Fundraising Message & CTA Effectiveness Survey
Tests donor-facing messages and calls to action to identify which language most motivates giving. Designed for nonprofit marketing teams seeking data-driven guidance on fundraising communications.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the past 12 months, have you personally donated money to any nonprofit organization?
- Yes
- No
<p>You will now see three short fundraising messages. Please read each one carefully before answering the questions that follow.</p><p><strong>Message A:</strong> "Your $25 provides 50 meals to a neighbor in need — donate today and feed your community."</p><p><strong>Message B:</strong> "Every dollar you give is matched 2:1 to fund after-school tutoring — double your impact for local students."</p><p><strong>Message C:</strong> "Become a monthly donor for just $10/month and provide steady, reliable support that changes lives year-round."</p>
<p>Now you will see three different call-to-action buttons that might appear on a fundraising email or webpage. Please read each one carefully.</p><p><strong>CTA 1:</strong> "Donate Now"</p><p><strong>CTA 2:</strong> "Give $25 Today"</p><p><strong>CTA 3:</strong> "Join Our Monthly Giving Circle"</p>
After seeing the messages and calls to action, how likely are you to donate to a cause like this in the next 30 days?
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for participating! Your feedback will directly help improve nonprofit fundraising communications. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.
Which of the following causes have you supported or would you be most interested in supporting? (Select all that apply)
- Hunger & food security
- Education & youth development
- Health & medical research
- Environment & conservation
- Poverty & homelessness
- Arts & culture
- