All templates
Education & Academic

Power Analysis Parameter Intake Survey

A structured intake instrument for statisticians and researchers to systematically document effect size, variance, design, and attrition assumptions needed to conduct power and sample size calculations.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

36 questions · ~15 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the Power Analysis & Sample Size Planning Survey. This survey collects the assumptions and parameters needed to conduct a power or sample size analysis for your study. Your responses will be used solely to inform your analysis plan and will be kept confidential. There are no right or wrong answers — best estimates are perfectly acceptable. The survey takes approximately 8–12 minutes. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time.

Q02
Dropdown

What is the primary study area?

  • Biomedical / Clinical
  • Public Health
  • Social Science
  • Education
  • Economics
  • Psychology / Behavioral
  • Engineering
  • Other
Q03
Multiple Choice

Which effect metric will the power analysis use?

  • Mean difference
  • Standardized mean difference (Cohen's d)
  • Odds ratio
  • Risk ratio
  • Risk difference
  • Hazard ratio
  • Rate ratio
  • Correlation coefficient
  • Change-score difference
Q04
Multiple Choice

What is the assumed distribution for the primary outcome?

  • Normal
  • Binomial
  • Poisson
  • Negative binomial
  • Log-normal
  • Exponential
  • Weibull
Q05
Dropdown

How many arms or groups does your study design include?

  • 1 (single-group)
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4 or more
Q06
Long Text

What is the planned follow-up duration? (Please state the number and unit — e.g., '12 weeks', '6 months'.)

Q07
Opinion Scale

Overall, how confident are you in the accuracy of the assumptions you provided in this survey?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q08
AI Interview

Thank you for the details you've provided so far. I'd like to ask a couple of follow-up questions to clarify any gaps in your study assumptions — particularly around your variance estimates, design trade-offs, or feasibility constraints.

Q09
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, is there any additional context, assumptions, or constraints we should consider for your power analysis?

Q10
Multiple Choice

What is your primary role or discipline?

  • Biostatistician
  • Epidemiologist
  • Clinical researcher
  • Social scientist
  • Data analyst
  • Student / trainee
  • Other
Q11
Message

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will be used to tailor an appropriate power and sample size analysis plan for your study. If you have questions, please contact your study statistician or the research team.

Q12
Multiple Choice

What is the primary outcome type?

  • Continuous
  • Binary / Proportion (0–1)
  • Count
  • Time-to-event (survival)
  • Ordinal
  • Other
Q13
Long Text

What is the planned effect size? (Enter the numeric value in your chosen metric — e.g., 0.3 for Cohen's d, 1.5 for an odds ratio.)

Q14
Long Text

If your primary outcome is continuous, what is the assumed standard deviation? (Enter the value in outcome units; leave blank if not applicable.)

Q15
Dropdown

What is the planned allocation ratio across groups?

  • 1:1
  • 2:1
  • 1:2
  • 1:1:1
  • Other
Q16
Long Text

What is the expected attrition or loss-to-follow-up rate over the full analysis window? (Enter a proportion between 0 and 1 — e.g., 0.15 for 15%.)

Q17
Multiple Choice

What sources informed these estimates? (Select all that apply.)

  • Pilot data
  • Prior RCT
  • Observational dataset
  • Systematic review / meta-analysis
  • Registry / EMR
  • Expert judgment
  • Feasibility constraints
Q18
Dropdown

How many years of experience do you have with study design or analysis?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–3 years
  • 4–7 years
  • 8–15 years
  • 16+ years
Q19
Long Text

What is the minimum detectable effect (MDE) you consider practically meaningful? (Use the same metric and units as your planned effect size.)

Q20
Long Text

If your primary outcome is binary, what is the expected control-group event rate? (Enter a proportion between 0 and 1; leave blank if not applicable.)

