모든 템플릿

Resort Stay Experience Evaluation Survey

Captures how guests rate every stage of a resort stay — booking, check-in, rooms, amenities, staff, and value — and benchmarks loyalty with a recommendation score. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moments that drove each guest's score, surfacing what turned a detractor sour or what would push a passive guest into a promoter. Built for resort GMs and hospitality research teams.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for staying with us! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. We'd love your honest feedback on your recent visit — it takes about 5 minutes and helps us shape what we improve next.

Q02
객관식필수

What was the primary purpose of your stay?

  • Leisure/vacation
  • Business
  • Special occasion (wedding, honeymoon, anniversary)
  • Family visit
  • Other
Q03
숫자필수

How many nights did you stay at the resort?

Q04
매트릭스필수

Please rate the following aspects of your stay.

7개 행 × 5개 열
  • Check-in / check-out process
  • Room cleanliness
  • Room comfort
  • Resort grounds and facilities
  • Dining options
  • 외 2개
: Poor · Fair · Good · Very Good · Excellent
Q05
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this resort to a friend or colleague?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q06
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the specific moments behind the respondent's recommendation score: which part of the stay (arrival, room, dining, staff interaction, an incident) most shaped how they feel. If the score is 6 or below, probe exactly what went wrong and whether it was resolved on-site. If the score is high, probe which single moment they'd point to as the highlight. End by asking what one change would have raised their score.

Q07
객관식

Which of these amenities did you use during your stay?

  • Pool
  • Spa
  • Fitness center
  • Golf course
  • Kids' club
  • Restaurants or bars
  • Beach access
Q08
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)

When choosing a resort, rank how much each factor matters to you.

  • Location
  • Price/value
  • Room quality
  • Amenities and activities
  • Dining options
  • Customer service
  • Family-friendliness
  • Sustainability practices
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q09
장문형

What's one thing we could improve about your stay?

Q10
객관식

Who did you travel with on this trip?

  • Solo
  • Partner/spouse
  • Family with children
  • Friends group
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

Which age group do you belong to?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses go directly into a report our team uses to improve the resort for future guests.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Covers the full guest journey in one flow — booking, check-in, rooms, amenities, staff, and value — via a matrix rating question, not a single overall score
  • Pairs a recommendation (NPS-style) opinion scale with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moments behind each guest's score, distinguishing detractors from near-promoters
  • Includes a MaxDiff ranking of what factors matter most when choosing a resort, giving GMs weighted priorities rather than just satisfaction ratings
  • Captures trip context (purpose of stay, travel companions, age group, amenities used) so low scores can be segmented and explained rather than left as a flat number

QuestionPro

Resort Evaluation Survey Template

This is a directly comparable, fielding-ready resort evaluation template covering similar guest-experience touchpoints. It relies on standard closed-ended question types for scoring but, based on the product, does not offer adaptive AI-led follow-up interviews or voice-based interviewing. Reporting is likely dashboard/analytics-based rather than an AI-generated narrative report tied to individual respondent moments.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built resort evaluation template, so questions are pre-mapped to hospitality touchpoints
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type and distribution support
  • Likely offers standard analytics/dashboarding for aggregate score tracking

아쉬운 점

  • No indication of adaptive AI follow-up interviews to probe why a specific guest gave their score
  • No voice AI interview option for guests to explain feedback conversationally
  • No published transparent prompt methodology, since scoring/reporting is not AI-interview based

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.