AI in Coursework: Student Integrity & Policy Attitudes
Measures student attitudes toward AI tool usage in academic settings, integrity concerns, and preferred institutional safeguards. Designed for higher-education administrators and faculty seeking data to inform responsible AI-use policies.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
How familiar are you with AI tools that can be used for learning or coursework?
How concerned are you about AI-related academic integrity issues at your school?
Rank the following AI guardrails by importance to you (1 = most important).
- Require disclosure of AI use
- Allow AI for brainstorming with citation
- Redesign assignments to reduce copy-paste answers
- Use AI detection only as a flag with human review
- Limit AI on high-stakes or take-home exams
- Provide tutorials on ethical AI use
Tell us more about your experience with AI tools in your coursework. What has worked well, and what challenges have you faced?
What is your current learner status?
- High school student
- Undergraduate student
- Graduate student
- Bootcamp or online program
- Continuing education / professional development
- Not currently enrolled (independent learner)
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will help shape responsible AI policies in education. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.
Have you used any AI tool for coursework in the last 30 days?
- Yes
- No
Briefly describe any AI-related academic integrity situations you have observed or are concerned about.
How supportive are you of your school implementing formal AI-use guidelines for coursework?
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about AI's role in your learning experience.
What is your age group?
- 16–17
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55+
Which AI tools have you used for coursework in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.
- ChatGPT / OpenAI
- Google Gemini
- Microsoft Copilot (Bing/Office)
- Perplexity
- Grammarly
- Khanmigo
- GitHub Copilot
- Other
Overall, how do you view AI's role in learning?
What would help you use AI responsibly in your coursework? Select all that apply.
- Clear examples of allowed uses
- Citation and disclosure guidelines
- AI literacy workshop or module
- Built-in AI in the LMS with guardrails
- Office hours for AI questions
- Course-specific AI instructions
- Recommended safe tools list
- Other
What is your primary field of study or focus?
- Arts & Humanities
- Business & Management
- Computer Science / IT
- Data Science / Statistics
- Education
- Engineering
- Health & Medicine
- Law / Public Policy
- Natural Sciences
- Social Sciences
- Other
In the last 30 days, how often did you use AI tools for researching or gathering information for coursework?
If your school offered vetted AI tools with built-in guidelines, how likely would you be to use them?
Which region do you primarily live in?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- South America
- Prefer not to say
In the last 30 days, how often did you use AI tools for writing, editing, or paraphrasing coursework?
What is your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
In the last 30 days, how often did you use AI tools for brainstorming or generating ideas?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Purpose-built for higher-education administrators and faculty, covering AI tool usage frequency, academic integrity concerns, and support for institutional AI-use guidelines — not just generic student data.
- Includes a ranking question on AI guardrails and opinion-scale items on support for formal policies, giving administrators prioritized, policy-actionable data.
- Combines an open-text integrity-incident question with an adaptive AI follow-up interview, letting the survey probe individual students' actual experiences with AI tools in coursework rather than stopping at closed-ended answers.
- Ends with an auto-generated report design and demographic breakdowns (learner status, field of study, region, age) so results can be segmented by student population for policy targeting.
SurveySparrow
Student Information Collection Form TemplateThis is a basic student information/enrollment intake form, not a survey on AI attitudes or academic integrity. It's fielding-ready for collecting contact and enrollment details but has no content related to AI usage, integrity concerns, or policy attitudes. Useful only as a generic student-data collection reference, not a comparable attitudes study.
What it does well
- Ready-to-field static form for basic student data collection
- Likely simple to set up and customize for enrollment/contact fields
- Fits general education-audience use case on the platform
Where it falls short
- No content addressing AI tool usage, integrity, or policy attitudes — wrong subject matter entirely
- Static form fields only, no adaptive follow-up probing or AI interview capability
- No automated quality scoring or per-response analysis of open-ended input
Typeform
Student Data FormAnother general-purpose student data collection form, likely aimed at capturing demographic or administrative details rather than measuring attitudes or behaviors. It shares an education audience with QuestionPunk's template but not the subject matter — there's no indication it addresses AI use, integrity, or institutional policy. Best viewed as a data-intake form rather than a research instrument.
What it does well
- Clean, conversational form-fill experience typical of Typeform templates
- Ready to deploy for straightforward student data intake
- Likely mobile-friendly given Typeform's format
Where it falls short
- No coverage of AI tool usage, academic integrity, or policy attitudes topics
- No adaptive AI interview or voice interview options for deeper qualitative insight
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated response quality scoring
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Course Evaluation: Teaching Effectiveness & Workload
Collects structured student feedback on instructor effectiveness, course materials, workload balance, and learning outcomes to inform end-of-term course improvements at the undergraduate or graduate level.
View templateEnd-of-Term Course & Instructor Evaluation
A structured end-of-term evaluation measuring student perceptions of instruction quality, course materials, workload, and pace. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback to improve course design and teaching effectiveness.
View templateCapstone Project Support & Learning Outcomes Survey
Evaluates students' capstone project experiences—including mentorship quality, resource availability, skill development, and key challenges—to inform data-driven program improvement decisions.
View templateAlumni Giving Intentions & Engagement Drivers Survey
Measures current students' and recent graduates' connection to their institution, giving likelihood and motivations, barriers to donation, and communication preferences to inform alumni relations and advancement strategy.
View templateAcademic Integrity Climate Survey for Students
Measures student awareness of academic integrity policies, perceived peer norms around misconduct, and views on institutional interventions. Designed for education administrators and researchers seeking actionable data to strengthen integrity culture.
View templateStudent Program Recommendation & Advocacy Survey
Measures how likely students are to recommend a course, program, or instructor to a peer, what drives that willingness, and where the experience falls short. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reasons behind each student's score, surfacing concrete moments and details that a rating alone can't capture. Built for academic departments, bootcamps, and course teams tracking word-of-mouth and retention risk.
View template