Do you currently hold a teaching role (full-time, part-time, or adjunct) at a college or university?
- Yes
- No
This survey assesses instructor preparedness to integrate artificial intelligence into teaching, covering technology proficiency, AI literacy, pedagogical confidence, institutional support, professional development needs, and workload concerns. Estimated completion time: 10 minutes.
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
This is a general-purpose PD needs assessment template, not one focused specifically on AI readiness or instructor technology proficiency. It's a fielding-ready static form that could be adapted but would need significant editing to cover AI literacy, workload concerns, or institutional AI support. Good for basic PD topic/format preference gathering, but shallower than a purpose-built AI readiness instrument.
A broader professional development survey template rather than one designed around AI integration readiness specifically. It's a fixed, fielding-ready question set suitable for general training feedback, but would require heavy customization to capture AI literacy, pedagogical confidence with AI, or workload/time-cost concerns. Useful as a generic PD benchmarking tool rather than an AI-readiness diagnostic.
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
More studies from the same category.
A research survey examining how AI tools are reshaping academic integrity norms among college and university students. Covers policy awareness, personal usage patterns, acceptability perceptions, peer behavior observations, and policy recommendations.
View templateAn academic research survey exploring faculty attitudes, concerns, and readiness regarding AI-assisted grading and assessment tools. Covers current practices, openness to adoption, concerns about bias/accuracy/privacy, training needs, and willingness to participate in controlled experiments.
View templateAn academic instrument measuring student awareness of, exposure to, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence ethics. Covers concept familiarity, training exposure, ethical dilemma responses, regulation views, and willingness to prioritize ethics over convenience. Estimated completion: 8–12 minutes.
View templateMeasures how effectively employees apply recent training to their jobs, identifying barriers, enablers, and perceived outcomes to improve learning transfer and training ROI.
View templateAssesses how well current curriculum, resources, and support structures meet learner needs, identifying gaps and priorities to guide program improvements. Designed for enrolled students or active learners in formal or informal educational settings.
View templateA structured pilot review instrument for expert panelists or cognitive interview participants to evaluate draft survey items on clarity, redundancy, response-option quality, and face validity before fielding.
View template