Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Design & Creative Feedback Review
Structured stakeholder or customer feedback on a design, mockup, or creative asset: first impressions, a click on what draws attention, ratings against the brief, and file upload for marked-up versions. The AI interviewer converts 'I just don't like it' into usable direction.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 9개 · 약 6분
Q02
객관식필수
What's your relationship to this project?
- I requested this work
- Stakeholder in the outcome
- Fellow designer
- Target customer or user
Q03
단문형필수
First impression: without overthinking, what three words describe this design?
Q04
의견 척도필수
How clearly does the design communicate its main message?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:I can't tell what it's saying최대:Instantly clear
Q05
의견 척도필수
How well does it fit the brand as you understand it?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Off-brand최대:Perfectly on-brand
Q06
객관식필수
What should happen with this design?
- Ship it as is
- Ship with minor tweaks
- Needs another iteration
- Wrong direction — rethink
Q07
AI 인터뷰
Turn the reviewer's reaction into actionable direction: which specific element drove their overall verdict, what they would change FIRST and what that change accomplishes, what must NOT change, and whether their concerns are about craft (execution) or strategy (the idea itself). If they said 'wrong direction,' probe what the right direction solves that this one doesn't.
Q08
질문
Optional: upload a marked-up version, reference example, or anything that shows what you mean.
Q09
메시지
Feedback delivered — thank you! Everything is compiled into a single themed summary for the design team, with disagreements surfaced instead of averaged away.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Converts 'I just don't like it' into direction: the AI separates craft critiques from strategy critiques and asks what must NOT change
- Captures reviewer role and gut-reaction words before ratings, so you can weight feedback by stakeholder type
- Marked-up file uploads and a ship/iterate/rethink verdict give the design team an actionable decision, not a score
- Disagreements between reviewers are surfaced in the summary instead of averaged away
Jotform
Creative Design Feedback Survey Form TemplateA clean design-feedback form that captures reviewer identity/role, a star rating for visual appeal, a design-aspect evaluation matrix, and open-ended liked/improve/comments fields plus a follow-up flag. Strong for standardized, consistent stakeholder input, but it is a one-shot form with no way to review the actual artifact interactively or probe vague feedback.
잘하는 점
- Captures reviewer name, email, and project-relationship role to contextualize each response
- Mixes quantitative (star rating for visual appeal, design-aspect matrix, satisfaction scale) with qualitative open-text
- Structured 'most liked / suggested improvements / additional comments' fields keep feedback actionable
- Follow-up discussion status field to route responses that need a conversation
아쉬운 점
- Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up when a reviewer says something is 'off' but not why
- No mechanism to present/annotate the actual design artifact inside the flow; it references the work by name only
- No voice option for reviewers to talk through their reaction
- No auto-synthesized report aggregating and theming feedback across reviewers
Ziflow
Design Feedback Template (Creative Review & Approval)A structured creative-review template with a creative-brief header, review criteria (visual, functionality, content, brand alignment), works-well/improve/suggestions sections, action items assigned to people, and a four-level approval status. Strong on driving specific, decision-oriented feedback and formal approval, but as a blog template it standardizes fields rather than offering adaptive interviewing or in-app markup.
잘하는 점
- Creative-brief header ties feedback back to project goals for context
- Explicit review criteria across visual elements, functionality/UX, content accuracy, and brand alignment
- Action-items section assigning specific tasks to named individuals
- Four-level approval status (approved / minor changes / major revisions / rejected) with next steps and deadlines
아쉬운 점
- Standardized fields only; no AI that asks a reviewer a targeted follow-up on a specific critique
- The template itself is a document structure, not an environment where reviewers annotate the live artifact
- No voice modality for stakeholders to narrate their reaction
- No automated roll-up of multi-reviewer feedback into a synthesized report
Asana
Creative Asset Feedback and Approval TemplateA workflow-oriented template that moves assets through review stages (in production, ready for review, needs changes, approved) with criterion-level feedback, version control, due dates, and a recommended 3-5 reviewer set spanning design/brand/compliance. Strong on process, revision tracking, and approval routing, but feedback is comment fields on tasks rather than an interviewed, synthesized understanding of reviewer reasoning.
잘하는 점
- Kanban-style review stages (in production, ready for review, needs changes, approved) for clear status
- Criterion-level feedback sections plus creative-brief reference for context
- Version control guidance so reviewers always evaluate the latest asset
- Recommends 3-5 reviewers covering design, brand, and compliance perspectives
아쉬운 점
- Feedback is free-text comments on tasks; no AI follow-up to clarify or deepen a vague note
- No voice-AI interview for stakeholders to talk through their review
- No in-flow presentation of the artifact with adaptive questioning; it manages the asset, reviewers open files separately
- No auto-generated synthesis of what reviewers collectively want changed
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.