All templates
Product & UX

Neurodivergent Digital Accessibility & UX Barriers Assessment

Identifies specific design barriers, sensory preferences, and accessibility feature priorities for neurodivergent users. Designed for UX research teams seeking actionable insights to improve digital product inclusivity.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

21 questions · ~10 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to this study on digital accessibility and user experience. We are interested in understanding how people interact with apps and websites, and what design choices make them easier or harder to use. This survey takes approximately 8 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest experience. All responses are confidential, anonymized, and will only be reported in aggregate for research purposes. By continuing, you agree to participate in this study.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Do you identify as neurodivergent (e.g., ADHD, autism, dyslexia, dyspraxia, or another neurodivergent condition)?

  • Yes
  • Not sure, but I think so
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q03
Multiple Choice

Which of the following devices do you use at least once a week to access apps or websites? (Select all that apply.)

  • Smartphone
  • Laptop or desktop computer
  • Tablet
  • Smartwatch
  • Screen reader or other assistive technology
  • Game console
  • Smart TV
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
Multiple Choice

Which of the following interface elements, if any, make it harder for you to focus or complete tasks? (Select all that apply.)

  • Auto-playing video or audio
  • Animated effects or motion
  • High contrast or bright colors
  • Dense blocks of text
  • Small touch targets
  • Unexpected pop-ups or modals
  • Tight line spacing
  • Complex or unclear labels
  • None of these
  • Other (please specify)
Q05
Opinion Scale

How easy is it for you to fill out multi-step forms (e.g., registration, checkout) on apps or websites?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q06
AI Interview

Think about the past 30 days. Can you describe a specific time when a digital interface was frustrating or difficult to use? What happened, and what made it hard?

Q07
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like design teams to know about making apps and websites easier for you to use?

Q08
Dropdown

What is your age range?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
Message

Thank you for sharing your experiences. Your feedback will directly inform design decisions that make digital products more accessible and inclusive.

Q10
Multiple Choice

If you're comfortable sharing, which of the following apply to you? (Select all that apply.)

  • ADHD
  • Autism spectrum
  • Dyslexia
  • Dyspraxia / DCD
  • Dyscalculia
  • Tourette syndrome
  • Sensory processing differences
  • Other neurodivergent condition
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
Opinion Scale

Overall, how easy to use were the apps and websites you used most in the past 30 days?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q12
Multiple Choice

How do you prefer information to be presented in apps or websites? (Select all that apply.)

  • Short bullet lists
  • Step-by-step sequences
  • Visual icons or illustrations
  • Short videos with captions
  • Text with concrete examples
  • Audio narration
  • Summary at the top
  • Expandable or collapsible sections
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
Opinion Scale

How easy is it for you to navigate websites that use dropdown menus or nested navigation?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q14
Multiple Choice

What tools, settings, or personal strategies do you currently use to make apps and websites easier for you? (Select all that apply.)

  • Browser extensions (e.g., ad blocker, dark mode)
  • Built-in OS accessibility settings
  • Screen reader or text-to-speech
  • Custom font or text size settings
  • Focus or reading mode in the browser
  • Keyboard shortcuts instead of mouse
  • Noise-canceling headphones while using devices
  • Taking breaks during complex tasks
  • None
  • Other (please specify)
Q15
Multiple Choice

Which gender do you identify with?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
Opinion Scale

When viewing content on a screen, how much information do you prefer to see at once?

Scale: 17
Min:Very little — lots of white spaceMax:A lot — everything visible at once
Q17
Ranking

Please rank the following accessibility features from most helpful to least helpful for you (drag to reorder).

  1. Dark mode or theme options
  2. Adjustable text size and spacing
  3. Reduce motion setting
  4. Keyboard navigation support
  5. Clear headings and landmarks
Drag to rank
Q18
Multiple Choice

Which of the following feedback methods are you comfortable using in apps or websites? (Select all that apply.)

