모든 템플릿

Employee Phishing Readiness & Security Behavior Assessment

Measures employee phishing detection confidence, reporting behavior, and security practices to identify organizational risk gaps and prioritize awareness training investments.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 23개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Phishing Readiness & Security Behavior Survey. This survey asks about your experiences with suspicious messages, your security habits, and your ideas for improvement. It should take approximately 6–8 minutes to complete. Your participation is completely voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest experiences and opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Please click 'Next' to begin.

Q02
객관식

To the best of your knowledge, did you receive any message you considered suspicious (email, SMS/text, or chat) in the past 30 days?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
의견 척도

In the past 60 days, how often did you hover over or inspect links before clicking them in emails or messages?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Always
Q04
의견 척도

How confident are you that you could handle a suspicious message appropriately?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q05
객관식

What is your most common way to report a suspected phishing message?

  • Report Phish button/add-in in email
  • Security email alias
  • IT helpdesk ticket
  • Messaging app bot
  • Tell my manager
  • I don't report them
  • I'm not sure how to report
Q06
드롭다운

When did you last complete security awareness training?

  • Within the last 30 days
  • 31–90 days ago
  • 3–6 months ago
  • More than 6 months ago
  • I have not completed it
  • I don't remember
Q07
드롭다운

What is your primary role?

  • Engineering/IT
  • Operations
  • Finance/Accounting
  • Sales/Marketing
  • HR/People
  • Legal/Compliance
  • Product/Design
  • Customer Support/Success
  • Executive/Leadership
  • Other
Q08
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts about what would help you handle phishing attempts more effectively.

Q09
드롭다운

Approximately how many suspicious or phishing-like messages did you notice in the past 30 days?

  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • More than 20
Q10
의견 척도

In the past 60 days, how often did you verify the sender's identity before acting on a request (e.g., checking the email address or calling the person)?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Always
Q11
순위 매기기

When judging whether an email is legitimate, rank these cues from most to least important to you.

  1. Sender domain and address
  2. Link URL on hover
  3. Urgent or threatening tone
  4. Unexpected attachments or requests for credentials
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q12
드롭다운

When you do report a suspicious message, approximately how long does it typically take from the moment you notice it?

  • Within 5 minutes
  • 5–30 minutes
  • 30–60 minutes
  • 1–4 hours
  • More than 4 hours
  • I typically don't report suspicious messages
Q13
순위 매기기

Rank the following areas by where investment would most improve phishing readiness for your team, from highest to lowest priority.

  1. Better reporting tools and integrations
  2. More frequent simulated phishing exercises
  3. Improved training content and refreshers
  4. Faster feedback after reports
  5. Just-in-time guidance in email apps
  6. Manager reinforcement and team nudges
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q14
드롭다운

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • More than 5 years
Q15
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand more about how you handle suspicious messages. Imagine a senior executive emails you requesting urgent gift card codes. Walk us through what you would do and why.

Q16
의견 척도

In the past 60 days, how often did you report suspicious messages through your organization's official reporting channel?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Always
Q17
객관식

Which of the following actions are recommended when you suspect a message is a phishing attempt? Select all that apply.

  • Use the report button or security alias
  • Avoid clicking links or opening attachments
  • Verify the request through a known, separate channel
  • Share the suspicious email in a public chat
  • Forward to personal email to check later
  • Reply to the sender asking if it's legitimate
  • Delete without reporting
Q18
객관식

What are the biggest things that slow you down or stop you from reporting suspicious messages? Select up to 3.

  • Not sure what information to include in a report
  • Unsure which channel to use
  • Worried about reporting a false alarm
  • Too busy or it takes too long
  • Reporting tools are hard to find or use
  • No feedback after reporting
  • I resolve it myself instead of reporting
  • None of the above
Q19
드롭다운

In which region do you primarily work?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Multiple regions
  • Other
Q20
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will be analyzed in aggregate to identify training priorities and strengthen our organization's security posture. All answers are confidential.

Q21
의견 척도

In the past 60 days, how often did you check a URL or website address before entering login credentials?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Always
Q22
드롭다운

What is your typical work setting?

  • Primarily in-office
  • Hybrid
  • Primarily remote
Q23
객관식

Which of the following security practices do you currently use on your primary work devices? Select all that apply.

  • Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
  • Password manager for work accounts
  • Automatic OS and browser updates enabled
  • Lock screen when stepping away
  • VPN on public networks
  • Unique passwords for each service
  • Phishing-report add-in/button installed
  • None of these

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes adaptive opinion-scale questions on link-hovering, sender verification, and reporting frequency over the past 60 days, plus a ranking exercise on which email cues matter most
  • Goes beyond static self-report by including a scenario-based AI follow-up interview asking respondents to imagine and describe handling a suspicious message in their own words
  • Captures organizational context (role, tenure, region, work setting) alongside behavioral and confidence metrics, enabling segmentation of risk gaps by group
  • Asks a second ranking question on where security investment would most improve readiness, directly supporting prioritization of awareness training spend

Jotform

Cyber Security Risk Assessment Checklist Form Template

This is a static checklist-style form aimed at general cyber security risk assessment rather than phishing-specific employee behavior. It's fielding-ready for basic checkbox-driven audits but not built around adaptive questioning or behavioral depth. Useful as a broad IT risk inventory rather than a targeted phishing readiness survey.

잘하는 점

  • Simple checklist format that's quick for respondents to complete
  • Drag-and-drop form builder typical of Jotform's platform
  • Can be embedded or shared easily as part of broader IT audit workflows

아쉬운 점

  • Static checklist with no adaptive follow-up probing into individual responses
  • No mechanism to assess phishing-specific behaviors like reporting speed or link-checking habits
  • No transparent scoring methodology or automated report generation described

SurveySparrow

Information Security Risk Assessment Questionnaire

A general information security risk questionnaire rather than a phishing-focused behavioral assessment. It appears to be a fielding-ready template covering broad security risk topics, but lacks the granularity around phishing detection confidence and reporting friction. Best suited for organizations wanting a wide security posture snapshot rather than a targeted awareness-training diagnostic.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational survey format typical of SurveySparrow's UI
  • Covers broad information security risk topics beyond just phishing
  • Fielding-ready template that can be launched quickly

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing to probe inconsistent or interesting answers
  • No per-response quality scoring to flag unreliable answers
  • Does not appear to include phishing-specific behavioral metrics like time-to-report or reporting channel used

SurveyMonkey

Security Awareness Survey Template

This is the closest direct competitor, targeting general security awareness among employees. It's a fielding-ready static template, likely covering knowledge and attitudes, but without behavioral granularity like phishing cue ranking or training-recency segmentation. Good for a quick pulse-check but not designed to surface prioritized investment areas.

잘하는 점

  • Well-established survey platform with strong distribution and analytics tooling
  • Template likely covers general security awareness topics accessibly for HR/IT teams
  • Easy to customize using SurveyMonkey's standard question library

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI-driven follow-up interviewing
  • No scenario-based interview component to observe how employees reason through a suspicious message
  • No transparent per-response quality scoring or automated gap-prioritization reporting

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.