모든 템플릿

Procurement Request & Approval Cycle Assessment

Diagnoses bottlenecks, clarity gaps, and cycle-time issues across procurement request and approval workflows. Designed for internal operations teams seeking data-driven improvements to purchasing processes based on employee feedback.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 20개 · 약 9분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Procurement Request & Approval Process Survey. This survey asks about your recent experience submitting or approving procurement requests. Your feedback will help us identify bottlenecks and improve our procurement workflows. • Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers—we want your honest experience. • All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. • Estimated completion time: 10 minutes. Please proceed when you are ready.

Q02
드롭다운

How often do you typically submit or approve procurement requests?

  • Daily
  • Weekly
  • Monthly
  • Less than monthly
  • Rarely/Never
Q03
의견 척도

In the past 30 days, how clear were the requirements for submitting a procurement request?

척도: 17
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q04
객관식

Which stages most often caused delays for you in the past 30 days? Select all that apply.

  • Gathering specifications or requirements
  • Vendor selection/quotes
  • Budget or finance review
  • Compliance or legal review
  • Manager/functional approval
  • PO creation or system entry
  • System or tool issues
  • None/No delays
  • Not applicable
Q05
장문형

Are there any instructions or guidelines you found unclear or difficult to locate? If so, please describe.

Q06
드롭다운

Which department or function best describes your role?

  • Procurement
  • Finance
  • Legal/Compliance
  • IT
  • Engineering
  • Marketing
  • Sales
  • Operations
  • HR
  • Other
Q07
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will be used to identify and address bottlenecks in our procurement process. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only.

Q08
객관식

How many procurement requests did you submit in the past 90 days?

  • 0
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11 or more
Q09
의견 척도

In the past 30 days, how satisfied were you with the time it took from submission to final approval?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q10
순위 매기기

Rank the following improvements by how much they would speed up your procurement approvals (1 = greatest impact).

  1. Clearer request guidelines and examples
  2. Fewer approval layers
  3. Faster response SLAs from reviewers
  4. More intuitive submission tool
  5. Pre-approved vendor lists
  6. Proactive status notifications
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q11
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore your procurement experience in a bit more detail. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions.

Q12
드롭다운

What is your seniority level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Director or above
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
의견 척도

In the past 30 days, how easy was it to find the documentation and guidelines needed to complete a procurement request?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q14
드롭다운

What is your preferred channel for submitting procurement requests?

  • Procurement portal
  • Ticketing system
  • Email
  • Chat tool/assistant
  • Other
Q15
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about the procurement request and approval process.

Q16
드롭다운

How long have you been in your current role?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
의견 척도

In the past 30 days, how responsive were the approvers or reviewers involved in your procurement requests?

척도: 17
최소:Very unresponsive최대:Very responsive
Q18
드롭다운

Where is your primary work location?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
의견 척도

In the past 30 days, how easy was the procurement submission tool or system to use?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q20
드롭다운

In the past 30 days, approximately how many business days did a typical approval take from submission to completion?

  • Less than 1 day
  • 1–2 days
  • 3–5 days
  • 6–10 days
  • 11–15 days
  • More than 15 days
  • Not sure

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines quantitative diagnostics (opinion-scale ratings on requirement clarity, approval speed, tool usability, and approver responsiveness) with a dedicated multiple-choice question isolating exactly which stages caused delays in the past 30 days.
  • Includes a ranking question so respondents prioritize which fixes would most reduce cycle time, giving ops teams a data-driven improvement backlog rather than just satisfaction scores.
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview segment that probes deeper into each respondent's procurement experience beyond fixed-choice answers, plus open-text fields for unclear guidelines and general feedback.
  • Captures role, seniority, tenure, and location dropdowns so bottleneck patterns can be segmented by department or level, and closes with an auto-generated report workflow — none of which static request forms provide.

Jotform

Field Trip Approval Request Form Template

This is a static intake/approval form for school field trips, not a procurement process or a diagnostic survey — the domain and purpose differ substantially from a procurement bottleneck assessment. It's useful only as a reference point for how Jotform structures generic request-approval forms.

잘하는 점

  • Drag-and-drop form builder with quick customization
  • Mobile-friendly submission and approval routing
  • Large template library for simple request/approval workflows

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — it's a fixed-field form
  • Not built for cycle-time or clarity diagnostics, and has no procurement-specific content
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

SurveySparrow

Overtime Request Form Template

This template is designed for employee overtime requests, an HR workflow rather than procurement, so it's not directly comparable in subject matter, though it shares the general 'request/approval process' category. It appears to be a conversational-style static form rather than a bottleneck-diagnostic instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-like survey UI for better completion rates
  • Positioned within a broader employee-experience survey suite
  • Supports multi-channel distribution

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option for deeper probing
  • Not tailored to procurement stages, delays, or approval-cycle diagnostics
  • No transparent scoring methodology or automated report generation evident

Typeform

Employee Time Off Request Form Template

A polished conversational form for time-off requests, again an HR use case rather than procurement approval-cycle diagnostics. It's a fielding-ready request form, not a process-assessment survey with cycle-time or delay-cause analysis.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, on-brand conversational question flow
  • Simple one-question-at-a-time UX known to reduce drop-off
  • Easy embedding into existing employee portals

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up probing into individual pain points
  • No procurement-specific bottleneck, delay-stage, or ranking questions
  • No built-in automated quality scoring or AI-generated diagnostic report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.