All Templates

Evaluation Fairness & Representation Perceptions Survey for Developers

Measures software developers' perceptions of fairness, bias, and representativeness in their evaluation practices. Ideal for engineering leadership and DEI teams seeking to identify gaps in evaluation methodology and build more inclusive processes.

What's Included

AI-Powered Questions

Intelligent follow-up questions based on responses

Automated Analysis

Real-time sentiment and insight detection

Smart Distribution

Target the right audience automatically

Detailed Reports

Comprehensive insights and recommendations

Template Overview

28

Questions

AI-Powered

Smart Analysis

Ready-to-Use

Launch in Minutes

This professionally designed survey template helps you gather valuable insights with intelligent question flow and automated analysis.

Sample Survey Items

Q1
Chat Message
Welcome! This survey explores your experiences and perspectives on fairness, bias, and representativeness in software and model evaluations. Your participation is completely voluntary and you may stop at any time. All responses are anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. Estimated time: 8–10 minutes.
Q2
Multiple Choice
Which best describes your primary development focus?
  • Frontend
  • Backend
  • ML/AI
  • Data engineering/MLOps
  • Mobile
  • DevOps/SRE
  • Security
  • Full-stack
  • QA/Test automation
  • Other (please specify)
Q3
Multiple Choice
Have you been involved in evaluating software, systems, or models in the last 12 months?
  • Yes, in the last 6 months
  • Yes, 6–12 months ago
  • Yes, over a year ago
  • No
Q4
Dropdown
In a typical month, approximately how much of your time is spent on evaluation activities?
  • 0–10%
  • 11–25%
  • 26–50%
  • 51–75%
  • 76–100%
  • Prefer not to say
Q5
Multiple Choice
Which evaluation method did you rely on most in the last 6 months?
  • Unit tests/assertions
  • Offline benchmarks
  • Human ratings/annotation
  • A/B or canary releases
  • Synthetic data tests
  • Red-teaming/adversarial testing
  • Bias/fairness audits
  • Other (please specify)
  • None/Not applicable
Q6
Multiple Choice
In your recent evaluations, did you consider sensitive attributes (e.g., gender, ethnicity, income)?
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not applicable
Q7
Multiple Choice
Which safeguard was most important when handling sensitive attributes in your evaluations?
  • IRB/ethics review
  • Legal/privacy review
  • Data minimization
  • Aggregation/anonymization
  • Differential privacy or noise
  • Limited access/approvals
  • Stakeholder consent
  • Bias detection/remediation
  • Other (please specify)
  • Not applicable
Q8
Opinion Scale
How important is fairness in your evaluation decisions?
Range: 1 7
Min: Not at all importantMid: NeutralMax: Extremely important
Q9
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree: Our evaluation criteria are applied consistently across different user groups.
Range: 1 7
Min: Strongly disagreeMid: NeutralMax: Strongly agree
Q10
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree: I have adequate tools and methods to detect bias in evaluation outcomes.
Range: 1 7
Min: Strongly disagreeMid: NeutralMax: Strongly agree
Q11
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree: Stakeholders from diverse backgrounds are involved in designing our evaluations.
Range: 1 7
Min: Strongly disagreeMid: NeutralMax: Strongly agree
Q12
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree: Fairness considerations sometimes conflict with other priorities such as speed or cost.
Range: 1 7
Min: Strongly disagreeMid: NeutralMax: Strongly agree
Q13
Long Text
In one or two sentences, how do you define a "fair" evaluation?
Max chars
Q14
Opinion Scale
How concerned are you that unrepresentative samples may have affected your evaluation results in the last 12 months?
Range: 1 7
Min: Not at all concernedMid: NeutralMax: Extremely concerned
Q15
Multiple Choice
Which sampling strategy did you use most often in the last 12 months?
  • Random sampling
  • Stratified sampling
  • User segment quotas
  • Synthetic augmentation
  • Convenience/availability sampling
  • Production traffic replay
  • Telemetry-driven sampling
  • Other (please specify)
  • None/Not applicable
Q16
Ranking
Rank the following segments by priority for coverage in your evaluations (top = highest priority).
Drag to order (top = most important)
  1. New users
  2. Power users
  3. Underrepresented regions/locales
  4. Low-resource devices
  5. Harm-sensitive contexts
  6. Long-tail queries
Q17
Dropdown
Approximately what minimum sample size do you typically need to trust a feature-level evaluation decision?
  • Under 100
  • 100–499
  • 500–999
  • 1,000–4,999
  • 5,000–9,999
  • 10,000+
  • I don't have a specific threshold
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
Opinion Scale
How confident are you that your evaluations fairly represent real-world use?
Range: 1 7
Min: Not at all confidentMid: NeutralMax: Extremely confident
Q19
Long Text
