Pack Size Price Threshold Survey
Measures consumer price thresholds across single and multipack sizes using price sensitivity methodology. Identifies acceptable price ranges, purchase frequency, and pack-size preferences to inform pricing strategy.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which product category would you like to evaluate pricing for?
- Beverages (soda, juice, water)
- Snacks & confectionery
- Personal care (shampoo, soap, toothpaste)
- Household cleaning products
- Canned & packaged foods
- Pet food & supplies
- Baby care products
- Paper products (tissues, paper towels)
- Batteries & small electronics accessories
- Other
The next few questions ask about prices you would expect for different pack sizes in your chosen category. Please enter prices in your local currency using numbers only (e.g., 5.99).
Now thinking about a small multipack (3–5 units):
Finally, thinking about a large multipack (9–12 units):
When shopping for this product, how much does price influence your purchase decision?
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about how you evaluate prices or choose between pack sizes.
What is your age?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses will help us better understand price expectations across different pack sizes. Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
In the past 3 months, have you purchased a product in this category?
- Yes
- No
For a single unit, below what price would you question the product's quality?
For a small multipack (3–5 units), below what price would you question the product's quality?
For a large multipack (9–12 units), below what price would you question the product's quality?
How many times did you purchase this product in the past 3 months?
- 0 times
- 1 time
- 2–3 times
- 4–6 times
- 7 or more times
We'd like to understand more about how you think about pricing and value when choosing between different pack sizes. Please share your thoughts, and we may ask a couple of follow-up questions.
Which gender do you identify with?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
Which of the following pack sizes have you purchased in the past 3 months? Select all that apply.
- Single unit
- Small multipack (3–5 units)
- Large multipack (9–12 units)
- None of the above
For a single unit, at what price would the product start to seem expensive, but you would still consider buying it?
For a small multipack (3–5 units), at what price would the product start to seem expensive, but you would still consider buying it?
For a large multipack (9–12 units), at what price would the product start to seem expensive, but you would still consider buying it?
When choosing between a single unit and a multipack, which factors matter most to you? Select up to 3.
- Lower per-unit price
- Total amount I spend at checkout
- Storage space at home
- How quickly I use the product
- Trying a product before committing to more
- Convenience of carrying the package
- Promotional offers or discounts
- Other
Where do you currently live?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East & Africa
- Prefer not to say
For a single unit, at what price would the product be a great deal — a real bargain?
For a small multipack (3–5 units), at what price would the product be a great deal — a real bargain?
For a large multipack (9–12 units), at what price would the product be a great deal — a real bargain?
How likely are you to switch to a larger pack size if the per-unit price is lower?
What is your approximate annual household income?
- Under $25,000
- $25,000–$49,999
- $50,000–$74,999
- $75,000–$99,999
- $100,000–$149,999
- $150,000 or more
- Prefer not to say
For a single unit, above what price would you consider the product too expensive to purchase, regardless of its quality?
For a small multipack (3–5 units), above what price would you consider the product too expensive to purchase, regardless of its quality?
For a large multipack (9–12 units), above what price would you consider the product too expensive to purchase, regardless of its quality?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Applies the full Van Westendorp-style question set (too cheap, expensive-but-acceptable, expensive, too expensive) separately for single units, small multipacks (3–5), and large multipacks (9–12), letting you compare thresholds across pack sizes rather than a single price point.
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes how respondents actually reason about pack-size value and trade-offs, going beyond fixed-choice pricing questions.
- Pairs price threshold data with purchase frequency, pack-size preference drivers, price sensitivity (opinion scale), and willingness-to-switch-to-larger-pack questions, plus a closing open-text reflection and standard demographics for segmentation.
- Runs on QuestionPunk's transparent-prompt AI interview engine with automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report, on a free tier or $50/mo Business plan (no academic tier).
Jotform
Price Sensitivity Survey Form TemplateA static, fieldable form built around core Van Westendorp price-sensitivity questions. It's a straightforward, easy-to-deploy template but doesn't appear to segment pricing by pack size or product configuration the way a multipack-focused study would. Customization relies on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder rather than adaptive questioning.
What it does well
- Ready-to-use, quick-to-deploy form template
- Built on the recognized Van Westendorp price sensitivity framework
- Benefits from Jotform's broad form-building and integration ecosystem
Where it falls short
- Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on respondent reasoning
- No indication of pack-size-specific price threshold segmentation (single vs. multipack)
- No published methodology for automated response quality scoring
SurveySparrow
Price Sensitivity Questionnaire TemplateA conversational-style survey template focused on the standard price sensitivity meter questions. It offers a more chat-like respondent experience than a plain form, but appears to be a fixed question set rather than one tailored to comparing pack sizes or generating adaptive follow-ups.
What it does well
- Conversational, chat-style survey format that can improve completion rates
- Pre-built around established price sensitivity questioning logic
- Part of a broader marketing template library for quick setup
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview to explore why respondents chose their price points
- No visible support for comparing thresholds across multiple pack/unit sizes
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of open responses
Typeform
Price Sensitivity Survey TemplateA polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time template covering the classic price sensitivity questions. It's a strong template for basic single-item price testing but shows no evidence of pack-size segmentation, voice interviews, or AI-driven probing.
What it does well
- Clean, engaging one-question-at-a-time interface known for high completion rates
- Built on the standard price sensitivity meter question set
- Easy to customize visually within Typeform's design tools
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to probe respondent reasoning further
- No apparent structure for comparing single-unit vs. small/large multipack price thresholds
- No automated response quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Menu Concept Appeal & Pricing Test
A concept-testing instrument for restaurants evaluating new menu items. Measures appeal, perceived uniqueness, willingness to pay, and purchase intent across up to three concepts, with qualitative probing for optimization insights.
View templateConsumer Purchase Behavior Segmentation Screener
Screens and segments consumer respondents by recent purchase behavior, shopping priorities, and decision-making roles to qualify and profile audiences for targeted market research studies.
View templateStartup Assumption Certainty Assessment
A diagnostic survey for startup founders to systematically evaluate evidence-backed certainty across customer, problem, channel, and revenue assumptions, enabling prioritized validation planning.
View templateKano Model Feature Prioritization Survey
Classifies product features into Must-Be, Attractive, One-Dimensional, and Indifferent categories using the Kano model methodology. Designed for product teams seeking to prioritize their roadmap based on how features drive customer satisfaction.
View templateEarly Adopter Identification & Trial Tolerance Assessment
Identifies early adopter segments by measuring problem severity, experimentation behavior, bug tolerance, and adoption influence. Use with prospective beta testers or tool evaluation panels to prioritize product roadmap and recruit champions.
View templateCategory Entry Points & Brand Choice Survey
Measures when and why shoppers enter a product category, the decision drivers behind brand selection, and the path to purchase—providing actionable insights for brand positioning, retail activation, and category growth strategy.
View template