Customer Needs Discovery & Prioritization Survey
Uncovers what customers are actually trying to accomplish, which needs matter most, and where your product or service currently falls short — with an AI follow-up that digs into the single biggest unmet need instead of settling for a generic complaint. Built for product, CX, and research teams planning roadmaps around real customer priorities.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which best describes what you're mainly trying to accomplish when you use (Replace with your product/service name)? (Template note: replace with your top 4-6 primary use cases before launching.)
- (Replace with use case A)
- (Replace with use case B)
- (Replace with use case C)
- (Replace with use case D)
- Something else
For each set, tell us which need matters most to you and which matters least when choosing a solution like ours.
- (Replace with need 1, e.g. Fast turnaround/response time)
- (Replace with need 2, e.g. Reliable, error-free results)
- (Replace with need 3, e.g. Affordable pricing)
- (Replace with need 4, e.g. Easy to learn and use)
- (Replace with need 5, e.g. Flexible/customizable to my situation)
- (Replace with need 6, e.g. Responsive human support)
- (Replace with need 7, e.g. Integrates with my other tools)
How well does (Replace with your product/service name) currently meet each of these needs?
- (Replace with need 1)
- (Replace with need 2)
- (Replace with need 3)
- (Replace with need 4)
- (Replace with need 5)
- 외 2개
Overall, how well does what we offer today match what you actually need?
In the last 30 days, has there been a need related to (Replace with your category, e.g. this type of product/service) that went unmet by any solution you tried, including ours?
- Yes, more than once
- Yes, once
- No, not that I noticed
Identify the single biggest unmet or partially-met need from this respondent's answers (prioritize anything they rated 'Not met at all' or 'Somewhat met' on a need they said matters most, or the 30-day unmet-need incident if mentioned). Ask them to walk through a specific recent moment where that need showed up, what they tried instead, what it cost them (time, money, frustration), and what a truly satisfying fix would look like. If they say everything is fine, probe what would make them switch to a competitor anyway.
If you were choosing a solution again today, rank these options in the order you'd consider them. (Template note: replace with your product and 2-4 real alternatives, including 'build it myself' or 'do nothing' if relevant.)
- (Replace with your product/service)
- (Replace with competitor A)
- (Replace with competitor B)
- Do nothing / handle it manually
Is there a need you have today that no solution — ours or anyone else's — fully addresses? Describe it in your own words.
Just a couple of quick optional questions to help us understand who's answering.
Which best describes your role?
- Individual contributor / end user
- Team lead / manager
- Director / senior leadership
- Owner / executive
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been a customer?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-12 months
- 1-3 years
- More than 3 years
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you for the thoughtful answers. Your responses feed directly into our roadmap so we can prioritize the needs that matter most and close the gaps you flagged.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that automatically probes the single biggest unmet or partially-met need surfaced by each respondent's answers, instead of stopping at a generic satisfaction score
- Combines quantitative prioritization (MaxDiff trade-offs, a needs-fit matrix, an overall opinion scale, and a re-choice ranking exercise) with open-ended and adaptive follow-up questions in one flow
- Segments responses by role and tenure so product, CX, and research teams can see which needs matter most to which customer groups
- Auto-generates a report from the responses, including the AI-identified unmet need, so roadmap prioritization doesn't require manual coding of open-text answers
Jotform
Customer Needs Survey Form TemplateA fielding-ready static form covering general customer needs questions, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize and embed but relies on fixed question sets rather than any adaptive logic. Good for quick, low-cost data collection rather than deep prioritization analysis.
잘하는 점
- Simple drag-and-drop customization
- Easy embedding/sharing via Jotform's form infrastructure
- Low barrier to entry for quick deployment
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into unmet needs
- No built-in prioritization method like MaxDiff or ranking trade-offs
- No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis
SurveySparrow
Customer Needs Survey TemplateA conversational-style survey template that presents questions one at a time for a chat-like feel. It's a ready-to-field template aimed at marketing teams, but the conversational format is scripted rather than truly adaptive to each respondent's answers.
잘하는 점
- Conversational one-question-at-a-time UI improves completion feel
- Positioned for marketing teams gathering customer input
- Ready-to-use template requiring minimal setup
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interviewing that branches based on the specific unmet need mentioned
- No voice interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No transparent, published prompt methodology or automated quality scoring
Typeform
Customer Needs Survey TemplateA polished, fielding-ready form using Typeform's signature conversational single-question layout. It's well suited for basic needs capture but, like other form builders, uses pre-set question logic rather than AI-driven follow-up.
잘하는 점
- Clean, high-completion conversational form design
- Established template library and branding polish
- Simple logic-jump customization for basic branching
아쉬운 점
- No AI-driven follow-up interview to isolate the single biggest unmet need
- No structured trade-off prioritization method (e.g., MaxDiff) included by default
- No automated report generation tied to response quality scoring
QuestionPro
Service Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is primarily a service-evaluation questionnaire and sample-question guide rather than a dedicated needs-discovery-and-prioritization template, so it's a partial comparison at best. It offers a static, comprehensive question bank but isn't structured around uncovering and ranking unmet needs.
잘하는 점
- Broad library of pre-written service evaluation questions
- Established survey platform with reporting/analytics tools
- Useful as a reference guide for question wording
아쉬운 점
- Focused on service evaluation, not needs discovery or prioritization trade-offs
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview capability
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.