AI Transparency, Control & Recourse Assessment
Measures user attitudes toward AI transparency, desired controls, and recourse expectations. Designed for product teams assessing trust gaps and prioritizing AI governance improvements.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the past 3 months, have you used any AI-powered features (e.g., chatbots, smart suggestions, AI-generated summaries)?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
Overall, how comfortable are you using products that include AI-powered features?
How important is it to you to know when a product is using AI to generate or influence results?
How much control do you want over how AI features work in products you use?
If an AI feature produced an incorrect result that affected you, what would you do first?
- Use an undo or retry option
- Look for an explanation of why the result occurred
- Report the issue through the product
- Contact human support
- Request a formal appeal or second review
- Ignore it and continue
We'd like to explore your experiences and opinions about AI features in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a few follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for participating in this survey! Your responses will help improve how AI features are designed and communicated. All answers are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.
Which of the following AI features have you used in the past 3 months? Select all that apply.
- Chatbots or virtual assistants (e.g., customer support)
- AI-generated summaries or writing tools
- Autocomplete or smart compose
- Personalized recommendations (e.g., content, products)
- Image generation or editing
- Voice assistants (e.g., Siri, Alexa)
- Face or voice recognition (e.g., device unlock)
- Language translation
- Content moderation or filters
- Other
How much do you trust AI-powered features to produce accurate and fair results?
How important is it to you to understand how an AI feature arrived at a specific result or recommendation?
Which of the following AI controls would you actually use on a regular basis? Select all that apply.
- Turn AI features on or off at any time
- Opt in or out of specific AI features individually
- View a 'Why this result?' explanation
- See and edit the data the AI used about me
- Give feedback to improve AI results
- Undo or roll back AI-made changes
- Set risk sensitivity or thresholds
- Request a human review of AI decisions
In the past 12 months, have you sought help or filed a complaint about an issue caused by an AI feature?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about transparency, control, or issue resolution in AI-powered features. (Optional)
How do you describe your gender?
- Man
- Woman
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
How important is it to you to know what personal data an AI feature uses?
Please rank the following AI feature qualities from most important (top) to least important (bottom) to you.
- Accuracy of results
- Transparency about how it works
- User control over settings
- Speed of results
- Privacy of personal data
- Clear explanations of outputs
How helpful was the support or resolution process you experienced?
In which country do you currently reside?
- United States
- United Kingdom
- Canada
- Australia
- India
- Germany
- Brazil
- France
- Japan
- Other
How important is it to you to see a confidence level or certainty score for AI-generated results?
If you have had a negative experience with an AI feature, what one thing would have improved the situation most? (Optional)
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
In your opinion, when should products disclose that AI is being used?
- On first use of any AI feature
- Every time an AI-generated result is shown
- In settings only
- In the privacy policy only
- Only if the AI may affect important outcomes (e.g., financial, health)
- Disclosure is not necessary
What is your current employment status?
- Full-time employed
- Part-time employed
- Self-employed
- Student
- Unemployed and looking for work
- Not working by choice
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Edge AI Governance & Monitoring Maturity Assessment
Assesses organizational readiness across edge AI governance, monitoring, risk, and MLOps practices. Designed for AI/ML leaders, DevOps, and compliance stakeholders to benchmark maturity and prioritize investment.
View templateData Labeling QA, Bias & Instruction Clarity Audit
An operational audit survey for data labeling teams, measuring instruction clarity, bias mitigation practices, QA rigor, and workflow bottlenecks over the last 30 days. Designed for labelers, reviewers, and QA leads.
View templateAI Content Watermark Perception & Trust Survey
Measures consumer awareness, trust, acceptability, and behavioral intentions regarding AI content provenance watermarks, designed for technology policy researchers and platform designers evaluating labeling strategies.
View templateAR Virtual Try-On Realism & Purchase Confidence Study
Measures perceived realism, fit accuracy, and purchase confidence for augmented reality try-on features. Designed for e-commerce UX researchers seeking to identify AR experience gaps that drive returns and reduce conversion.
View templateRed Team Program Effectiveness Assessment
Collects structured stakeholder feedback on red-team risk coverage, report quality, and remediation follow-through to identify actionable program improvements across security, engineering, and leadership functions.
View templateAI Disclosure & Transparency Expectations Survey
Measures consumer expectations for AI transparency across products and services, capturing preferred disclosure methods, acceptability thresholds, and trust drivers to inform product labeling and policy decisions.
View template