Post-Support Interaction CSAT, CES & NPS Survey
Measures customer effort, satisfaction, and loyalty immediately after a support interaction. Designed for CX teams seeking actionable CSAT, CES, and NPS benchmarks in under 3 minutes.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which channel did you first use to contact support for this issue?
- Live chat
- Phone
- In-app messaging
- Social media
- Self-service portal / Help center
- Other
The company made it easy for me to resolve my issue.
We'd like to understand how the support agent(s) handled your interaction. Please rate your agreement with each statement.
Overall, how satisfied are you with the support you received?
What is one thing we could improve about your support experience?
Which of the following best describes your role?
- Consumer / Individual
- Business user
- Team / Org admin
- Developer / Engineer
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback — it directly helps us improve your support experience.
Which outcome best describes your most recent support interaction?
- Resolved completely
- Partially resolved
- Not resolved yet
- I decided not to continue
How satisfied are you with the speed at which your issue was handled?
The support agent understood my issue.
How likely are you to recommend our support experience to a friend or colleague?
We'd love to learn more about your experience. Our AI assistant will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your responses.
What is your age group?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Including the first time, how many times did you contact us about this issue?
- 1 (this was my first contact)
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5 or more
The support agent was empathetic and respectful.
Where are you located?
- United States
- Canada
- United Kingdom
- European Union
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East & Africa
- Other
- Prefer not to say
The support agent communicated clearly and kept me informed.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Combines all three core support metrics (CES, CSAT on speed, agent-level satisfaction, and NPS) in a single structured flow rather than a generic satisfaction-only form
- Separates issue resolution effort from agent-specific empathy, clarity, and understanding, so CX teams can pinpoint whether problems are process-driven or agent-driven
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that can probe open-ended feedback in real time, going beyond a single static 'what could we improve' text box
- Captures contact channel, repeat-contact count, and outcome up front, giving benchmarking context (channel/repeat-contact effects on CSAT/CES) that flat satisfaction templates typically omit
SurveyMonkey
Customer Support Satisfaction Survey TemplateA fielding-ready, static template focused on general support satisfaction. It's backed by SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and analytics tooling, but the question set itself appears to be a fixed satisfaction survey rather than one combining CES, CSAT, and NPS with agent-level breakdowns.
What it does well
- Established survey platform with mature distribution and reporting tools
- Simple, ready-to-use template requiring no build time
- Broad brand recognition, likely easing respondent trust
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open-ended answers
- No indication of separate effort (CES) vs. agent-empathy vs. loyalty (NPS) breakdown in one flow
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how satisfaction is scored
Jotform
200+ Customer Satisfaction Evaluation FormsThis is a category/listing page aggregating 200+ separate form templates, not a single fielding-ready CSAT/CES/NPS survey. Useful as a form-building starting point, but a researcher would need to pick and customize an individual form rather than deploy one purpose-built instrument.
What it does well
- Large library of customizable form templates to choose from
- Jotform's drag-and-drop builder allows quick edits to any selected form
- Supports embedding forms across many channels/websites
Where it falls short
- Not a single ready-to-field survey — requires browsing and selecting from many generic forms
- No built-in adaptive AI interviewing or voice-based follow-up
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent scoring methodology
QuestionPro
Customer Support Service Evaluation Survey TemplateA dedicated, fielding-ready support evaluation template from an established survey vendor. It likely covers standard satisfaction and service-quality questions, but as a static questionnaire it doesn't appear to include adaptive interviewing or voice-based follow-up.
What it does well
- Purpose-built for support/service evaluation specifically
- Backed by QuestionPro's established survey logic and reporting features
- Likely includes standard demographic and service-quality question banks
Where it falls short
- Static multiple-choice/rating format with no adaptive AI-driven follow-up questions
- No voice AI interview option for richer qualitative capture
- No transparent, published prompt/scoring methodology for open-ended responses
SurveySparrow
FREE Customer Satisfaction Survey TemplateA free, conversational-style CSAT template, consistent with SurveySparrow's chat-like survey UI. It's a general satisfaction survey rather than one explicitly structured around CES + agent-level breakdown + NPS in a single post-support flow.
What it does well
- Conversational, chat-style survey format that can feel more engaging than static forms
- Free to use, lowering the barrier to start collecting feedback
- SurveySparrow's platform supports omnichannel distribution
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI follow-up on open-ended feedback
- No automated quality scoring of individual responses
- No visible integration of CES, agent-specific satisfaction, and NPS into one unified post-support instrument
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
E-Commerce Post-Purchase Experience Survey
Measures customer satisfaction across the full post-purchase journey — checkout, shipping, delivery, and product quality — to identify friction points and drive retention improvements.
View templatePost-Purchase NPS & Loyalty Driver Survey
Measures Net Promoter Score and identifies key drivers of recommendation among recent customers, providing actionable insights to improve retention, referrals, and overall customer experience.
View templateProduct CX Survey: Clarity, Speed & Documentation
Measures customer experience across product clarity, task speed, and documentation usability to identify friction points and prioritize improvements for product and CX teams.
View templateLoyalty Program Satisfaction & Redemption Survey
Measures loyalty program members' satisfaction with reward relevance, redemption ease, and perceived value relative to competitors to identify retention drivers and improvement priorities.
View templateLive Chat vs. Async Messaging: Support Channel Preference Survey
Measures customer preferences, satisfaction, and response-time expectations across live chat and asynchronous messaging channels to guide support channel investment and design decisions.
View templatePost-Purchase Delivery Experience & NPS Survey
Measures end-to-end delivery experience from order placement through last-mile handoff, capturing satisfaction, communication quality, issue incidence, and NPS for e-commerce and logistics teams.
View template