모든 템플릿

Innovation Idea Submission Experience Survey

Captures how easy, motivating, and fair the idea submission process felt to someone who just submitted an idea to your innovation program — covering guideline clarity, form usability, and intent to submit again. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the actual idea's context and the friction that almost stopped them from submitting, giving program owners concrete fixes instead of a generic satisfaction score.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for submitting an idea to (Replace with your innovation program name)! We'd love to hear how the submission process went for you — this takes about 5 minutes and helps us make it easier for the next person with a good idea. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized.

Q02
객관식필수

What mainly prompted you to submit this idea?

  • I spotted a recurring problem I wanted fixed
  • A specific event or incident triggered it
  • I was encouraged by a manager or colleague
  • I saw a challenge/campaign asking for ideas
  • I've had this idea for a while and finally had time
  • Other
Q03
객관식필수

Which best describes the type of idea you submitted?

  • Process or efficiency improvement
  • New product or feature idea
  • Cost-saving opportunity
  • Customer or employee experience fix
  • Safety, quality, or compliance issue
  • Other
Q04
의견 척도필수

Overall, how easy was it to actually submit your idea (finding the form, understanding what to fill in, completing it)?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q05
평점 척도필수

How clear were the instructions on what makes a strong submission (what to include, level of detail expected)?

범위: 15
최소:Not clear at all최대:Extremely clear
Q06
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your submission experience?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • The submission form asked for the right amount of information
  • I felt confident my idea would be reviewed fairly
  • I understood what would happen to my idea after submitting
  • I knew who to contact with questions
  • The time it took to submit matched what I expected going in
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the specific problem or opportunity behind this respondent's idea — what triggered it and who else it affects — and identify the single biggest moment of friction or hesitation during submission (a confusing field, uncertainty about ownership/credit, fear of a bad reaction, technical glitch, etc.). If they say the process was smooth, probe whether they almost didn't submit at all and what changed their mind. If they mention a past idea that went nowhere, ask what feedback loop they expected but didn't get.

Q08
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to submit another idea to this program in the future?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
장문형

What one change would make you more likely to submit ideas in the future, or to encourage a colleague to do so?

Q10
객관식

How did you first hear about this idea submission program?

  • Manager or team lead
  • Company-wide email or announcement
  • Intranet or internal portal
  • Colleague mentioned it
  • Poster, event, or town hall
  • Other
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your department or function? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual department list before launching.)

  • Operations
  • Engineering / Product
  • Sales or Customer Service
  • Marketing
  • Finance or Administration
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-10 years
  • More than 10 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you for sharing your experience! Your answers go directly to the team running the idea program and will help us simplify the process and close the loop faster on submissions like yours.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual idea's context and the specific friction that almost stopped the person from submitting, rather than just capturing a satisfaction score
  • Combines structured metrics (ease-of-submission opinion scale, instruction-clarity rating, agreement matrix) with an open long-text question on what change would increase future submissions, so program owners get both quantifiable and qualitative signal
  • Asks what prompted the submission and how the person first heard about the program, giving innovation teams insight into which channels and motivations actually drive idea flow
  • Closes with an intent-to-resubmit opinion scale plus department/tenure classification questions, letting owners segment friction and motivation by team and experience level

Jotform

Idea Submission Form Template

A static, customizable form template for collecting employee or customer ideas, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's a fielding-ready form for capturing idea submissions but is not designed to measure or diagnose the submission experience itself. No interview or follow-up mechanism is described.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's broader form builder ecosystem
  • Likely supports file uploads and integrations common to Jotform templates
  • Quick to deploy for basic idea intake

아쉬운 점

  • Static form with no adaptive follow-up questioning to probe why an idea was or wasn't easy to submit
  • No mechanism to reconstruct the context or friction behind a specific submission
  • No published methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted

SurveySparrow

Idea Submission Form Template

A conversational-style form template aimed at employee idea submission, consistent with SurveySparrow's chat-like survey format. It focuses on collecting the idea itself rather than evaluating the submission experience (form clarity, guideline understanding, likelihood to resubmit). No indication of AI-driven follow-up or per-response quality scoring.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational UI that may feel more approachable than a traditional form
  • Positioned specifically for employee-facing idea programs
  • Likely integrates with SurveySparrow's existing survey distribution tools

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to dig into the specific idea's context or the friction that nearly stopped submission
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report focused on submission-experience metrics
  • Fixed question set with no evidence of voice-based interviewing or guided screen-share tasks

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.