  • In-app thumbs up/down
  • One-question pop-up
  • Short survey (under 3 minutes)
  • Open text box
  • Screen recording with blur options
  • Live chat with an agent
  • Email follow-up
  • None of these
Q19
Dropdown

In which region do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
Dropdown

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college or technical training
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
Dropdown

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Unemployed
  • Not currently working due to disability or health
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Directly screens for neurodivergent identity (ADHD, autism, dyslexia, dyspraxia, etc.) and asks which specific conditions/traits apply, so insights are grounded in real respondent context rather than assumed personas
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that asks respondents to describe a specific recent moment a digital interaction created a barrier, letting the AI adaptively probe for detail instead of relying only on fixed-choice answers
  • Pairs opinion-scale questions on ease of forms, navigation, and information density with a ranking task on accessibility feature priorities, giving UX teams both severity data and a clear prioritization order for fixes
  • Closes with an open-text reflection question and produces an auto-generated report, combining qualitative nuance with structured output UX researchers can act on without manual transcript coding

Jotform

Digital Product Development Form Template

A generic, fielding-ready form for gathering feedback on digital product development rather than accessibility or neurodivergent UX specifically. It's built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, so it's easy to customize but not pre-loaded with disability- or sensory-focused questions.

What it does well

  • Quick drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's builder
  • Broad integration with Jotform's form ecosystem (payments, notifications, etc.)
  • Free tier available for basic use

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents only see static, pre-written fields
  • No neurodivergent-specific screening or sensory/accessibility question set
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

Typeform

Digital Product Development Form Template

A conversational-style form for general digital product feedback, not tailored to accessibility barriers or neurodivergent users. It's ready to field as-is, with Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time flow, but the question set is generic product development, not disability-specific.

What it does well

  • Conversational, one-question-at-a-time interface that's mobile-friendly
  • Easy visual customization of branding and question flow
  • Established reputation for higher completion rates on shorter forms

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI interviewing or voice AI interview option
  • No built-in neurodivergent identity screening or accessibility-feature ranking
  • No automated report generation tied to per-response quality scoring

QuestionPro

Product/Service Design Survey Template

A broader product/service design survey template aimed at general design feedback rather than accessibility or neurodivergent-specific UX barriers. It's a fielding-ready survey with QuestionPro's standard logic and reporting tools, but the content isn't customized for disability or sensory research.

What it does well

  • Enterprise-grade survey logic (skip/branch logic, quotas)
  • Built-in analytics dashboard for cross-tabulation
  • Wide range of question types for general product research

Where it falls short

  • Static question design with no adaptive AI or voice interview capability
  • No accessibility feature ranking or neurodivergent condition screening included
  • No transparent AI prompt methodology since there's no AI interviewing component

SurveyMonkey

Market Research Product Survey Questions

A general market-research product survey focused on customer satisfaction and product-market fit, not on accessibility or neurodivergent UX barriers. It's a ready-to-use template, but it's positioned for broad market research rather than inclusive design research.

What it does well

  • Large, well-known template library with broad market-research framing
  • Straightforward distribution and response collection tools
  • Basic analytics and reporting included

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing or voice AI option
  • No neurodivergent-specific screening, sensory preference, or accessibility-feature ranking questions
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Product & UX

MVP Usability & Value Proposition Assessment

Captures early adopter feedback on task completion ease, perceived value, bugs, and improvement priorities to inform MVP iteration decisions for product teams.

View template
Product & UX

Mobile App Navigation & Discoverability UX Survey

Measures user expectations and pain points for tab bars, gestures, menus, and feature discoverability in mobile apps. Designed for UX researchers seeking actionable insights to optimize mobile navigation patterns.

View template
Product & UX

Cross-Device UX Evaluation: Gestures, Layout & Accessibility

Measures user experience across mobile, tablet, and desktop devices, focusing on gesture usability, layout navigation, readability, accessibility feature usage, and cross-device consistency. Designed for UX research teams evaluating responsive design quality.

View template
Product & UX

Product Integration Priorities & Gaps Assessment

A structured survey for active product users to evaluate current integration usage, identify unmet needs, and prioritize capabilities — providing actionable data for roadmap planning.

View template
Product & UX

Cross-Locale Format Interpretation & Preference Survey

Measures how users across world regions interpret and prefer date, time, number, and currency display formats, providing product and UX teams with actionable localization insights to reduce ambiguity and formatting errors.

View template
Product & UX

Product Feature Impact & Priority Survey

Collects structured customer input on feature preferences scored by impact, urgency, and usage frequency to inform product roadmap prioritization decisions.

View template