Q21
Long Text

What significance level (alpha) will you use? (e.g., 0.05, 0.01)

Q22
Dropdown

The attrition rate you entered above is expressed per:

  • Week
  • Month
  • Entire follow-up period
Q23
Long Text

Please provide any additional citations, datasets, or notes relevant to the assumptions you reported above.

Q24
Dropdown

Which region are you primarily based in?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • North America
  • South America
  • Oceania
  • Middle East
  • Multiple / Other
Q25
Long Text

What is the unit for the effect size? (e.g., mmHg, points; enter 'standardized' if unitless.)

Q26
Long Text

What are the source(s) for your variance or event-rate assumptions? (e.g., pilot data, literature, registry — please include citations or links where possible.)

Q27
Long Text

What is your target statistical power? (e.g., 0.80, 0.90)

Q28
Multiple Choice

How do you plan to handle missing data? (Select all that apply.)

  • Complete-case analysis
  • Multiple imputation
  • Maximum likelihood / mixed models
  • Inverse probability weighting
  • Last observation carried forward
  • Other (please specify)
Q29
Dropdown

What type of organization do you primarily work in?

  • University / Academic
  • Hospital / Health system
  • Government
  • Industry / Pharma
  • Nonprofit / NGO
  • Independent consultant
  • Other
Q30
Multiple Choice

Will the primary hypothesis test be one-sided or two-sided?

  • Two-sided
  • One-sided
Q31
Long Text

What country are you primarily based in? (Optional)

Q32
Multiple Choice

Is the design clustered or cluster-randomized?

  • No
  • Yes
Q33
Long Text

If your design is clustered, what is the assumed intra-class correlation (ICC)? (Enter a value between 0 and 1.)

Q34
Long Text

If your design is clustered, what is the expected average cluster size?

Q35
Multiple Choice

Does the study involve repeated measures or longitudinal outcomes?

  • No
  • Yes
Q36
Long Text

If your study has repeated measures, what is the assumed within-subject correlation (rho)? (Enter a value between 0 and 1.)

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Why this template

What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.

What sets it apart

  • Systematically captures every parameter a statistician needs for a power/sample size calculation — effect size, MDE, variance/event-rate assumptions, design (arms, allocation ratio, clustering, repeated measures), alpha/power, and attrition — in one structured instrument
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that can probe inconsistencies or ask for clarification on the assumptions provided, something a static form cannot do
  • Collects methodological provenance (source of variance/event-rate assumptions, citations, confidence rating) so downstream analysts can audit the inputs rather than just receiving raw numbers
  • Closes with an open-text prompt for additional context/assumptions plus respondent background (role, experience, region, organization type), giving the analyst calibration context on who supplied the estimates

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Education & Academic

Post-Study Informed Consent Comprehension Assessment

Assesses whether research participants understood key elements of informed consent—study purpose, risks, data handling, and participant rights. Designed for post-study administration to support IRB compliance and iterative improvement of consent materials.

View template
Education & Academic

Course Communication & Support Effectiveness Survey

Measures student perceptions of messaging timeliness, channel preference, and support quality in online or fintech cohort programs to identify actionable communication improvements.

View template
Education & Academic

Mixed-Methods Integration Quality Assessment

A team-level diagnostic for mixed-methods research projects, evaluating convergence, divergence, and integration rigor across qualitative and quantitative strands to guide analytic next steps.

View template
Education & Academic

Stimulus Comprehension & Manipulation Check Assessment

A research-grade instrument for verifying that experimental participants correctly perceived, understood, and interpreted a presented stimulus. Designed for researchers conducting experiments who need to validate manipulation fidelity and comprehension before analyzing dependent variables.

View template
Education & Academic

Research Participant Eligibility & Informed Consent Screener

Screens prospective research participants for eligibility and verifies comprehension of informed consent elements before enrollment in an academic study.

View template
Education & Academic

Financial Aid Application Experience Survey

Measures student perceptions of financial aid application clarity, fairness, and support quality. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback from applicants and non-applicants within the past 12 months.

View template