Movie Viewing Habits & Platform Preferences Survey
Tracks how often people watch movies, which formats and platforms they use, and what drives their viewing choices — built for studios, streaming services, and theater chains. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the decision journey behind a respondent's most recent movie, surfacing friction points closed questions miss.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last 30 days, how often did you watch a movie (in a theater or at home)?
- Not at all
- 1-2 times
- 3-5 times
- 6-10 times
- More than 10 times
Which formats have you used to watch movies in the last 3 months?
- Movie theater
- Streaming subscription service (e.g. Netflix, Max)
- Digital rental or purchase (e.g. Prime Video, Apple TV)
- Physical media (DVD/Blu-ray)
- Free ad-supported streaming (e.g. Tubi, Pluto TV)
- Broadcast or cable TV
Rank these factors by how much they influence which movie you choose to watch, from most to least influential.
- Reviews and critic ratings
- Genre
- Cast or director
- Trailer
- Recommendation from friends or family
- Personalized algorithm recommendation
- Price or availability
When choosing a streaming service or theater, which of these matter most versus least to you?
- Price or subscription value
- Variety of available content
- Exclusive or original movies
- Ease of navigating the app or site
- Quality of personalized recommendations
- Video and audio quality
- Ability to download and watch offline
- Minimal or no ads
How satisfied were you with the last movie-watching experience you had, overall?
How likely are you to recommend the platform or theater you use most for movies to a friend?
Walk the respondent through the last movie they watched: how they decided on it, what almost made them pick something else or give up, and whether the actual experience matched what they expected going in. If they mentioned low satisfaction or switching formats/platforms often, dig into the specific moment things went wrong (buffering, price, bad recommendation, etc.) and what would have fixed it.
Thinking about a typical month, how would you split $100 of entertainment spending across these categories?
- Movie theater tickets
- Streaming subscriptions
- Digital rental or purchase
- Physical media
- Other entertainment
In the last 12 months, how many times have you gone to a movie theater?
- Never
- 1-2 times
- 3-5 times
- 6-10 times
- More than 10 times
Just two quick optional questions to help us understand who's answering — feel free to skip either.
Which age range do you fall into?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
All done — thank you! Your answers will feed into a report on evolving movie-viewing habits and platform preferences.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the decision journey behind a respondent's most recent movie, surfacing friction points that closed-ended questions miss
- Combines quantitative measures (ranking, max-diff, constant-sum budget split, opinion scales) with an open-ended AI interview for context on satisfaction and likelihood to recommend
- Covers both frequency/format habits and platform-choice drivers in one flow, with optional demographic questions kept separate and clearly marked optional
- Ends with an automated report, so studios, streaming services, and theater chains get synthesized findings rather than raw response dumps
SurveyMonkey
Movie Survey TemplateA fielding-ready static template covering general movie/TV viewing habits, built on SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure. It relies on standard closed-ended question types rather than any adaptive follow-up. Good for quick benchmarking but not for probing individual decision journeys.
잘하는 점
- Established, widely-used survey platform with broad distribution options
- Ready-to-use template requiring no custom setup
- Likely supports standard analytics/charting for closed-ended responses
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a respondent chose a specific movie or platform
- No published methodology or prompt transparency since questions are fixed, not AI-generated
- No automated qualitative synthesis — reporting is limited to standard chart/tabulation output
SurveySparrow
Movie Survey Template | Gather Audience Feedback EasilyA conversational-style static template for gathering movie/TV viewing feedback, filed under SurveySparrow's events category. It emphasizes a chat-like respondent experience but the questions themselves are pre-set rather than adaptively generated. Suitable for quick audience pulse checks rather than deep decision-journey research.
잘하는 점
- Conversational UI style may improve completion rates versus traditional form layouts
- Ready-to-field template with no build time needed
- Positioned for audience feedback, which fits general viewing-habit questions
아쉬운 점
- Chat-like interface simulates conversation but doesn't adapt questions based on prior answers
- No AI-driven follow-up interview or voice interview option
- No per-response quality scoring or automated analytical report generation
QuestionPro
Movie rental survey questions + sample questionnaire templateThis is a narrower questionnaire focused specifically on movie rental behavior rather than broader viewing habits and platform preferences across theater and streaming. It reads as a sample template/question bank rather than a fully tailored, ready-to-field survey for studios or streaming services. Useful as a question-writing reference but limited in scope for modern multi-platform viewing research.
잘하는 점
- Focused specifically on rental-related questions, which could suit niche rental-business use cases
- Presented as a sample questionnaire, giving question-writing guidance
- Part of a broader established survey-template library
아쉬운 점
- Scope is centered on rental rather than the full theater/streaming/format landscape
- No adaptive AI interview to explore the reasoning behind a respondent's last viewing choice
- No automated report generation or per-response quality scoring built into the template
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.