All templates
Nonprofit & Civic

Urban Congestion Pricing: Driver Attitudes & Willingness-to-Pay Survey

Measures driver support, perceived fairness, willingness to pay, and revenue allocation preferences for congestion pricing. Designed for city agencies and transportation policy researchers studying public acceptance before or after zone implementation.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

29 questions · ~12 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to this survey on urban transportation and traffic management. This survey is being conducted to understand how drivers and residents feel about different approaches to managing traffic congestion. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. The results will be used to inform transportation policy discussions. The survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete. By proceeding, you indicate your consent to participate.

Q02
Multiple Choice

How often do you drive in or through your city's central area?

  • Daily
  • Several times a week
  • Weekly
  • A few times per month
  • Rarely (less than monthly)
  • I do not currently drive
Q03
Multiple Choice

How familiar are you with the concept of congestion pricing?

  • Very familiar
  • Somewhat familiar
  • I've heard of it but don't know details
  • Not at all familiar
Q04
Multiple Choice

In the past 30 days, did you drive into the area that would be (or is) covered by the congestion pricing zone?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q05
Opinion Scale

Overall, to what extent do you support or oppose implementing a congestion charge in your city?

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly opposeMax:Strongly support
Q06
Dropdown

What is the highest daily charge you would consider acceptable to enter the zone during peak hours?

  • No charge is acceptable ($0)
  • $1–$3
  • $4–$6
  • $7–$9
  • $10–$14
  • $15–$19
  • $20 or more
Q07
AI Interview

We'd like to understand your views a bit more. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions about your thoughts on congestion pricing.

Q08
Dropdown

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
Message

Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses have been recorded and will be used in aggregate to inform congestion pricing policy discussions. Your individual answers will remain confidential. If you have questions about this research, please contact the study team.

Q10
Multiple Choice

Which best describes the area where you do most of your driving?

  • City center / urban core
  • Inner suburbs
  • Outer suburbs / exurban
  • Small town / rural
  • Mix of areas
Q11
Message

<p>Before we ask your opinions, here is a brief description:</p><p><strong>Congestion pricing</strong> is a policy where drivers pay a fee to enter a designated zone in a city's central area during certain hours. The goals are to reduce traffic congestion, improve air quality, and generate revenue that can be reinvested in transportation. Fees may vary by time of day, and exemptions or discounts may be offered for certain groups.</p><p>Examples of cities with congestion pricing include London, Stockholm, and Singapore. Some cities are currently exploring or implementing similar programs.</p><p>Please keep this description in mind as you answer the following questions.</p>

Q12
Dropdown

Approximately how many times did you drive into the congestion zone in the past 30 days?

  • 1–2 times
  • 3–5 times
  • 6–10 times
  • 11–20 times
  • More than 20 times
Q13
Opinion Scale

How likely would you be to change your driving behavior (e.g., drive less, shift times) in response to a congestion charge?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unlikelyMax:Very likely
Q14
Ranking

Please rank the following uses of congestion pricing revenue from most to least important to you.

  1. Improve public transit service
  2. Reduce public transit fares
  3. Road and bridge maintenance
  4. Pedestrian and cycling infrastructure
  5. Traffic safety programs
  6. Neighborhood air and noise mitigation near the zone
  7. General city budget
Drag to rank
Q15
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you think city leaders should consider about congestion pricing?

Q16
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
Multiple Choice

What are your usual reasons for traveling into the central area? Select all that apply.

  • Work / commute
  • Errands / shopping
  • Appointments (e.g., medical, government)
  • Leisure / entertainment
  • Transporting others (e.g., family, carpool)
  • Business / deliveries
  • Pass-through (not stopping in the area)
  • Other
Q18
Multiple Choice

When do you most often drive into the zone?

  • Morning (6–10 am)
  • Midday (10 am–3 pm)
  • Afternoon/evening (3–7 pm)
  • Night (7 pm–6 am)
Q19
Opinion Scale

How fair or unfair do you think congestion pricing would be overall?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unfairMax:Very fair
Q20
Ranking

Rank the following policy design features from most to least important to you.

  1. Low-income discounts
  2. Off-peak discounts
  3. Daily price cap
  4. Resident discounts
  5. Transparent public reporting of how revenue is spent
Drag to rank
Q21
Multiple Choice

Do you currently hold a valid driver's license?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
Multiple Choice

When you chose not to drive into the zone, what did you do instead? Select all that apply.

  • Took an alternate route around the zone
  • Traveled at a different time
  • Used public transit
  • Delayed the trip to another day
  • Did not make the trip at all
  • Used ride-hail or taxi
  • Walked or cycled
  • Other
Q23
Opinion Scale

How fair or unfair do you think congestion pricing would be for low-income drivers?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unfairMax:Very fair
Q24
Multiple Choice

Do you have regular access to a car or light truck?

