모든 템플릿

Vendor Security Questionnaire Workload & Automation Survey

Assess the workload burden, pain points, and automation readiness of teams handling vendor security questionnaires. Designed for security, GRC, procurement, and IT professionals to inform process improvement priorities.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 26개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Thank you for participating in this survey about vendor security questionnaire processes. Your responses will help us understand current workload patterns and identify where automation could have the greatest impact. Participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest experience. All responses will be kept confidential and reported only in aggregate. The survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete.

Q02
객관식

Which best describes your involvement with vendor security questionnaires?

  • We send questionnaires to vendors
  • We respond to customer security questionnaires
  • Both sending and responding
  • Neither / Not applicable
Q03
의견 척도

How would you rate the overall workload burden of vendor security questionnaires on you and your team?

척도: 17
최소:Very light burden최대:Very heavy burden
Q04
객관식

Which tools or approaches does your team currently use to streamline vendor security questionnaires? (Select all that apply.)

  • VRM platform (third-party risk tool)
  • AI-assisted answer suggestions
  • Answer library / knowledge base
  • Workflow or ticketing system
  • Intake or request portal
  • Macros, templates, or playbooks
  • Other (please specify)
  • None of the above
Q05
객관식

Which performance metrics does your team currently track for vendor security questionnaires? (Select all that apply.)

  • Cycle time (request to completion)
  • Touch time (active work hours)
  • Rework or clarification rate
  • SLA adherence
  • Vendor response quality
  • Volume throughput
  • Backlog / queue size
  • Other (please specify)
  • None / Not sure
Q06
의견 척도

How willing are you to participate in piloting new questionnaire automation tools in the next quarter?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all willing최대:Extremely willing
Q07
객관식

What is your primary role?

  • Security / GRC / Risk
  • IT / Infrastructure
  • Procurement / Sourcing
  • Legal / Privacy
  • Sales / Account Management
  • Operations / PMO
  • Executive / Leadership
  • Other (please specify)
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your input will directly inform how we prioritize improvements to our vendor security questionnaire processes.

Q09
객관식

Which internal functions do you collaborate with on vendor security questionnaires? (Select all that apply.)

  • Security / GRC
  • IT / Infrastructure
  • Procurement / Sourcing
  • Legal
  • Privacy
  • Finance
  • Sales / Account teams
  • Other internal partners
  • None / Not applicable
Q10
의견 척도

How much does gathering evidence and supporting documentation contribute to your questionnaire workload?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all최대:A great deal
Q11
객관식

What are your biggest concerns about increasing automation of vendor security questionnaires? (Select all that apply.)

  • Inaccuracy or hallucinations
  • Data leakage or confidentiality risks
  • Compliance or regulatory risk
  • Explainability / traceability of answers
  • Model or content maintenance burden
  • User adoption and change management
  • Cost vs. benefit
  • Other (please specify)
Q12
드롭다운

What is your team's target turnaround time for completing a standard vendor security questionnaire?

  • No target set
  • 1–3 business days
  • 4–5 business days
  • 6–10 business days
  • 11–15 business days
  • 16–20 business days
  • More than 20 business days
Q13
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, what would make automation of vendor security questionnaires most valuable for your team?

Q14
객관식

How many years have you worked with vendor security questionnaires?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q15
드롭다운

Approximately how many vendor security questionnaires did you handle in the last 3 months?

  • 0 (none)
  • 1–5
  • 6–15
  • 16–30
  • 31–50
  • 51–100
  • More than 100
Q16
의견 척도

How much does coordinating with internal subject-matter experts contribute to your questionnaire workload?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all최대:A great deal
Q17
순위 매기기

Rank the following automation opportunities by priority for your team, with the top item being the highest priority.

  1. Automated evidence and document collection
  2. Auto-mapping and de-duplication of questions
  3. Answer library with versioning and governance
  4. Vendor portal with status tracking and collaboration
  5. Risk scoring or control gap suggestions
  6. Contract and security clause extraction and linkage
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q18
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore a few of your responses in more depth. An AI moderator will ask up to 2 follow-up questions based on your answers.

