Q01
Message
All templates
Remote Exam Fairness & Privacy Perceptions Survey
Measures student perceptions of fairness, privacy, and acceptability of proctoring practices in remote exams. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking to evaluate and improve remote assessment policies.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
25 questions · ~11 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
In the last 12 months, have you taken any remote exams (proctored or unproctored)?
- Yes
- No
Q03
Dropdown
How many remote exams (including unproctored) did you complete in the last 12 months?
- 1
- 2–3
- 4–6
- 7 or more
- Prefer not to say
Q04
Multiple Choice
Which proctoring features were used in any of your remote exams? Select all that apply.
- Webcam monitoring
- Microphone/audio capture
- Screen sharing or recording
- Room scan (pan the camera)
- Photo ID verification
- Browser lockdown or site whitelist
- Keystroke/typing analysis
- Not sure / Don't remember
Q05
Opinion Scale
Overall, how fair did your remote exams feel compared with in-person exams?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Much less fairMax:Much more fair
Q06
Opinion Scale
How intrusive did the proctoring feel during your remote exams?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not at all intrusiveMax:Extremely intrusive
Q07
Ranking
Please rank the following aspects of remote exams from most important to least important to you.
- Fair grading accuracy
- Academic integrity (preventing cheating)
- Student privacy
- Accessibility and accommodations
- Technical reliability
- Clear communication from the provider
- Convenience/flexibility
Drag to rank
Q08
Long Text
Based on your responses in this survey, what changes would most improve fairness and privacy in remote exams?
Q09
Dropdown
What is your age?
- Under 18
- 18–20
- 21–24
- 25–29
- 30–39
- 40–49
- 50 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q10
Message
Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses are confidential and will be used to improve remote exam policies. Your participation is greatly appreciated.
Q11
Multiple Choice
Which types of remote exams did you take in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Live human proctor via webcam
- AI-automated proctoring
- Unproctored (no proctor)
- Open-book allowed
- Not sure / Don't remember
Q12
Opinion Scale
The exam rules and expectations were clearly communicated before the exam.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q13
Opinion Scale
The exam provider clearly explained how my data would be stored and used.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q14
AI Interview
We'd like to understand more about your experiences with fairness and privacy in remote exams. Please share your thoughts, and our AI moderator will ask a few follow-up questions.
Q15
Multiple Choice
Which best describes your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
Q16
Opinion Scale
The exam format gave me a fair opportunity to demonstrate my knowledge.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q17
Opinion Scale
I felt confident that my personal data was handled securely during the exam.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q18
Dropdown
Where do you primarily study?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- South America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
Q19
Opinion Scale
All students had equal access to the resources needed for the exam.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q20
Ranking
Rank these proctoring practices from most acceptable to least acceptable to you.
- Photo ID verification
- Webcam on during exam
- Screen sharing/recording
- Room scan
- Recording the entire session
Drag to rank
Q21
Dropdown
What is your current highest level of education?
- Secondary/High school
- Vocational/Technical
- Some college/Undergraduate in progress
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate/Professional (Master's/PhD/MD/etc.)
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q22
Opinion Scale
The grading felt consistent and unbiased.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q23
Multiple Choice
What is your current enrollment status?
- Full-time student
- Part-time student
- Not currently enrolled (completed within last 12 months)
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q24
Opinion Scale
Compared with in-person settings, how prevalent do you believe cheating was in your remote exams?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Much less prevalentMax:Much more prevalent
Q25
Dropdown
What is your primary field of study?
- STEM (e.g., CS, Engineering, Math, Natural Sciences)
- Social Sciences
- Arts & Humanities
- Business/Economics
- Health & Medicine
- Education
- Other
- Prefer not to say
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- AI interviewer creates a non-judgmental conversational space that encourages honest disclosure on sensitive topics like safety fears and academic dishonesty
- Every AI prompt, model, and logic flow is fully transparent and logged—critical for IRB compliance and reproducible campus climate research
- Customizable AI personality lets researchers adjust tone for sensitive topics while maintaining methodological consistency across administrations
Jotform
Academic Integrity Form TemplateDesigned as a policy acknowledgment form rather than a climate survey—students sign to confirm they understand academic honesty expectations. Useful for compliance but does not assess the actual climate of integrity on campus.
What it does well
- E-signature collection via Jotform Sign for formal student acknowledgment
- Easy embedding within LMS or institutional websites with custom CSS
Where it falls short
- Not a survey at all—it's a compliance/acknowledgment form, not a climate assessment tool
- No questions exploring student attitudes, peer norms, or perceived institutional response to dishonesty
- No AI-powered interviewing to sensitively explore why students may or may not engage in academic dishonesty
Jotform
Academic Honesty Form TemplateAnother compliance-oriented form for students to acknowledge academic honesty policies. Keeps digital records of student acknowledgments but doesn't measure the climate of integrity or explore student attitudes.
What it does well
- Digital record-keeping with database storage for easy sorting and searching
- Helps schools maintain documentation that students understand policy repercussions
Where it falls short
- Compliance form, not a research instrument—cannot assess campus integrity climate
- No mechanism to explore peer norms, pressure to cheat, or perceived fairness of enforcement
- No AI follow-ups to sensitively probe attitudes toward academic dishonesty
Qualtrics
Student & Staff Experience Management for EducationComprehensive education experience platform trusted by 1,800+ institutions for climate surveys, safety assessments, and multi-channel feedback. Powerful but enterprise-priced and operates as a platform rather than offering specific ready-to-use campus safety or integrity templates publicly.
What it does well
- Enterprise-grade platform trusted by 1,800+ educational institutions with FedRAMP and ISO certifications
- Multi-channel data collection including surveys, social media, call centers, and online reviews
Where it falls short
- Enterprise pricing requires custom quotes—prohibitive for individual researchers or departments
- AI features lack the prompt-level transparency needed for IRB-compliant reproducible research
- No publicly available ready-to-use campus safety or academic integrity survey templates
SurveyMonkey
University Student Satisfaction Survey TemplateIncludes campus safety as one dimension within a broader student satisfaction framework. Not a dedicated safety or integrity climate instrument—safety is covered by a few items rather than explored in depth.
What it does well
- Covers campus safety alongside academic advising, student services, and registration in one instrument
- Benchmarkable questions developed in partnership with U.S. Department of Education
Where it falls short
- Campus safety is a minor component—not a dedicated safety assessment with emergency communication evaluation
- No dedicated academic integrity climate questions whatsoever
- No AI capability to follow up on reported safety concerns or explore unreported incidents
SurveySparrow
Student Engagement Survey TemplateGeneral student engagement template with conversational UI and multiple question types. Does not specifically address campus safety or academic integrity, though the platform supports building custom surveys on these topics.
What it does well
- Conversational survey interface with tap-friendly question types that boost response rates
- Recurring survey scheduling for longitudinal campus climate tracking
Where it falls short
- No campus safety or academic integrity-specific template available
- No AI-powered follow-ups to sensitively explore safety incidents or integrity violations
- No methodology guidance for handling sensitive topics like harassment reporting or cheating norms
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.