  • Yes, always
  • Sometimes
  • No
Q25
Opinion Scale

How fair or unfair do you think congestion pricing would be for small business owners who rely on vehicle deliveries?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unfairMax:Very fair
Q26
Dropdown

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college / associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q27
Opinion Scale

How fair or unfair do you think congestion pricing would be for people who commute into the city for work?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unfairMax:Very fair
Q28
Dropdown

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker / caregiver
  • Retired
  • Unemployed and seeking work
  • Not seeking paid work
  • Prefer not to say
Q29
Dropdown

What is your total annual household income before taxes?

  • Under 25,000
  • 25,000–49,999
  • 50,000–74,999
  • 75,000–99,999
  • 100,000–149,999
  • 150,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes a dedicated fairness battery breaking down perceived equity for low-income drivers, small business owners, and commuters specifically — not just overall support/opposition
  • Captures actual recent driving behavior (frequency, timing, trip purpose, and alternatives chosen) alongside attitudinal measures, giving city agencies behavioral context for stated preferences
  • Uses ranking questions to force trade-offs on revenue allocation priorities and policy design features, rather than relying on flat multiple-choice preference questions
  • Closes with an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended reasoning behind support/opposition, plus an open-text question for policy recommendations — generating richer qualitative input than a static form

QuestionPro

Concept Evaluation and Pricing Study Survey Templates

This is a generic concept/pricing evaluation template rather than one built for congestion pricing or transportation policy specifically. It could be adapted with manual edits for willingness-to-pay questions, but lacks the driving-behavior, fairness, and revenue-allocation framing built into a congestion pricing study. Best suited as a general-purpose pricing research starting point, not a fielding-ready policy acceptance survey.

What it does well

  • Established survey platform with broad question-type library for pricing/concept research
  • Template presumably covers standard price-sensitivity question formats (e.g., willingness-to-pay ranges)

Where it falls short

  • No congestion-pricing-specific content (zone definitions, driving behavior, revenue allocation) evident from the page
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up interviewing to probe reasoning behind pricing attitudes
  • No transparent, publishable prompt/methodology documentation for qualitative components

SurveySparrow

Product Pricing Survey Template

This template targets product pricing and price sensitivity research for commercial goods/services, not transportation policy or driver attitudes. It may offer reusable willingness-to-pay question logic, but has no built-in content on driving behavior, congestion zones, or fairness perceptions for policy contexts. Would require substantial rebuilding to serve as a congestion pricing acceptance study.

What it does well

  • Purpose-built for price sensitivity/willingness-to-pay research in a consumer product context
  • Likely offers conversational, mobile-friendly survey formatting typical of SurveySparrow's editor

Where it falls short

  • No transportation, congestion zone, or policy-specific question content evident
  • Fixed-form format without adaptive AI-driven follow-up probing on respondent reasoning
  • No per-response quality scoring or automated report generation described for this template

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Nonprofit & Civic

Community Service Gaps & Priorities Assessment

A structured needs assessment for local governments and nonprofits to identify residents' service priorities, access barriers, and communication preferences to guide resource allocation.

View template
Nonprofit & Civic

Community Microgrid Attitudes & Governance Preferences Survey

Measures resident support for community microgrids, preferred ownership models, participation willingness, and priority tradeoffs. Designed for municipal planners and civic organizations assessing community readiness for local energy infrastructure.

View template
Nonprofit & Civic

Resident 311 Service Quality & Responsiveness Survey

Measures resident satisfaction with municipal 311 non-emergency services across submission channels, response timeliness, resolution outcomes, and institutional trust to guide service improvement priorities.

View template
Nonprofit & Civic

Nonprofit Volunteer Satisfaction & Retention Survey

Measures how satisfied volunteers are with their role, training, recognition, and coordination — and what would keep them coming back. Includes a best-worst trade-off to prioritize fixes and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the real reason behind a volunteer's satisfaction or hesitation to continue. Built for volunteer coordinators and nonprofit program managers.

View template
Nonprofit & Civic

Volunteer Experience & Program Evaluation Survey

Assesses how volunteers experience training, communication, recognition, and support, and how likely they are to keep volunteering or recommend the program. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific experience behind their satisfaction score so program staff know exactly what to fix or protect.

View template
Nonprofit & Civic

Volunteer Enrollment Experience & Onboarding Survey

Measures how easily new volunteers move from initial interest to their first shift — sign-up friction, communication clarity, and motivation — for nonprofit volunteer coordinators. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific moment where enrollment stalled or shined, surfacing fixes that closed-ended ratings alone would miss.

View template