All templates

Pairwise Feature Trade-Off Preference Survey

Measures consumer feature preferences through forced-choice pairwise comparisons, attribute importance rankings, and purchase intent for portable consumer electronics. Designed for market researchers seeking to identify which product attributes most influence buying decisions.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

27 questions · ~12 min
Q01
Message

Welcome and thank you for participating in this research study. This survey asks you to compare pairs of product options and tell us which you prefer. It takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. • Your participation is entirely voluntary—you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers; we are interested in your genuine opinions. • All responses are confidential, anonymized, and reported only in aggregate. • Results will be used for internal product research purposes. By continuing, you agree to participate under these conditions.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Which of the following portable gadgets have you purchased or seriously considered purchasing in the past 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Wireless headphones or earbuds
  • Portable power bank
  • Bluetooth speaker
  • Fitness tracker or smartwatch
  • Portable charger/cable kit
  • None of the above
Q03
Message

<p><strong>Trade-off 1 — Price vs. Battery Life</strong></p><p><strong>Option A:</strong> $29 — 8-hour battery life — 1-year warranty — Standard build</p><p><strong>Option B:</strong> $49 — 20-hour battery life — 1-year warranty — Standard build</p>

Q04
Ranking

Rank the following product attributes from most important to least important when choosing a portable gadget.

  1. Price
  2. Battery life
  3. Durability / build quality
  4. Brand reputation
  5. Warranty length
  6. Eco / sustainability rating
  7. Feature set
Drag to rank
Q05
Opinion Scale

To what extent do you agree or disagree: I prioritize long-term reliability over getting the lowest price.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q06
Long Text

Based on the trade-offs you evaluated, is there anything else you'd like to share about how you make product decisions?

Q07
Multiple Choice

What is your age group?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
Message

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will help us understand what matters most in everyday gadget choices. You may now close this window.

Q09
Message

In this survey, you will compare pairs of portable gadget options and select the one you would most likely buy today. If neither stands out, you may choose 'No preference.' Imagine you are shopping for an everyday portable gadget such as wireless headphones or a power bank. Each option differs on specific attributes like price, battery life, or warranty.

Q10
Multiple Choice

Trade-off 1: Which option would you choose today?

  • Option A — Lower price ($29), shorter battery (8 hrs)
  • Option B — Higher price ($49), longer battery (20 hrs)
  • No preference
Q11
Opinion Scale

How likely are you to purchase a portable gadget like this in the next 3 months?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q12
Opinion Scale

To what extent do you agree or disagree: I am willing to pay more for products with strong environmental credentials.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q13
AI Interview

We'd like to understand your decision-making process a bit more. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions about the trade-offs you evaluated.

Q14
Multiple Choice

Which gender do you identify with?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
Message

<p><strong>Trade-off 2 — Brand Reputation vs. Eco Rating</strong></p><p><strong>Option A:</strong> Well-known brand — Standard eco rating — $39 — 12-hour battery</p><p><strong>Option B:</strong> Lesser-known brand — Top eco rating — $39 — 12-hour battery</p>

Q16
Multiple Choice

If you are unlikely to purchase soon, what is the primary reason?

  • Budget constraints
  • My current product is still sufficient
  • Unsure which brand or model to trust
  • Waiting for a sale or better deal
  • Available features don't meet my needs
  • Environmental or sustainability concerns
  • Not applicable — I am likely to purchase
Q17
Opinion Scale

To what extent do you agree or disagree: Brand reputation is more important to me than product specifications.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q18
Dropdown

In which country or region do you currently reside?

  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Canada
  • Australia
  • India
  • Germany
  • France
  • Netherlands
  • Other
Q19
Multiple Choice

Trade-off 2: Which option would you choose today?

  • Option A — Well-known brand, standard eco rating
  • Option B — Lesser-known brand, top eco rating
  • No preference
Q20
Dropdown

What is the most you would be willing to pay for the portable gadget option you most preferred?

