EV Public Charging Payment Clarity & Reliability Survey
A diagnostic survey for EV drivers who have used public charging in the last 30 days, measuring payment transparency, first-attempt success rates, failure patterns, and perceived price fairness to identify priority improvement areas for charging operators.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Have you used a public EV charger in the last 30 days?
- Yes
- No
Approximately how many public charging sessions did you complete in the last 30 days?
- 1–2 sessions
- 3–5 sessions
- 6–10 sessions
- 11–20 sessions
- More than 20 sessions
Before you start a charging session, how is pricing typically displayed? Select the option that best matches your most common experience.
- Price per kWh only
- Price per minute only
- Per kWh + session fee
- Per minute + session fee
- Tiered by charger power level
- Dynamic pricing (varies by demand or time of day)
- Price not shown before starting
- It varies too much by location/operator to say
- Other (please specify)
In the last 30 days, how often did your first payment attempt succeed without any issues?
Overall, how fair do you feel the prices were that you paid at public chargers in the last 30 days?
Based on your experiences, what one thing would most improve payment clarity or reliability at public EV chargers?
What type of electric vehicle do you primarily drive?
- Battery electric vehicle (BEV)
- Plug-in hybrid (PHEV)
- Other
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will help improve the public EV charging experience. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the study team.
In the last 30 days, which payment methods did you use at public EV chargers? Select all that apply.
- Contactless card (tap)
- Chip-and-PIN card
- Mobile wallet (Apple Pay / Google Pay)
- Network mobile app
- RFID card or fob
- QR code to web checkout
- Plug & Charge (ISO 15118)
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how clear was the pricing information displayed at public chargers you used in the last 30 days?
Approximately how many times did a payment attempt fail at a public charger in the last 30 days?
- 0 — no failures
- 1–2 times
- 3–5 times
- 6 or more times
How likely are you to recommend the public charging network you use most often to another EV driver?
Thank you for your written response. I'd like to explore your thoughts a bit further. Could you tell me more about a specific experience where payment clarity or reliability affected your charging session?
In which region do you primarily use public chargers?
- North America
- UK & Ireland
- Europe (excluding UK & Ireland)
- Australia & New Zealand
- Asia (excluding Middle East)
- Middle East
- Africa
- Latin America & Caribbean
Which charger types do you use most often? Select all that apply.
- On-street slow AC (≤7 kW)
- Level 2 AC (up to ~22 kW)
- DC fast (50–149 kW)
- High-power DC (150 kW+)
Which of the following payment issues, if any, did you experience at a public charger in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.
- Card reader malfunction
- App or network error
- Poor mobile signal or connectivity
- Card unexpectedly declined
- Price mismatch or pricing confusion
- QR code or URL not working
- Account authentication timeout
- Other (please specify)
- I did not experience any payment issues
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thinking of your most recent payment failure, how did you resolve it?
- Retried the same method at the same charger
- Switched to a different payment method at the same charger
- Moved to another charger at the same site
- Drove to a different site or operator
- Called support and it was resolved
- Abandoned the session entirely
What is your gender?
- Man
- Woman
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
How helpful was the charging support you contacted?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Combines closed-ended metrics (pricing display clarity, first-attempt payment success, failure frequency) with an AI follow-up interview that probes the open-text response about what would most improve payment clarity
- Captures failure-pattern detail (payment issues experienced, resolution method, support helpfulness) that goes beyond a single satisfaction score
- Includes demographic and usage-context questions (EV type, region, session frequency, charger type) so operators can segment reliability and fairness findings
- Produces an auto-generated report with transparent prompts, so operators can see exactly what the AI asked and why during the follow-up interview
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Time-of-Use & Dynamic Electricity Pricing Acceptance Survey
Measures residential electricity customers' acceptance of time-of-use (TOU) and dynamic pricing plans, perceived fairness, enrollment intent, and preferred program features. Suitable for utilities and energy researchers designing or evaluating variable-rate programs.
View templateResidential Demand Response Enrollment & Trade-Off Assessment
Measures utility customers' awareness, enrollment likelihood, incentive preferences, and acceptable trade-offs for demand response programs to inform program design and marketing strategy.
View templateCorporate Social & Environmental Responsibility Perception Survey
Measures consumer awareness, credibility perceptions, and purchase influence of corporate CSR and ESG initiatives, including brand trust, willingness to pay, and expectations for responsible business practices.
View templateCarbon Dashboard Comprehension & Actionability Assessment
Evaluates internal stakeholders' ability to interpret carbon metrics and translate dashboard insights into prioritized actions, using scenario-based comprehension tasks and self-reported usability measures.
View templateWater Stewardship vs. Product Attributes: Consumer Tradeoff Study
Measures how consumers weigh responsible water use against price, quality, and other product attributes. Designed for consumer panels to quantify sustainability-driven tradeoffs and identify the attitudinal and contextual drivers behind willingness to pay for water stewardship.
View templateElectronics Repairability vs. Warranty Trade-off Study
Measures how consumer electronics buyers weigh repairability against warranty coverage in purchase decisions. Use this instrument to identify key purchase drivers, willingness-to-pay premiums for repairability features, and information-seeking behavior across demographic segments.
View template