AI Adoption in Higher Education
A research survey exploring how faculty and students adopt, perceive, and experience AI tools in higher education settings. Covers current usage patterns, perceived benefits and barriers, institutional policy awareness, training needs, and impact on teaching and learning outcomes.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Are you currently affiliated with a higher education institution as a faculty member, instructor, or enrolled student?
- Yes
- No
Which of the following best describes your primary role at your institution?
- Full-time faculty / professor
- Part-time / adjunct faculty
- Graduate teaching assistant
- Postdoctoral researcher
- Undergraduate student
- Graduate student (Master's)
- Graduate student (Doctoral)
- Staff with teaching responsibilities
- Other (please specify)
Which of the following AI tools have you used in the past 12 months for academic purposes? (Select all that apply)
- ChatGPT / OpenAI tools
- Google Gemini
- Microsoft Copilot
- Claude (Anthropic)
- Grammarly AI features
- Quillbot
- DALL-E / Midjourney / AI image generators
- GitHub Copilot / AI coding assistants
- AI-powered research tools (e.g., Elicit, Semantic Scholar, Consensus)
- AI transcription or note-taking tools (e.g., Otter.ai)
- AI-powered learning platforms (e.g., Khan Academy AI, Duolingo AI)
- Other (please specify)
- I have not used any AI tools for academic purposes
To what extent do you agree that AI tools improve the quality of your academic work?
How concerned are you about the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content?
To what extent are you aware of your institution's policies on AI tool use in academic settings?
How confident do you feel in your ability to use AI tools effectively for academic purposes?
Overall, how would you rate the impact of AI tools on the quality of teaching and learning at your institution?
Tell us about a specific experience where an AI tool significantly affected your teaching or learning. What happened, and how did it shape your view of AI in education?
Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about AI tools in higher education that we may not have covered.
What is your age range?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are valuable to understanding AI adoption in higher education. Your answers are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the research team at the email address provided in your invitation.
What is your primary academic discipline or field of study?
- Arts & Humanities
- Biological Sciences
- Business & Management
- Computer Science & Information Technology
- Education
- Engineering
- Health Sciences & Medicine
- Law
- Mathematics & Statistics
- Physical Sciences
- Social Sciences
- Other (please specify)
How frequently do you use AI tools for academic work?
- Daily
- Several times a week
- About once a week
- A few times a month
- Less than once a month
- I have tried AI tools but no longer use them
- I have never used AI tools for academic work
To what extent do you agree that AI tools save you time on academic tasks?
How concerned are you about academic integrity issues related to AI tool use?
Does your institution have a formal, written policy on the use of AI tools in teaching or coursework?
- Yes, a comprehensive policy
- Yes, but it is limited or partial
- No formal policy exists
- I don't know
How much formal training have you received on using AI tools for academic work?
- No formal training
- Brief introduction (e.g., a single workshop or webinar)
- Moderate training (e.g., multiple sessions or a short course)
- Extensive training (e.g., a full course or certification)
- I am self-taught through personal exploration
How likely are you to increase your use of AI tools for academic purposes in the next 12 months?
What is your gender identity?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary / gender diverse
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
For which of the following academic tasks do you use AI tools? (Select all that apply)
- Writing or editing papers / assignments
- Literature review or research discovery
- Generating ideas or brainstorming
- Data analysis or coding
- Creating presentations or visual materials
- Studying or exam preparation
- Developing course materials or syllabi
- Grading or providing feedback
- Translation or language assistance
- Administrative tasks (scheduling, emails)
- Other (please specify)
- Not applicable — I do not use AI tools
To what extent do you agree that AI tools help you learn or understand new concepts?
How concerned are you about data privacy when using AI tools for academic purposes?
How adequate do you find your institution's current AI policies for guiding your academic work?
Which of the following training formats would be most useful to you? (Select up to 3)
- Self-paced online modules
- Live workshops or seminars
- Peer-led learning communities
- One-on-one coaching or mentoring
- Written guides or documentation
- Video tutorials
- Discipline-specific AI training sessions
- Hands-on sandbox environments to practice
- Other (please specify)
How likely are you to recommend AI tools to a colleague or fellow student for academic use?
How many years have you been in your current role in higher education?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6–10 years
- 11–20 years
- More than 20 years
To what extent do you agree that AI tools enhance creativity in your academic work?
How much of a barrier is the lack of clear institutional guidelines on AI use?
Please rank the following training topics in order of priority for you, from most to least important.
- Prompt engineering and effective AI interaction
- Ethical use and academic integrity considerations
- AI tools for research and literature review
- AI for writing and content creation
- Data privacy and security with AI tools
- Evaluating and fact-checking AI outputs
Which best describes your institution type?
- Research university (R1/R2)
- Comprehensive / master's university
- Liberal arts college
- Community or technical college
- Professional school (e.g., law, medical)
- Online-only institution
- Other (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Warehouse Safety & Productivity Frontline Assessment
Captures frontline warehouse worker feedback on safety conditions, throughput changes, role clarity, and operational tools to identify improvement priorities and support OSHA compliance.
View templateVR Motion Sickness & Comfort Technique Assessment
Measures VR players' motion sickness susceptibility, symptom frequency, discomfort triggers, and comfort technique preferences to guide UX design decisions for virtual reality games and experiences.
View templateDeveloper Synthetic Data Adoption & Ethics Survey
Measures developer experience, tooling preferences, risk perceptions, and adoption intent for synthetic data. Designed for engineering and data science teams evaluating synthetic data readiness and ethical boundaries.
View templateAI Refusal Message Clarity & Tone Evaluation
A stimulus-comparison survey for UX researchers and AI product teams to evaluate the clarity, tone, and helpfulness of AI safety and refusal messages. Produces actionable data on user preferences and improvement priorities.
View templateAI Error Reporting Friction & Trust Impact Survey
Measures how AI users experience error reporting workflows and how unresolved issues affect trust and future reporting intent. Designed for product and UX teams seeking to reduce reporting friction and improve AI reliability perceptions.
View templateEdge AI Governance & Monitoring Maturity Assessment
Assesses organizational readiness across edge AI governance, monitoring, risk, and MLOps practices. Designed for AI/ML leaders, DevOps, and compliance stakeholders to benchmark maturity and prioritize investment.
View template