  • Less than $20
  • $20–$29
  • $30–$39
  • $40–$49
  • $50–$69
  • $70–$99
  • $100 or more
Q21
Multiple Choice

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Some high school or less
  • High school diploma or equivalent
  • Some college / Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
Message

<p><strong>Trade-off 3 — Durability vs. Feature Set</strong></p><p><strong>Option A:</strong> Rugged, water-resistant build — Basic feature set — $39 — 12-hour battery</p><p><strong>Option B:</strong> Standard build — Advanced features (noise cancelling, app integration) — $39 — 12-hour battery</p>

Q23
Multiple Choice

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker / Caregiver
  • Retired
  • Not currently employed
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
Multiple Choice

Trade-off 3: Which option would you choose today?

  • Option A — Rugged build, basic features
  • Option B — Standard build, advanced features
  • No preference
Q25
Message

<p><strong>Trade-off 4 — Warranty Length vs. Price</strong></p><p><strong>Option A:</strong> 2-year warranty — $45 — 12-hour battery — Standard build</p><p><strong>Option B:</strong> 6-month warranty — $30 — 12-hour battery — Standard build</p>

Q26
Multiple Choice

Trade-off 4: Which option would you choose today?

  • Option A — 2-year warranty, higher price ($45)
  • Option B — 6-month warranty, lower price ($30)
  • No preference
Q27
Multiple Choice

If any of the trade-off choices above felt difficult, what was the main reason?

  • Both options seemed similar in value
  • The attributes weren't important to me
  • I needed more information to decide
  • Price differences overshadowed other factors
  • I didn't find it difficult to choose

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes four explicit pairwise trade-off scenarios (price vs. battery life, brand vs. eco rating, durability vs. feature set, warranty vs. price) rather than generic feature-rating questions
  • Pairs forced-choice trade-offs with a ranking task for attribute importance and a purchase-intent opinion scale plus willingness-to-pay dropdown, giving both relative and absolute preference data
  • Adds an AI-moderated follow-up interview segment that probes respondents on their decision-making process behind the trade-offs they just made — something static form tools cannot do
  • Runs on QuestionPunk, so responses get automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report, with transparent, inspectable AI prompts

Jotform

Consumer Preference Survey Form Template

A general-purpose consumer preference form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop builder, aimed at capturing broad likes/dislikes rather than structured pairwise trade-offs. It's a customizable starting template, not a purpose-built forced-choice or conjoint-style instrument. Good for quick deployment but lacks the trade-off methodology market researchers need for attribute-weight analysis.

What it does well

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization
  • Broad template library for adaptation
  • Simple to deploy quickly for basic feedback collection

Where it falls short

  • No structured pairwise/forced-choice trade-off logic evident
  • Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up questioning
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency since it isn't an AI-driven tool

SurveyMonkey

Product Feature Survey Template

A ready-to-field template focused on gathering feedback on individual product features, likely using rating and multiple-choice questions. It's built for general feature feedback rather than head-to-head trade-off comparisons or attribute-importance ranking. Solid for straightforward feature satisfaction surveys but not designed around forced trade-offs.

What it does well

  • Fielding-ready template on an established survey platform
  • Likely benefits from SurveyMonkey's benchmarking and analytics tools
  • Familiar, easy-to-answer format for respondents

Where it falls short

  • No apparent pairwise/forced-choice trade-off structure for isolating attribute influence
  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI probing on respondent reasoning
  • No AI-generated report or transparent prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Purchase Intent Survey Template

A conversational-style template focused specifically on purchase intent, which overlaps with one section of our survey but doesn't cover pairwise feature trade-offs or attribute-importance ranking. It's a fielding-ready template well-suited to intent measurement alone rather than a full trade-off/preference study.

What it does well

  • Chat-like conversational UI that may improve completion rates
  • Focused specifically on purchase intent metrics
  • Ready-to-use template requiring minimal setup

Where it falls short

  • Narrower scope focused on intent, not trade-off or attribute-ranking analysis
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore reasoning behind answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.