Identity Verification Friction & Trust Assessment
Measures ease, clarity, trust, and drop-off points across KYC/AML identity verification flows. Designed for compliance, product, and UX teams seeking to reduce verification abandonment and improve onboarding completion rates.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the past 6 months, how often have you used online or mobile financial services?
- Daily
- Weekly
- Monthly
- Less than monthly
- Not at all
The instructions at each step were clear and easy to follow.
Which, if any, issues did you encounter during verification? Select all that apply.
- Document upload failed
- Photo quality was rejected
- Camera or device didn't work as expected
- Address verification failed
- Name mismatch between documents
- Liveness/face check was confusing
- Unclear which documents were acceptable
- Timeouts or connection problems
- Concerns about data privacy
- None of the above
How satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the help or guidance available during verification?
How confident are you that your personal data is handled securely during the verification process?
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about the verification experience.
Where did you complete your most recent identity verification with us?
- Mobile app
- Desktop website
- In-branch
- Phone support
- Third-party link/integration
- Not sure
I understood which documents were required before I began.
We'd like to understand more about any friction or difficulties you experienced during verification. Please share what happened, and we may ask a few follow-up questions.
Which help resources did you use, if any? Select all that apply.
- In-app tips or tooltips
- Step-by-step guide
- Live chat
- Phone support
- Email support
- FAQ/Help center
- None of the above
Please rank the following areas from where improvement would help you most to least.
- Instructions and clarity
- Technical stability and speed
- Photo/document capture quality
- Identity matching and verification accuracy
- Help and support
- Privacy and transparency
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time — your feedback will directly help us improve the verification experience for everyone.
Approximately when did that verification take place?
- Within the last 7 days
- 8–30 days ago
- 1–3 months ago
- 4–6 months ago
- More than 6 months ago
- Not sure
I knew what to expect in terms of the steps involved and how long it would take.
Please rank the following from most to least disruptive to your verification experience.
- Unclear instructions
- Technical errors
- Strict photo/document quality requirements
- Identity match failures
- Waiting for manual review
- Privacy concerns
If you needed to verify your identity with us again, how likely would you be to complete the process?
Where do you primarily reside?
- United States
- United Kingdom
- Canada
- Australia
- European Union
- Other/Rest of world
- Prefer not to say
Did you complete the verification in one sitting?
- Yes, completed on the first attempt
- Yes, but it took multiple attempts
- No, I could not complete it
- I started but plan to finish later
When something went wrong, the error messages helped me understand what to do next.
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college/Associate
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate
- Professional degree (e.g., JD, MD)
- Prefer not to say
Approximately how long did the verification take in total?
- Less than 2 minutes
- 2–5 minutes
- 6–10 minutes
- 11–20 minutes
- More than 20 minutes
- Not sure
What is your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Unemployed and looking for work
- Not employed and not seeking
- Student
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
Overall, how easy or difficult was the verification process?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Goes beyond static satisfaction ratings by including an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into specific friction points or difficulties a respondent mentions during verification.
- Combines quantitative measures (clarity, confidence in data security, ease-of-use scales) with ranking questions that pinpoint which friction sources and improvement areas matter most.
- Captures process-level context (channel used, time taken, whether completed in one sitting, specific errors encountered) so compliance/product teams can localize drop-off causes, not just overall sentiment.
- Closes with an open-text reflection prompt and auto-generated reporting, turning raw responses into structured findings without manual coding.
Jotform
Identity Verification Form TemplateA static intake-style form for collecting identity verification submissions (e.g., document upload, personal details) rather than a survey measuring user experience or friction. Useful as a data-collection form, not as an instrument for assessing trust, clarity, or drop-off causes. No interview or follow-up mechanism is present.
What it does well
- Simple, ready-to-use form structure for collecting verification submissions
- Likely supports file/document upload fields common to KYC intake
- Easy to customize within Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to explore why friction occurred
- Not designed to measure experience-level constructs like trust, clarity, or satisfaction
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis reports
Typeform
Identity Verification Form TemplateA conversational-style static form for capturing identity verification information, benefiting from Typeform's clean one-question-at-a-time UI. It is built for data intake rather than for evaluating verification friction, trust, or abandonment points across a flow. No mechanism for deeper qualitative probing exists.
What it does well
- Polished, respondent-friendly one-question-at-a-time interface
- Simple branching logic available for basic conditional paths
- Fast to deploy for straightforward identity data collection
Where it falls short
- Lacks adaptive AI interviewing to dig into specific pain points respondents mention
- No built-in voice interview option or guided screen-share task capability
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of responses
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.