All templates
AI & Technology

AI Adoption in Higher Education

A research survey exploring how faculty and students adopt, perceive, and experience AI tools in higher education settings. Covers current usage patterns, perceived benefits and barriers, institutional policy awareness, training needs, and impact on teaching and learning outcomes.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

32 questions · ~13 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to this research survey on AI tools in higher education. This study explores how faculty and students experience artificial intelligence tools in academic settings. Your responses will help researchers understand current usage patterns, perceptions, and institutional contexts. • Participation is entirely voluntary. You may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. • Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. • This survey takes approximately 12–15 minutes to complete. • Results will be used for academic research purposes. By continuing, you indicate that you have read this information and consent to participate.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Are you currently affiliated with a higher education institution as a faculty member, instructor, or enrolled student?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
Multiple Choice

Which of the following best describes your primary role at your institution?

  • Full-time faculty / professor
  • Part-time / adjunct faculty
  • Graduate teaching assistant
  • Postdoctoral researcher
  • Undergraduate student
  • Graduate student (Master's)
  • Graduate student (Doctoral)
  • Staff with teaching responsibilities
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
Multiple Choice

Which of the following AI tools have you used in the past 12 months for academic purposes? (Select all that apply)

  • ChatGPT / OpenAI tools
  • Google Gemini
  • Microsoft Copilot
  • Claude (Anthropic)
  • Grammarly AI features
  • Quillbot
  • DALL-E / Midjourney / AI image generators
  • GitHub Copilot / AI coding assistants
  • AI-powered research tools (e.g., Elicit, Semantic Scholar, Consensus)
  • AI transcription or note-taking tools (e.g., Otter.ai)
  • AI-powered learning platforms (e.g., Khan Academy AI, Duolingo AI)
  • Other (please specify)
  • I have not used any AI tools for academic purposes
Q05
Opinion Scale

To what extent do you agree that AI tools improve the quality of your academic work?

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q06
Opinion Scale

How concerned are you about the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all concernedMax:Extremely concerned
Q07
Opinion Scale

To what extent are you aware of your institution's policies on AI tool use in academic settings?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all awareMax:Fully aware
Q08
Opinion Scale

How confident do you feel in your ability to use AI tools effectively for academic purposes?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q09
Opinion Scale

Overall, how would you rate the impact of AI tools on the quality of teaching and learning at your institution?

Scale: 17
Min:Very negative impactMax:Very positive impact
Q10
AI Interview

Tell us about a specific experience where an AI tool significantly affected your teaching or learning. What happened, and how did it shape your view of AI in education?

Q11
Long Text

Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about AI tools in higher education that we may not have covered.

Q12
Dropdown

What is your age range?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Message

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are valuable to understanding AI adoption in higher education. Your answers are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the research team at the email address provided in your invitation.

Q14
Dropdown

What is your primary academic discipline or field of study?

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Biological Sciences
  • Business & Management
  • Computer Science & Information Technology
  • Education
  • Engineering
  • Health Sciences & Medicine
  • Law
  • Mathematics & Statistics
  • Physical Sciences
  • Social Sciences
  • Other (please specify)
Q15
Multiple Choice

How frequently do you use AI tools for academic work?

  • Daily
  • Several times a week
  • About once a week
  • A few times a month
  • Less than once a month
  • I have tried AI tools but no longer use them
  • I have never used AI tools for academic work
Q16
Opinion Scale

To what extent do you agree that AI tools save you time on academic tasks?

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q17
Opinion Scale

How concerned are you about academic integrity issues related to AI tool use?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all concernedMax:Extremely concerned
Q18
Multiple Choice

Does your institution have a formal, written policy on the use of AI tools in teaching or coursework?

  • Yes, a comprehensive policy
  • Yes, but it is limited or partial
  • No formal policy exists
  • I don't know
Q19
Multiple Choice

How much formal training have you received on using AI tools for academic work?