Q19
객관식

Which region do you primarily work in?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Other / Multiple regions
Q20
드롭다운

On average, approximately how many questions does a typical vendor security questionnaire contain?

  • Fewer than 25
  • 25–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–200
  • 201–500
  • More than 500
  • Not sure
Q21
의견 척도

How much do redundant or overlapping questions across different questionnaires contribute to your workload?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all최대:A great deal
Q22
객관식

What is the minimum level of accuracy you would require from AI-generated draft answers before human review?

  • Below 60% — any draft is better than starting from scratch
  • 60–69% — a rough starting point is acceptable
  • 70–79% — most content should be usable
  • 80–89% — only minor edits needed
  • 90–95% — nearly final quality expected
  • Above 95% — only trivial corrections acceptable
Q23
드롭다운

On average, how many total person-hours are spent completing a single questionnaire across all contributors?

  • Less than 1 hour
  • 1–2 hours
  • 3–5 hours
  • 6–10 hours
  • 11–20 hours
  • 21–40 hours
  • More than 40 hours
  • Not sure
Q24
의견 척도

How much does manual formatting, copy-pasting, or document assembly contribute to your questionnaire workload?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all최대:A great deal
Q25
의견 척도

How much do ambiguous or poorly worded questions from requestors contribute to your questionnaire workload?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all최대:A great deal
Q26
의견 척도

How much does tracking status and following up across stakeholders contribute to your questionnaire workload?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all최대:A great deal

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a static vendor security questionnaire by directly measuring the workload burden and root causes (evidence gathering, SME coordination, redundant questions, manual formatting, ambiguous wording, status tracking) via a dedicated opinion-scale battery.
  • Includes a ranking exercise on automation opportunities plus multiple-choice questions on automation concerns and the minimum accuracy bar respondents require from AI-drafted answers — data no generic assessment template captures.
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to probe respondents' open-ended input in depth, surfacing nuance that fixed-choice workload surveys miss.
  • Segments results by role, tenure, and region, and closes with an auto-generated report, making it a ready-to-field diagnostic rather than just a static questionnaire document.

QuestionPro

Vendor Security and Assessment Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a vendor-facing security assessment questionnaire (the checklist used to evaluate a vendor's controls), not a survey of internal teams about the workload and automation readiness of running that process. It's a static, fielding-ready form for a different purpose than ours, though it shares the same subject-matter domain.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use library template within a broad survey platform
  • Structured around standard vendor risk/control categories
  • Likely customizable question set for different assessment scopes

아쉬운 점

  • A fixed questionnaire with no adaptive AI follow-up probing
  • No mechanism to measure or diagnose internal team workload/pain points
  • No published methodology for how questions were derived or scored

SurveySparrow

Vendor Security Assessment Questionnaire Template

Also a vendor-assessment questionnaire template (evaluating a vendor's security posture) rather than a survey measuring the workload burden and automation readiness of the teams who process these questionnaires. Presented as a conversational-style static template, not a workload diagnostic instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational/chat-style UI for form completion
  • Pre-built template reduces setup time for basic vendor assessments
  • Fits within a broader survey/CX platform with reporting

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning
  • Not designed to quantify internal process pain points, effort hours, or automation priorities
  • No transparent scoring/quality methodology disclosed

Jotform

Cyber Security Risk Assessment Questionnaire Form Template

A general cybersecurity risk assessment form, broader than and different from a vendor-specific questionnaire, and it is a data-collection form rather than a survey studying the workload or automation-readiness of teams handling such questionnaires. Best viewed as a form-builder template, not a comparable research instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Flexible drag-and-drop form builder for custom risk checklists
  • Broad applicability across general cyber risk use cases
  • Easy integration with Jotform's form ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive interviewing or voice AI component
  • Not focused on vendor questionnaire workload, pain points, or automation prioritization
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.