모든 템플릿

New Product Market Demand & Pricing Study

A flexible market study for testing demand, pricing, and competitive positioning for a new or improved product/service. Covers current alternatives, feature priorities, price sensitivity, and purchase intent, with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the real reasons behind stated purchase likelihood and price reactions.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking part in this market study! We're trying to understand how people like you currently solve a problem, what you'd pay for a better solution, and what would make you switch. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. It's about 8 minutes, and there are no wrong answers.

Q02
객관식필수

Which of the following best describes how you currently address (Replace with the need or problem area, e.g. 'tracking business expenses')?

  • A dedicated product or service built for this
  • A workaround using tools not built for this (e.g. spreadsheets)
  • I pay someone else to handle it for me
  • I don't currently address this at all
Q03
단문형

What specific product, service, or brand do you use most for this today, if any? (Template note: adjust this question if your category has no obvious 'current solution', e.g. brand-new markets.)

Q04
의견 척도필수

Thinking about your current solution, how well does it meet your needs?

척도: 17
최소:Falls very short of my needs최대:Fully meets my needs
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these matter most, and least, when you're choosing a solution in this space?

  • (Replace with feature/benefit A, e.g. 'Lower price')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit B, e.g. 'Faster setup')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit C, e.g. 'Better customer support')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit D, e.g. 'More reliable performance')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit E, e.g. 'Easier to use')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit F, e.g. 'Strong brand reputation')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit G, e.g. 'Works with tools I already use')
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most to me최악:Matters least to me
Q06
가격 민감도(Van Westendorp)필수

Pricing questions for (Replace with product/service name)

  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) to be priced so low that you'd question its quality?
  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) to be a bargain — a great value for the money?
  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) starting to get expensive, though you'd still consider it?
  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) too expensive to consider buying?
Q07
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to try (Replace with product/service name) once it's available?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's purchase-likelihood score. If they scored high, find out what specifically convinced them and whether that holds up against their current solution and the prices they gave earlier. If they scored low or moderate, dig into the exact hesitation — is it price, trust, switching effort, or lack of a compelling reason to change — and ask what single change would move them higher. Reference the feature they ranked as mattering most and check whether the concept actually delivers on it.

Q09
매트릭스필수

How important is each of the following when you decide whether to buy a product or service like this?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • Price
  • Quality or reliability
  • Brand reputation
  • Customer support
  • Ease of use
  • 외 1개
: Not important · Slightly important · Important · Very important · Critical
Q10
객관식

Which of the following brands have you heard of? (Template note: replace with your actual competitor set before launching.)

  • (Replace with competitor A)
  • (Replace with competitor B)
  • (Replace with competitor C)
  • (Replace with competitor D)
Q11
객관식

Where would you prefer to purchase (Replace with product/service category)?

  • Directly from the brand's website
  • A physical retail store
  • An online marketplace (e.g. Amazon)
  • Through a sales representative
  • Through a partner or reseller
Q12
객관식

Which age range are you in?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

Which best describes your annual household income? (Template note: swap for company size/revenue if this is a B2B study.)

  • Under $30,000
  • $30,000-$59,999
  • $60,000-$99,999
  • $100,000-$149,999
  • $150,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your responses will be combined with others to shape pricing, positioning, and product decisions. Individual answers are never shared on their own.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a single price question with a full Van Westendorp pricing set alongside a purchase-intent scale, so you get both the 'right price' range and stated likelihood to buy.
  • Pairs a MaxDiff feature-priority exercise and an importance matrix so you know which product attributes actually drive the buy decision, not just which features people like.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes why someone gave the purchase-likelihood score they did — surfacing real objections or triggers that a static price/intent question can't capture.
  • Covers the full decision context in one flow — current alternatives, brand awareness, purchase channel preference, and demographics — so pricing and demand findings can be segmented immediately.

SurveyMonkey

Market Research Product Survey Questions

A fielding-ready template for general product market research, likely covering awareness, usage, and satisfaction-style questions. It's a solid generalist starting point but is not built specifically around pricing sensitivity or new-product demand testing. Question set is presumably static and requires manual editing to fit a specific product concept.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use template backed by an established survey platform
  • Broad applicability across many product categories
  • Simple to launch quickly for general feedback

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents can't be probed further on their answers
  • No dedicated pricing methodology like Van Westendorp or price-sensitivity trade-off questions apparent from the title
  • No transparent, auto-generated per-response quality scoring or published prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Product-Market Fit Survey Template

A standard PMF survey template, likely centered on the classic 'how disappointed would you be' fit question and related satisfaction/usage items. It's oriented toward validating fit for an existing product rather than testing pricing and demand for a new concept. Appears to be a fixed-question template rather than an adaptive interview.

잘하는 점

  • Focused specifically on product-market fit measurement
  • Likely quick to deploy with a conversational survey UI
  • Good for existing-product validation use cases

아쉬운 점

  • No visible pricing-sensitivity instrument (e.g., Van Westendorp) for new-product pricing studies
  • Static question flow — no AI-driven follow-up to dig into the 'why' behind fit or price reactions
  • No mention of automated quality scoring or transparent AI methodology

Typeform

Product-Market Fit (PMF) Survey Template

Typeform's PMF template offers a polished, conversational question flow typical of the platform, aimed at gauging how essential a product feels to current users. It's a fixed-form template best suited to validating an existing product's fit, not to competitive pricing or new-product demand testing. No adaptive questioning is indicated.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, conversational form design typical of Typeform
  • Purpose-built for the well-known PMF survey framework
  • Easy to customize branding and basic question wording

아쉬운 점

  • No apparent pricing or willingness-to-pay questions for new-product demand testing
  • No adaptive AI interview to explore reasoning behind responses — all questions are pre-set
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt transparency

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.