If you faced any trade-offs between accuracy, speed, and fairness in recent evaluations, please briefly describe them.
Max chars
Q20
Long Text
Based on your responses in this survey, what would most improve fairness and representativeness in your evaluations?
Max chars
Q21
AI Interview
We'd like to explore your thoughts on fairness and representativeness in evaluations a bit further. Please share your perspective and our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions.
AI InterviewLength: 2Personality: [Object Object]Mode: Fast
Reference questions: 5
Q22
Dropdown
How many years of professional development experience do you have?
  • Less than 1
  • 1–3
  • 4–6
  • 7–10
  • 11–15
  • 16+
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
Multiple Choice
What is your current seniority level?
  • Student/Intern
  • Junior/Associate
  • Mid-level
  • Senior
  • Staff/Principal
  • Manager/Lead
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
Dropdown
Which region do you primarily work in?
  • Africa
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
Dropdown
Approximately how many employees are in your organization?
  • 1
  • 2–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–10,000
  • 10,001+
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
Dropdown
How many people are on the team you primarily work with?
  • 1
  • 2–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • 21–50
  • 51+
  • Prefer not to say
Q27
Dropdown
What is your primary industry or domain?
  • Consumer software
  • Enterprise/B2B
  • Finance/Fintech
  • Healthcare
  • Education
  • E-commerce
  • Gaming
  • Government/Public sector
  • Research/Academia
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q28
Chat Message
Thank you for completing the survey! Your responses are anonymous and will be used in aggregate to improve evaluation practices. We appreciate your time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is QuestionPunk?
QuestionPunk is an AI-powered survey and research platform that turns traditional surveys into adaptive conversations. Describe your research goal and get a complete survey draft, conduct AI-moderated interviews with dynamic follow-ups, detect low-quality responses, and produce insights automatically. It's fast, flexible, and scalable across qualitative and quantitative research.
How do I create my first survey?
Sign up, then choose how to build: describe your research goal and let AI generate a survey, pick a template, or start from scratch. Add question types, set logic, preview, and share.
Can the AI generate a survey from a prompt?
Yes. Describe your research goal in plain language and QuestionPunk drafts a complete survey with appropriate question types, ordering, and AI follow-up logic. You can then customize before publishing.
What question types are available?
QuestionPunk supports a wide range of question types: opinion scale, rating, multiple choice, dropdown, ranking, matrix, constant sum, AI interview (text and audio), long text, short text, email, phone, date, address, website, numeric, audio/video recording, contact form, chat message, conversation reset, button, page breaks, and more.
How do AI interviews work?
AI interviews conduct adaptive conversations with respondents. The AI asks follow-up questions based on what the respondent says, probing for clarity and depth. You control the personality, tone, model (Haiku, Sonnet, or Opus), and question mode (fixed count, AI decides when to stop, or time-based).
Can I test my survey before launching?
Yes. Use synthetic testing to create AI personas and run them through your survey. This helps catch issues with question flow, logic, and wording before real respondents see it.
How many languages are supported?
QuestionPunk supports 142+ languages. Add languages from the survey editor, auto-translate questions, and share language-specific links. AI interviews also adapt to the respondent's language automatically.
How can I share my survey?
Share via a direct link (with optional custom slug), embed on your website (iframe or script), distribute through Prolific for research panels, or generate a QR code for physical distribution.
Can I export survey results?
Yes. Export as CSV (flat or wide layout), Excel (XLSX), or export the survey structure as PDF/Word. Filter by suspicious level, response type, language, or date range before exporting.
Does QuestionPunk detect fraudulent responses?
Yes. Every response is automatically classified with a suspicious level (low/medium/high) based on attention checks, response timing, and behavioral signals. You can filter flagged responses in the Responses tab.
What are the pricing plans?
Basic (Free): 20 responses/month. Business ($50/month or $500/year): 5,000 responses/month with priority support. Enterprise (Custom): unlimited responses, remove branding, custom domain, and dedicated support.
How long does support take to reply?
We reply within 24 hours, often much sooner. Include key details in your message to help us assist you faster.

Ready to Get Started?

Launch your survey in minutes with this pre-built template