모든 템플릿

Manager 1:1 Effectiveness Pulse Survey

Assesses the cadence, quality, and follow-through of manager one-on-one meetings over a 90-day period. Designed for HR and People teams seeking actionable data to improve meeting practices and manager effectiveness.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 28개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Manager 1:1 Effectiveness Pulse. This short survey asks about your one-on-one meetings with your direct manager over the past 90 days. Your responses are completely anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate — no individual answers will be shared with your manager or leadership. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we simply want your honest perspective. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. If you had no 1:1 meetings in this period, please select 'Not applicable' where offered.

Q02
객관식

In the past 3 months, did you have at least one scheduled 1:1 meeting with your direct manager?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
객관식

How often were 1:1s with your manager typically scheduled in the past 3 months?

  • Weekly
  • Every 2 weeks
  • Monthly
  • Less often than monthly
  • Irregular / only as needed
  • Not applicable (no 1:1s)
Q04
의견 척도

Overall, how useful have your 1:1s been for you in the past 3 months?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all useful최대:Extremely useful
Q05
객관식

How are action items from your 1:1s usually captured?

  • Shared document or tracker
  • Ticket or project tool (e.g., Jira, Asana)
  • Chat or email recap
  • Verbal agreement only
  • I capture my own notes separately
  • Not applicable (no action items typically set)
Q06
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, what one change would make your 1:1s more valuable for you?

Q07
객관식

Which best describes your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager (manages direct reports)
  • Leads managers (manager of managers)
  • Other / Not sure
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your input is valuable and will be used to help improve the quality of 1:1 meetings across the organization.

Q09
객관식

What was the typical length of your 1:1s in the past 3 months?

  • 15 minutes or less
  • 30 minutes
  • 45 minutes
  • 60 minutes
  • More than 60 minutes
  • Varies significantly
  • Not applicable (no 1:1s)
Q10
의견 척도

How useful have your 1:1s been for getting feedback on your work and performance?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all useful최대:Extremely useful
Q11
객관식

Who is primarily accountable for following up on 1:1 action items?

  • Mostly me
  • Mostly my manager
  • Shared evenly
  • It varies by item
  • We rarely set action items
  • Not applicable (no 1:1s)
Q12
AI 인터뷰

You've shared some thoughts about your 1:1 meetings. I'd like to explore a couple of those in more depth. Can you tell me more about what's working well or what you'd most like to change about your 1:1s with your manager?

Q13
드롭다운

What is your primary function or department?

  • Engineering
  • Product
  • Design / UX
  • Data / Analytics
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer Support / Success
  • HR / People
  • Finance / Legal / Operations
  • Other
Q14
의견 척도

In the past 3 months, how often were your scheduled 1:1s canceled or rescheduled?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Very often
Q15
의견 척도

How useful have your 1:1s been for discussing your career growth and development?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all useful최대:Extremely useful
Q16
드롭다운

Approximately what share of action items from your 1:1s are completed by the next meeting?

  • None (0%)
  • About 25%
  • About 50%
  • About 75%
  • Nearly all (90%+)
  • Not applicable (no action items or 1:1s)
Q17
드롭다운

How long have you been at your current company?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
객관식

How is the agenda typically set for your 1:1s?

  • I prepare most of it
  • My manager prepares most of it
  • We co-create it in advance
  • We co-create it at the start of the meeting
  • There is usually no agenda
  • Not applicable (no 1:1s)
Q19
의견 척도

How useful have your 1:1s been for removing blockers or escalating issues?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all useful최대:Extremely useful
Q20
의견 척도

Action items from my 1:1s are clear and specific.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q21
드롭다운

How long have you reported to your current direct manager?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • More than 3 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
의견 척도

How useful have your 1:1s been for aligning on priorities and goals?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all useful최대:Extremely useful
Q23
드롭다운

What is the approximate size of the team you work with most closely (including your manager)?

  • Just me (1)
  • 2–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • 21–50
  • 51+
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
의견 척도

How useful have your 1:1s been for building a stronger working relationship with your manager?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all useful최대:Extremely useful
Q25
객관식

What is your primary work arrangement?

  • On-site
  • Hybrid
  • Remote
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
의견 척도

My manager comes prepared to our 1:1s.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q27
드롭다운

Which region best describes where you are primarily based?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q28
순위 매기기

Rank the following topics by how much time they typically receive in your 1:1s, from most time (1) to least time (5).

  1. Status updates and project progress
  2. Problem-solving and removing blockers
  3. Career development and growth
  4. Feedback (giving and receiving)
  5. Relationship building and well-being
드래그하여 순위 지정

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond static Likert questions with six separate usefulness ratings (overall, feedback, career growth, blockers, priorities, relationship-building) so HR can pinpoint exactly which function of the 1:1 is failing.
  • Includes a ranking question on topic time allocation plus concrete process questions (agenda ownership, action-item capture method, completion-rate dropdown, accountability owner) that diagnose process breakdowns, not just sentiment.
  • The open-text 'one change' question feeds directly into an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes the respondent's own wording for specifics — something a fixed-question form cannot do.
  • Rich segmentation block (role level, department, tenure with company and with manager, team size, work arrangement, region) lets People teams cut results by cohort without redesigning the survey.

Jotform

Manager Effectiveness Survey Form Template

A ready-to-use static form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, aimed at general manager feedback collection. It's easy to customize and embed but is a fixed-question form rather than an adaptive interview instrument. Good for quick deployment, less suited to deep qualitative follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Simple drag-and-drop customization
  • Large existing template/integration ecosystem
  • Fast to deploy for basic feedback collection

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — all respondents see the same fixed question set
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions probe deeper

QuestionPro

Manager Effectiveness Survey Template

Part of QuestionPro's broad enterprise survey template library, with the platform's standard analytics and reporting tools behind it. It targets general manager-effectiveness measurement rather than the specific 90-day 1:1 cadence and follow-through focus of our template. Strong on statistical reporting, static on question logic.

잘하는 점

  • Established enterprise survey/analytics platform
  • Broad reporting and dashboard capabilities
  • Large template library for HR use cases

아쉬운 점

  • Static branching logic only, no true adaptive AI interviewing of open responses
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated response-level quality scoring disclosed

SurveySparrow

Manager Effectiveness Survey Template

Delivered through SurveySparrow's conversational chat-style survey UI, which makes the experience feel more personal than a traditional form. It's still a pre-set question flow rather than an AI system that generates follow-ups based on what the respondent actually says. Useful for engagement-friendly presentation, not deep probing.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-like UI improves respondent experience
  • Employee-experience-focused template library
  • Mobile-friendly presentation

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational styling is not the same as adaptive AI interviewing — no dynamic follow-up generation
  • No guided task or screen-share capability
  • No transparent prompt/methodology disclosure

Typeform

Manager Effectiveness Survey Template

A polished, one-question-at-a-time conversational form template well known for clean design and completion rates. Logic jumps allow some branching, but there's no AI generating new questions from respondent answers. Best suited to lightweight, aesthetically pleasing pulse checks rather than deep diagnostic interviews.

잘하는 점

  • Highly polished, well-tested conversational UX
  • Logic-jump branching for basic personalization
  • Wide brand recognition and ease of sharing

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview — logic jumps are pre-authored, not generated from response content
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.