Power Analysis Parameter Intake Survey
A structured intake instrument for statisticians and researchers to systematically document effect size, variance, design, and attrition assumptions needed to conduct power and sample size calculations.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
What is the primary study area?
- Biomedical / Clinical
- Public Health
- Social Science
- Education
- Economics
- Psychology / Behavioral
- Engineering
- Other
Which effect metric will the power analysis use?
- Mean difference
- Standardized mean difference (Cohen's d)
- Odds ratio
- Risk ratio
- Risk difference
- Hazard ratio
- Rate ratio
- Correlation coefficient
- Change-score difference
What is the assumed distribution for the primary outcome?
- Normal
- Binomial
- Poisson
- Negative binomial
- Log-normal
- Exponential
- Weibull
How many arms or groups does your study design include?
- 1 (single-group)
- 2
- 3
- 4 or more
What is the planned follow-up duration? (Please state the number and unit — e.g., '12 weeks', '6 months'.)
Overall, how confident are you in the accuracy of the assumptions you provided in this survey?
Thank you for the details you've provided so far. I'd like to ask a couple of follow-up questions to clarify any gaps in your study assumptions — particularly around your variance estimates, design trade-offs, or feasibility constraints.
Based on your responses in this survey, is there any additional context, assumptions, or constraints we should consider for your power analysis?
What is your primary role or discipline?
- Biostatistician
- Epidemiologist
- Clinical researcher
- Social scientist
- Data analyst
- Student / trainee
- Other
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will be used to tailor an appropriate power and sample size analysis plan for your study. If you have questions, please contact your study statistician or the research team.
What is the primary outcome type?
- Continuous
- Binary / Proportion (0–1)
- Count
- Time-to-event (survival)
- Ordinal
- Other
What is the planned effect size? (Enter the numeric value in your chosen metric — e.g., 0.3 for Cohen's d, 1.5 for an odds ratio.)
If your primary outcome is continuous, what is the assumed standard deviation? (Enter the value in outcome units; leave blank if not applicable.)
What is the planned allocation ratio across groups?
- 1:1
- 2:1
- 1:2
- 1:1:1
- Other
What is the expected attrition or loss-to-follow-up rate over the full analysis window? (Enter a proportion between 0 and 1 — e.g., 0.15 for 15%.)
What sources informed these estimates? (Select all that apply.)
- Pilot data
- Prior RCT
- Observational dataset
- Systematic review / meta-analysis
- Registry / EMR
- Expert judgment
- Feasibility constraints
How many years of experience do you have with study design or analysis?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–7 years
- 8–15 years
- 16+ years
What is the minimum detectable effect (MDE) you consider practically meaningful? (Use the same metric and units as your planned effect size.)
If your primary outcome is binary, what is the expected control-group event rate? (Enter a proportion between 0 and 1; leave blank if not applicable.)
What significance level (alpha) will you use? (e.g., 0.05, 0.01)
The attrition rate you entered above is expressed per:
- Week
- Month
- Entire follow-up period
Please provide any additional citations, datasets, or notes relevant to the assumptions you reported above.
Which region are you primarily based in?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- South America
- Oceania
- Middle East
- Multiple / Other
What is the unit for the effect size? (e.g., mmHg, points; enter 'standardized' if unitless.)
What are the source(s) for your variance or event-rate assumptions? (e.g., pilot data, literature, registry — please include citations or links where possible.)
What is your target statistical power? (e.g., 0.80, 0.90)
How do you plan to handle missing data? (Select all that apply.)
- Complete-case analysis
- Multiple imputation
- Maximum likelihood / mixed models
- Inverse probability weighting
- Last observation carried forward
- Other (please specify)
What type of organization do you primarily work in?
- University / Academic
- Hospital / Health system
- Government
- Industry / Pharma
- Nonprofit / NGO
- Independent consultant
- Other
Will the primary hypothesis test be one-sided or two-sided?
- Two-sided
- One-sided
What country are you primarily based in? (Optional)
Is the design clustered or cluster-randomized?
- No
- Yes
If your design is clustered, what is the assumed intra-class correlation (ICC)? (Enter a value between 0 and 1.)
If your design is clustered, what is the expected average cluster size?
Does the study involve repeated measures or longitudinal outcomes?
- No
- Yes
If your study has repeated measures, what is the assumed within-subject correlation (rho)? (Enter a value between 0 and 1.)
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Systematically captures every parameter a statistician needs for a power/sample size calculation — effect size, MDE, variance/event-rate assumptions, design (arms, allocation ratio, clustering, repeated measures), alpha/power, and attrition — in one structured instrument
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that can probe inconsistencies or ask for clarification on the assumptions provided, something a static form cannot do
- Collects methodological provenance (source of variance/event-rate assumptions, citations, confidence rating) so downstream analysts can audit the inputs rather than just receiving raw numbers
- Closes with an open-text prompt for additional context/assumptions plus respondent background (role, experience, region, organization type), giving the analyst calibration context on who supplied the estimates
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Post-Study Informed Consent Comprehension Assessment
Assesses whether research participants understood key elements of informed consent—study purpose, risks, data handling, and participant rights. Designed for post-study administration to support IRB compliance and iterative improvement of consent materials.
View templateCourse Communication & Support Effectiveness Survey
Measures student perceptions of messaging timeliness, channel preference, and support quality in online or fintech cohort programs to identify actionable communication improvements.
View templateMixed-Methods Integration Quality Assessment
A team-level diagnostic for mixed-methods research projects, evaluating convergence, divergence, and integration rigor across qualitative and quantitative strands to guide analytic next steps.
View templateStimulus Comprehension & Manipulation Check Assessment
A research-grade instrument for verifying that experimental participants correctly perceived, understood, and interpreted a presented stimulus. Designed for researchers conducting experiments who need to validate manipulation fidelity and comprehension before analyzing dependent variables.
View templateResearch Participant Eligibility & Informed Consent Screener
Screens prospective research participants for eligibility and verifies comprehension of informed consent elements before enrollment in an academic study.
View templateFinancial Aid Application Experience Survey
Measures student perceptions of financial aid application clarity, fairness, and support quality. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback from applicants and non-applicants within the past 12 months.
View template