  • No formal training
  • Brief introduction (e.g., a single workshop or webinar)
  • Moderate training (e.g., multiple sessions or a short course)
  • Extensive training (e.g., a full course or certification)
  • I am self-taught through personal exploration
Q20
Opinion Scale

How likely are you to increase your use of AI tools for academic purposes in the next 12 months?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unlikelyMax:Very likely
Q21
Dropdown

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary / gender diverse
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
Multiple Choice

For which of the following academic tasks do you use AI tools? (Select all that apply)

  • Writing or editing papers / assignments
  • Literature review or research discovery
  • Generating ideas or brainstorming
  • Data analysis or coding
  • Creating presentations or visual materials
  • Studying or exam preparation
  • Developing course materials or syllabi
  • Grading or providing feedback
  • Translation or language assistance
  • Administrative tasks (scheduling, emails)
  • Other (please specify)
  • Not applicable — I do not use AI tools
Q23
Opinion Scale

To what extent do you agree that AI tools help you learn or understand new concepts?

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q24
Opinion Scale

How concerned are you about data privacy when using AI tools for academic purposes?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all concernedMax:Extremely concerned
Q25
Opinion Scale

How adequate do you find your institution's current AI policies for guiding your academic work?

Scale: 17
Min:Completely inadequateMax:Completely adequate
Q26
Multiple Choice

Which of the following training formats would be most useful to you? (Select up to 3)

  • Self-paced online modules
  • Live workshops or seminars
  • Peer-led learning communities
  • One-on-one coaching or mentoring
  • Written guides or documentation
  • Video tutorials
  • Discipline-specific AI training sessions
  • Hands-on sandbox environments to practice
  • Other (please specify)
Q27
Opinion Scale

How likely are you to recommend AI tools to a colleague or fellow student for academic use?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unlikelyMax:Very likely
Q28
Dropdown

How many years have you been in your current role in higher education?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • 11–20 years
  • More than 20 years
Q29
Opinion Scale

To what extent do you agree that AI tools enhance creativity in your academic work?

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q30
Opinion Scale

How much of a barrier is the lack of clear institutional guidelines on AI use?

Scale: 17
Min:Not a barrier at allMax:A very significant barrier
Q31
Ranking

Please rank the following training topics in order of priority for you, from most to least important.

  1. Prompt engineering and effective AI interaction
  2. Ethical use and academic integrity considerations
  3. AI tools for research and literature review
  4. AI for writing and content creation
  5. Data privacy and security with AI tools
  6. Evaluating and fact-checking AI outputs
Drag to rank
Q32
Dropdown

Which best describes your institution type?

  • Research university (R1/R2)
  • Comprehensive / master's university
  • Liberal arts college
  • Community or technical college
  • Professional school (e.g., law, medical)
  • Online-only institution
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
AI & Technology

Warehouse Safety & Productivity Frontline Assessment

Captures frontline warehouse worker feedback on safety conditions, throughput changes, role clarity, and operational tools to identify improvement priorities and support OSHA compliance.

View template
AI & Technology

VR Motion Sickness & Comfort Technique Assessment

Measures VR players' motion sickness susceptibility, symptom frequency, discomfort triggers, and comfort technique preferences to guide UX design decisions for virtual reality games and experiences.

View template
AI & Technology

Developer Synthetic Data Adoption & Ethics Survey

Measures developer experience, tooling preferences, risk perceptions, and adoption intent for synthetic data. Designed for engineering and data science teams evaluating synthetic data readiness and ethical boundaries.

View template
AI & Technology

AI Refusal Message Clarity & Tone Evaluation

A stimulus-comparison survey for UX researchers and AI product teams to evaluate the clarity, tone, and helpfulness of AI safety and refusal messages. Produces actionable data on user preferences and improvement priorities.

View template
AI & Technology

AI Error Reporting Friction & Trust Impact Survey

Measures how AI users experience error reporting workflows and how unresolved issues affect trust and future reporting intent. Designed for product and UX teams seeking to reduce reporting friction and improve AI reliability perceptions.

View template
AI & Technology

Edge AI Governance & Monitoring Maturity Assessment

Assesses organizational readiness across edge AI governance, monitoring, risk, and MLOps practices. Designed for AI/ML leaders, DevOps, and compliance stakeholders to benchmark maturity and prioritize investment.

View template