AI Literacy Self-Assessment for Undergraduates
A validated self-assessment instrument measuring undergraduate AI literacy across five dimensions: conceptual understanding, practical skills, critical evaluation, ethical reasoning, and awareness of limitations. Estimated completion time: 10-12 minutes.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Are you currently enrolled as an undergraduate student at a college or university?
- Yes
- No
How often do you use AI-powered tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Grammarly, DALL-E) for any purpose?
- Never
- A few times a year
- A few times a month
- A few times a week
- Daily or almost daily
The following statements describe knowledge and skills related to AI concepts. For each statement, please indicate how much you agree or disagree based on your current abilities.
I can use AI-powered tools effectively to help me complete academic tasks (e.g., research, writing, coding).
I can identify when an AI tool has generated inaccurate or fabricated information.
I can identify ethical concerns that arise from using AI tools in academic work.
I can describe the types of tasks where current AI systems are likely to perform poorly or unreliably.
Overall, how would you rate your current level of AI literacy?
Thinking about your responses throughout this survey, what do you see as the biggest gap in your own AI literacy, and what would help you address it?
Finally, we have a few questions about your background for classification purposes.
Which of the following AI-powered tools have you used at least once? Select all that apply.
- ChatGPT
- Microsoft Copilot
- Google Gemini
- Claude
- Grammarly
- DALL-E / Midjourney / other image generators
- GitHub Copilot / coding assistants
- AI-powered search (e.g., Perplexity, Bing AI)
- Other AI tools
- I have never used any AI tools
I can explain the basic concept of artificial intelligence in my own words.
I can write clear and specific prompts to get useful results from generative AI tools.
I can evaluate whether AI-generated content is well-reasoned and supported by evidence.
I can explain the privacy implications of sharing personal or sensitive data with AI tools.
I can explain why AI systems sometimes generate confident-sounding but incorrect responses.
How prepared do you feel to use AI tools responsibly and effectively in your academic and professional life?
What is your current year of undergraduate study?
- First year / Freshman
- Second year / Sophomore
- Third year / Junior
- Fourth year / Senior
- Fifth year or beyond
- Prefer not to say
Have you completed any formal course, workshop, or training that covered artificial intelligence or machine learning concepts?
- Yes, a full course (e.g., semester-long)
- Yes, a short workshop or training session
- No, but I have learned informally (e.g., online videos, articles)
- No, I have no formal or informal AI education
I can describe how a machine learning model learns patterns from data.
I can choose the most appropriate AI tool for a specific task from among the options available to me.
I can recognize potential biases in the outputs produced by AI systems.
I can evaluate whether using an AI tool in a specific academic situation would be considered a violation of academic integrity.
I can identify situations where it would be inappropriate or risky to rely on AI-generated outputs.
Which of the following best describes your primary field of study?
- Computer Science / Information Technology
- Engineering
- Natural Sciences (e.g., Biology, Chemistry, Physics)
- Mathematics / Statistics
- Social Sciences (e.g., Psychology, Sociology, Political Science)
- Business / Economics
- Humanities (e.g., English, History, Philosophy)
- Arts / Design / Media
- Health Sciences / Nursing
- Education
- Other
- Undeclared / Undecided
- Prefer not to say
I can explain the difference between AI that follows predefined rules and AI that learns from examples.
I can modify and refine AI-generated outputs to improve their quality and relevance for my needs.
I can verify AI-generated claims by cross-referencing them with credible sources.
I can articulate how AI systems might perpetuate or amplify societal inequities.
I understand that AI systems do not truly comprehend or understand information the way humans do.
What is your age?
- 18 or under
- 19-20
- 21-22
- 23-25
- 26-30
- 31 or older
- Prefer not to say
I can describe what training data is and why it matters for AI system performance.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Includes an AI follow-up interview question that asks respondents to reflect on the biggest gap in their AI literacy after seeing their own scale responses, enabling deeper, personalized probing that a static form cannot replicate
- Structured across the five stated dimensions (conceptual understanding, practical skills, critical evaluation, ethical reasoning, awareness of limitations) with dedicated opinion-scale items for each, rather than a generic single-topic checklist
- Opens with screening questions (enrollment status, tool usage frequency, prior AI training) so responses can be segmented by actual undergraduate experience level before the literacy items begin
- Closes with classification questions (year of study, field of study, age) enabling cross-tab analysis of AI literacy by academic background, and produces an auto-generated report from the collected data
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Generative AI and Student Learning Experience Survey
A research instrument measuring how generative AI tools affect student learning outcomes across learning depth, critical thinking, knowledge retention, and metacognitive awareness. Designed for pre/post and experimental research designs. Estimated completion time: 10–14 minutes.
View templateAI Chatbot Effectiveness in Student Advising & Support
This survey evaluates student experiences with AI chatbot advising and support services. It measures usage patterns, task types, perceived success rates, satisfaction, trust, comparison to human advisors, and areas for improvement.
View templateInstructor Readiness for AI Integration
This survey assesses instructor preparedness to integrate artificial intelligence into teaching, covering technology proficiency, AI literacy, pedagogical confidence, institutional support, professional development needs, and workload concerns. Estimated completion time: 10 minutes.
View templateFaculty Perspectives on AI in Grading & Assessment
An academic research survey exploring faculty attitudes, concerns, and readiness regarding AI-assisted grading and assessment tools. Covers current practices, openness to adoption, concerns about bias/accuracy/privacy, training needs, and willingness to participate in controlled experiments.
View templatePost-Training Learning Transfer Assessment
Measures how effectively employees apply recent training to their jobs, identifying barriers, enablers, and perceived outcomes to improve learning transfer and training ROI.
View templateCourse Engagement & Learning Outcomes Pulse Survey
A bi-weekly pulse survey measuring student engagement behaviors, support resource usage, and perceived learning progress. Designed for course instructors and instructional designers seeking actionable insights to improve eLearning and hybrid course experiences.
View template