
  • 4–7 days
  • 8–14 days
  • 15–30 days
  • More than 30 days
  • Have not yet observed meaningful value
  • Not sure

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines structured quantitative questions (POC stage, role, activities, quality ratings, timeline, purchase status) with an open-ended AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind survey answers
  • Includes a ranking question specifically for decision drivers so responses show relative influence on POC outcomes, not just isolated ratings
  • Captures both process quality signals (kickoff planning, data/environment access, technical support, documentation) and outcome signals (success rating, purchase likelihood, next steps) in one flow
  • Ends with an AI-moderated deeper interview plus firmographic screening (role, industry, size, HQ location) so conversion drivers can be segmented and explained, not just counted

SurveyMonkey

Home Buyer Feedback Survey Template

This is a static, ready-to-field template for capturing feedback after a home purchase, not a POC-to-purchase or B2B decision-driver survey. It's conceptually adjacent as a post-transaction buyer feedback form, but the question set and audience are built for real estate, not software POC evaluation. No mechanism exists for ranking decision drivers or probing why a deal converted or stalled.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template with pre-built buyer feedback questions
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and reporting tools
  • Familiar format for respondents used to standard post-purchase surveys

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up to probe individual buyer reasoning
  • No ranking mechanism for weighing multiple decision drivers against each other
  • Not designed for B2B/POC conversion contexts (kickoff quality, technical support, environment access, etc.)

SurveySparrow

NPS Key Drivers Survey Template

A fielding-ready template focused on identifying key drivers behind an NPS score, which overlaps conceptually with our decision-driver ranking but is scoped to relationship/loyalty scoring rather than a specific POC-to-purchase conversion journey. It's a good fit for general driver analysis but doesn't map to POC-specific stages like kickoff quality, activities included, or barriers to conversion.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built around identifying and quantifying key drivers of a satisfaction metric
  • Ready-to-use template within SurveySparrow's broader survey and reporting platform
  • Likely includes standard NPS scoring and follow-up open text for driver context

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to dig into why a specific driver mattered most
  • Not structured around the POC lifecycle (goals, activities, timeline, barriers, next steps)
  • No transparent, publishable methodology for how driver rankings or scores are derived

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.