QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

360 Communication Skills Feedback Survey

Gathers manager, peer, and direct-report perspectives on how clearly, openly, and effectively someone communicates day to day. Combines a behavior-frequency rating battery with a best-worst skill-priority exercise and an AI follow-up interview that surfaces a concrete recent example behind the respondent's lowest rating, turning vague impressions into specific, coachable feedback.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 11개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking part in this communication skills review. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest, specific feedback helps a colleague grow — your responses will be shared in a summarized, de-identified form. It takes about 6 minutes. (Template note: insert the reviewee's name wherever you see 'this person' before launching, or use a merge tag if your platform supports it.)

Q02
객관식필수

What is your working relationship to the person you're giving feedback on?

  • I manage this person
  • This person manages me
  • Peer / same level
  • I'm on a different team but collaborate with them
  • Self-assessment
Q03
매트릭스필수

In the last 3 months, how often has this person done each of the following?

6개 행 × 4개 열
  • Explains ideas and decisions clearly, without needing repeated clarification
  • Listens actively and lets others finish before responding
  • Gives feedback that is specific and actionable
  • Adjusts their communication style for different audiences
  • Responds to messages and requests in a timely way
  • 외 1개
열: Rarely · Sometimes · Usually · Almost Always
Q04
의견 척도필수

Overall, how effective is this person's communication in their current role?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all effective최대:Extremely effective
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which communication skills would be most valuable for this person to develop further?

  • Active listening
  • Clarity and conciseness
  • Public speaking and presentations
  • Written communication (email, docs)
  • Giving constructive feedback
  • Receiving feedback openly
  • Adapting message to different audiences
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most important to develop최악:Least important to develop
Q06
장문형필수

Describe one specific, recent example (last 60 days) where this person's communication worked well or fell short. Include roughly what was said or written, and what happened as a result.

Q07
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to walk through the specific example they just described in more detail: what exactly was communicated, how the recipient(s) reacted, and what a stronger version of that message would have looked like. Cross-reference their rating-scale answers — if they marked any behavior as 'Rarely,' probe whether that reflects a one-off incident or a consistent pattern and ask for a distinct recent instance. If the respondent struggles to recall specifics, ask them to describe the last team meeting or written update this person led instead.

Q08
객관식

Would you recommend this person for a role that requires regularly communicating with senior leadership or external clients?

  • Yes, without hesitation
  • Yes, with some coaching first
  • Not yet
  • Unsure / not enough exposure
Q09
객관식

How long have you worked directly with this person?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6-12 months
  • 1-2 years
  • More than 2 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
객관식

Which best describes your team or function? (Replace with your organization's actual department list before launching.)

  • Engineering / Product
  • Sales / Business Development
  • Marketing
  • Operations
  • Customer Support
  • People / HR
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
메시지

That's everything — thank you for the thoughtful feedback. Responses across all reviewers will be combined into a summarized report to support this person's development, without attributing individual comments to you.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Built specifically for 360-degree feedback: a relationship question captures whether the rater is a manager, peer, or direct report, and reporting can be viewed across all three groups rather than as one generic self- or manager-only assessment.
  • Pairs a behavior-frequency matrix (how often specific communication behaviors occur) with a best-worst (max-diff) skill-priority exercise, so results show both current frequency and where development effort should focus.
  • An AI follow-up interview automatically probes the specific recent example behind the respondent's lowest rating, turning a vague low score into a concrete, coachable story instead of leaving it as an unexplained number.
  • Every response is automatically quality-scored and rolled into an auto-generated report, with transparent prompts showing exactly what the AI asked and why.

SurveySparrow

Communication Skills Assessment Questionnaire Template

A ready-to-use, fielding-ready template for assessing an individual's communication skills, built on SurveySparrow's conversational-form format. It appears designed around fixed rating-style questions rather than a structured multi-rater (manager/peer/direct-report) 360 design, and there's no indication it distinguishes rater relationship or aggregates across perspectives. Good for a quick, single-pass assessment rather than a layered 360 exercise.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI that's easy to customize and brand
  • Ready to deploy immediately without building a survey from scratch
  • Part of a broader survey platform with standard distribution and reporting tools

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific example behind a low rating — responses stay at the rating level
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
  • No visible best-worst/max-diff prioritization exercise or explicit 360 (manager/peer/direct-report) structuring

Typeform

Communication Style Survey Form

A clean, fielding-ready form focused on communication style/preferences, likely aimed at self-assessment or team-building rather than 360-style feedback from managers, peers, and direct reports. It's built on Typeform's well-known conversational UX but reads as a static question set rather than one that adapts to a respondent's specific answers. Useful for a lighter-touch style snapshot, not a coaching-grade feedback exercise.

잘하는 점

  • Highly polished, mobile-friendly conversational form experience
  • Simple to customize question wording and branching logic for basic paths
  • Fast to set up and share as a standalone survey

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to surface a concrete recent example behind any rating
  • No behavior-frequency matrix or max-diff skill-priority exercise — appears limited to style/preference questions
  • No automated quality scoring, transparent prompt disclosure, or auto-generated coaching report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기