QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Diversity Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether diversity training changes real workplace behavior, not just satisfaction — covering relevance, confidence applying concepts, and inclusion climate. An AI follow-up interview digs into a specific moment participants applied (or struggled to apply) what they learned, for L&D and DEI teams evaluating training impact.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the diversity training you attended. Your honest feedback shapes how we run future sessions — this will take about 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Which format best describes the diversity training you attended?

  • Live in-person session
  • Live virtual session
  • Self-paced online module
  • Blended (self-paced plus live discussion)
  • Not sure
Q03
의견 척도필수

How relevant was the training content to situations you actually encounter at work?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not relevant at all최대:Extremely relevant
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about the training?

4개 행 × 5개 열
  • The facilitator(s) were knowledgeable and credible
  • I felt safe asking questions or sharing concerns
  • The examples used reflected real situations at our company
  • The pace allowed time to actually absorb the material
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
의견 척도필수

How confident are you in applying what you learned the next time a related situation comes up at work?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not confident at all최대:Extremely confident
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)

Across the topics covered, which were most and least valuable to you personally?

  • Recognizing unconscious bias
  • Inclusive communication and language
  • Being an active ally to colleagues
  • Addressing microaggressions in the moment
  • Equitable hiring and promotion practices
  • Understanding company policies on discrimination
  • Navigating disagreement across different backgrounds
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most valuable최악:Least valuable
Q07
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often have you noticed yourself doing something differently because of the training (e.g., rephrasing a comment, speaking up, changing a process)?

  • Not at all
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Regularly, it's become a habit
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Get the respondent to walk through one specific, recent moment where they tried to apply something from the training — what the situation was, what they did or said, and how it landed. If they said they haven't applied anything, probe what got in the way (forgot, unclear how, felt awkward, no opportunity) and what would have made it easier to act on in real time.

Q09
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this training to a colleague in a similar role?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q10
장문형

What's one change that would make future diversity training sessions more useful for you or your team?

Q11
객관식

Which best describes your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Senior leader / executive
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-9 years
  • 10+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thank you for sharing your perspective! Responses are combined into an anonymized report used to improve upcoming diversity training sessions — individual answers are never shared with your manager.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond satisfaction scores to test real behavior change with a direct question on what respondents have actually done differently in the last 30 days
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through one specific, recent moment where they tried to apply the training, surfacing concrete evidence instead of vague self-ratings
  • Uses a max-diff exercise to pinpoint which specific training topics were most and least valuable, giving L&D/DEI teams prioritized, actionable feedback rather than a single average score
  • Pairs a relevance and confidence rating with a matrix of agreement statements and role/tenure segmentation, so results can be broken down by who found the training most applicable

SurveySparrow

Diversity Training Survey Template

A ready-to-field template specifically aimed at diversity training feedback, so it's directly comparable in subject matter. It appears to rely on standard rating and open-text questions rather than any adaptive interviewing to probe how training translated into behavior. Good for quick satisfaction pulses but likely thinner on behavior-change evidence.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for diversity training rather than generic training feedback
  • Likely quick to deploy with SurveySparrow's conversational form format
  • Probably includes standard satisfaction and relevance rating questions

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific applied moment — likely fixed questions for every respondent
  • No visible mechanism for automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published methodology on how questions were chosen or scored

Jotform

Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form Template

A general-purpose training evaluation form, not specific to diversity training, so it would need heavy customization to match this use case. It's a static form builder template focused on form fields and layout rather than interview-style probing. Useful for basic post-training feedback collection at low complexity.

잘하는 점

  • Simple, familiar form format that's easy to customize and embed
  • Broadly applicable to many training types, not locked to one topic
  • Fast to set up for teams wanting basic post-training feedback

아쉬운 점

  • Generic training template, not tailored to diversity/inclusion-specific behavior change
  • Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up questioning based on a respondent's answer
  • No automated scoring or auto-generated analysis report of responses

QuestionPro

Training Effectiveness Survey Questions | Post-Training Evaluation Sample Template

This page reads more like a sample question bank and guide for post-training evaluation than a single fielding-ready diversity training survey. It covers general training effectiveness concepts (relevance, satisfaction, application) applicable across training types, but isn't diversity-training-specific. Useful as reference material for building a survey manually rather than a plug-and-play instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Broad library of sample training-effectiveness questions to draw from
  • Covers general evaluation concepts like relevance, satisfaction, and application
  • Comes from an established survey platform with wider survey-logic features

아쉬운 점

  • Presented as a sample question guide rather than a ready-to-launch diversity training template
  • No adaptive AI interview to probe a specific real-world application moment
  • No automated quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology described

Typeform

Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form Template

A generic training effectiveness form, not specific to diversity training, built on Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time interface. It's a static template with fixed questions and no adaptive branching based on what a respondent actually experienced. Works well for lightweight, polished feedback collection but not for deep behavioral follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-at-a-time question flow that's pleasant to complete
  • Easy to customize branding and question wording
  • Widely used platform with solid basic analytics dashboards

아쉬운 점

  • Not diversity-training specific and lacks any behavior-change-focused questions like recent-application frequency
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore a specific moment of applying training
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated effectiveness report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기