Marketer Trust in Identity Resolution & Graph Accuracy
Measures marketing professionals' confidence in identity resolution accuracy, validation practices, and vendor evaluation criteria. Designed for B2B research targeting practitioners and decision-makers responsible for customer identity strategy.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which of the following best describes your current marketing role?
- Brand / Content marketing
- Performance / Demand generation
- CRM / Lifecycle / Retention
- Product marketing
- Growth / Acquisition
- Media / Advertising
- Marketing operations
- Marketing analytics / Insights
- Other (please specify)
Does your organization currently use identity resolution or a customer identity graph?
- Yes, in production
- Piloting / testing
- No, but considering
- No, not considering
- Not sure
How confident are you in the overall accuracy of your organization's identity resolution?
Which of the following methods has your organization used in the past 12 months to validate identity resolution accuracy? (Select all that apply)
- Holdout / ground-truth testing
- Manual review / spot checks
- Independent third-party audit
- Match against deterministic keys (e.g., login / email)
- Incrementality / lift experiments
- Vendor-provided accuracy proof
- Customer service feedback / returns
- Production monitoring alerts
- None of the above
Please rank the following factors from most to least important when evaluating trust in identity resolution.
- Underlying data quality and coverage
- Deterministic vs. probabilistic matching method
- Recency and freshness of the graph
- Transparency and documentation
- Independent third-party validation
- Privacy compliance and controls
- Ongoing monitoring and SLAs
How likely is your organization to evaluate or expand its identity resolution capabilities in the next 12 months?
Based on your responses in this survey, what would most increase your trust in identity graphs and match accuracy?
What is your current seniority level?
- Individual contributor
- Manager
- Director
- VP / Senior Director
- C-level / Head of Marketing
- Consultant / Agency
- Other (please specify)
Thank you for completing this survey! Your insights will help advance transparency and accuracy in identity resolution. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the research team.
Which of the following solutions support identity resolution at your organization? (Select all that apply)
- Customer Data Platform (CDP)
- Master Data Management (MDM)
- Marketing cloud suite
- Advertising ID graph (ad-tech)
- Homegrown / custom solution
- Data clean room
- CRM / DMP
- Other (please specify)
What minimum match accuracy would you require before deploying identity resolution in production?
- Below 70%
- 70–79%
- 80–89%
- 90–95%
- 96–99%
- 100% (only exact matches)
- Don't know / haven't defined a threshold
How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Match accuracy and precision
We'd like to explore your experiences with identity resolution in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.
How many years of experience do you have in marketing?
- Less than 2 years
- 2–5 years
- 6–10 years
- 11–15 years
- 16–20 years
- More than 20 years
To the best of your knowledge, approximately what percentage of your resolved identities were correct in the past 6 months?
- Below 50%
- 50–69%
- 70–79%
- 80–89%
- 90–95%
- 96–100%
- Don't know
In the past 12 months, how problematic has each of the following been for your identity resolution efforts? Duplicate or fragmented customer profiles
How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Scale and coverage of identity data
Approximately how many employees are in your company?
- 1–49
- 50–249
- 250–999
- 1,000–4,999
- 5,000+
What are the main reasons your organization is not currently using identity resolution? (Select all that apply)
- Insufficient budget
- Privacy / compliance risk
- Data quality / coverage concerns
- Integration complexity
- Lack of internal expertise
- Unclear ROI or business case
- Vendor credibility / trust
- Stakeholder misalignment
- We do not need it
- Competing priorities
- Other (please specify)
In the past 12 months, how problematic has each of the following been for your identity resolution efforts? Incorrect cross-device or cross-channel matching
How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Ease of integration with existing tech stack
Which industry best describes your organization?
- Retail / Ecommerce
- Financial services
- Technology / SaaS
- Media / Entertainment
- Healthcare / Pharma
- Travel / Hospitality
- Telecom
- Consumer packaged goods
- Automotive
- Other (please specify)
In the past 12 months, how problematic has each of the following been for your identity resolution efforts? Stale or outdated identity graph data
How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Privacy compliance certifications and controls
In which region are you primarily located?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East / Africa
In the past 12 months, how problematic has each of the following been for your identity resolution efforts? Privacy or compliance violations related to identity data
How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Transparency into matching methodology
In the past 12 months, how problematic has each of the following been for your identity resolution efforts? Lack of transparency into how matches are made
How important is each of the following when selecting an identity graph provider? Ongoing accuracy monitoring and SLAs
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Includes a dedicated adaptive AI follow-up interview segment that lets marketers elaborate on identity resolution pain points beyond fixed-choice answers
- Combines quantitative opinion-scale batteries (match accuracy confidence, vendor evaluation criteria, problem areas) with an open-text question on what would increase trust in identity resolution
- Captures firmographic and role-based segmentation (seniority, company size, industry, region) so results can be cut by respondent type
- Built for B2B practitioner research with transparent, auto-scored responses and an auto-generated report, rather than being a generic identity or demographic form
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Brand Name Testing: Memorability & Distinctiveness Evaluation
Evaluates and compares candidate brand names on memorability, distinctiveness, and category appropriateness to identify the strongest option for a product or service launch.
View templateEmail Deliverability Practices Assessment
Assesses email marketers' authentication setup, list hygiene, monitoring habits, and inbox-placement confidence to identify deliverability gaps and training needs.
View templateData Clean Room Adoption & Trust Assessment
Measures marketing professionals' awareness, trust, perceived accuracy, and adoption barriers related to data clean rooms for measurement. Ideal for ad tech vendors, industry bodies, or research teams benchmarking clean room sentiment.
View templateEntrepreneur Tool Marketing: Message Recall & Channel Effectiveness Survey
Measures unaided message recall, channel exposure, and message resonance among entrepreneurs and small-business professionals who encountered software marketing in the past four weeks. Use this to identify which channels drive the strongest awareness and behavioral intent.
View templateOnline Ad Intrusiveness & Monetization Preferences Survey
Measures perceived ad intrusiveness, relevance, tolerance thresholds, preferred ad controls, and willingness to pay for ad-free experiences among internet users to inform UX and monetization strategy.
View templateMarketing Plan Readiness & Confidence Checklist
A self-assessment for marketers, founders, and agency teams to check how complete, resourced, and confidence-inspiring their current marketing plan actually is — covering goals, audience, budget, channels, and measurement. The AI follow-up interview digs into whichever plan component the respondent flags as weakest, uncovering the real blocker instead of a generic 'needs work' answer.
View template