Educator AI Adoption, Policy & Classroom Impact Survey
Measures educators' AI tool usage patterns, institutional policy clarity, observed classroom outcomes, and support needs to inform evidence-based AI integration strategies across K-12 and higher education contexts.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which levels do you currently teach? Select all that apply.
- Elementary (K–5)
- Middle (6–8)
- High school (9–12)
- Higher education
- Adult/continuing education
- Other
In the past 6 months, how often have you personally used AI tools for teaching or preparation?
- Never
- Once or twice
- 1–3 times per month
- About weekly
- Multiple times per week
Which best describes your institution's current stance on AI use?
- Clear written policy
- Informal guidelines
- Under exploration
- No policy
- Not sure
Since AI tools became available in your context, how has student engagement in learning activities changed?
Overall, how beneficial has AI been for your teaching practice?
Please rank the following AI guardrail priorities from most to least important to you.
- Data privacy and security
- Transparency/disclosure to students
- Reducing bias and harmful outputs
- Teacher oversight and accountability
- Age-appropriate boundaries
- Accessibility and inclusion
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts, examples, or concerns about AI in your teaching.
How many years have you been teaching?
- 0–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–15
- 16–20
- 21+
Thank you for your time — your insights will help inform practical, evidence-based guidance for educators navigating AI integration.
Which AI tools or features have you used for teaching in the past 6 months? Select all that apply.
- ChatGPT or similar chatbots
- Built-in AI in LMS (e.g., Canvas, Google Classroom features)
- AI in productivity apps (e.g., Slides/Docs, PowerPoint/Word)
- AI writing assistants (e.g., Grammarly, QuillBot)
- Image generation tools
- Speech-to-text or text-to-speech
- Assessment/feedback tools with AI
- None of the above
- Other
How clear are the current AI guidelines for your role?
Since AI tools became available, how has the overall quality of student work changed?
How likely are you to continue or expand your use of AI tools for teaching over the next 12 months?
What support would help you use AI responsibly this term? Select all that apply.
- Example lesson plans or use cases
- Policy and disclosure templates
- Student-facing guidance materials
- Professional development workshops
- One-on-one coaching or office hours
- Peer community of practice
- I do not plan to use AI
- Other
We'd like to learn more about your experiences with AI in teaching. Please share your thoughts, and we may ask a couple of follow-up questions.
What is your current teaching employment status?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Long-term substitute
- Short-term/on-call substitute
- Adjunct/contingent
- Other
For which of the following tasks have you used AI tools in the past 6 months? Select all that apply.
- Lesson planning or curriculum design
- Creating assignments or assessments
- Generating instructional materials (slides, handouts, worksheets)
- Grading or providing student feedback
- Differentiating instruction for diverse learners
- Administrative tasks (emails, reports, communications)
- Research or professional learning
- Student-facing activities (tutoring tools, practice exercises)
- None of the above
- Other
Which safeguards are currently in place at your institution? Select all that apply.
- Student data privacy restrictions
- Age-based access controls
- Plagiarism/AI-detection workflows
- Required disclosure of AI use
- Allowlist or restricted list of AI tools
- Human review requirements
- None that I am aware of
- Other
Since AI tools became available, how has the time you spend on lesson planning and preparation changed?
Where do you primarily teach?
- United States
- United Kingdom
- Canada
- Australia
- European Union
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Since AI tools became available, how have concerns about academic integrity in your classes changed?
What is the highest degree you have completed?
- High school or equivalent
- Associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate/EdD/PhD
- Other
Since AI tools became available, how has your overall teaching workload changed?
What is your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Purpose-built to measure AI adoption specifics — usage frequency, specific tools/features, and task-level use cases — rather than general classroom quality, giving institutions actionable evidence-based data on AI integration.
- Captures institutional policy clarity, current safeguards, and guardrail priorities (via a dedicated ranking question), which generic education templates don't address at all.
- Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview alongside opinion-scale questions on engagement, work quality, workload, and academic integrity shifts, so open-ended nuance is captured automatically instead of left to unstructured comments.
- Spans K-12 and higher ed with teaching-level, employment-status, and tenure/demographic questions, letting institutions segment findings by educator subgroup rather than relying on a single audience template.
SurveySparrow
Classroom Observation Form Template | For Elementary LevelsThis is a fielding-ready static form aimed at elementary classroom observation, not AI adoption research — the topic overlap with our survey is limited to shared education/teacher audience. It's useful for instructional quality checks but has no content on AI tool usage, policy, or guardrails. Best viewed as an adjacent education template rather than a direct competitor for this specific research goal.
What it does well
- Focused, easy-to-deploy template tailored to elementary classroom observation workflows
- Built on SurveySparrow's survey platform, so it likely supports standard question branching and reporting
- Clear, narrow scope makes it quick for observers to complete
Where it falls short
- No content addressing AI tool usage, institutional AI policy, or classroom AI impact — off-topic for AI adoption research
- Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI option to probe open-ended educator experiences
- No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis report; results would need manual analysis
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Financial Aid Application Experience Survey
Measures student perceptions of financial aid application clarity, fairness, and support quality. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback from applicants and non-applicants within the past 12 months.
View templatePost-Launch Feature Awareness Pulse Survey
Measures awareness decay of recently launched features across user segments, identifying which communication channels sustain visibility and where messaging drop-offs occur post-launch.
View templateAI in Coursework: Student Integrity & Policy Attitudes
Measures student attitudes toward AI tool usage in academic settings, integrity concerns, and preferred institutional safeguards. Designed for higher-education administrators and faculty seeking data to inform responsible AI-use policies.
View templateEnd-of-Term Course & Instructor Evaluation
A structured end-of-term evaluation measuring student perceptions of instruction quality, course materials, workload, and pace. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback to improve course design and teaching effectiveness.
View templateAlumni Giving Intentions & Engagement Drivers Survey
Measures current students' and recent graduates' connection to their institution, giving likelihood and motivations, barriers to donation, and communication preferences to inform alumni relations and advancement strategy.
View templateRemote & Hybrid Work Experience Survey: Productivity, Well-being & Engagement
Measures employee perceptions of productivity, well-being, collaboration, and engagement across remote, hybrid, and in-office arrangements. Use this instrument to identify burnout risk factors and inform flexible-work policy decisions.
View template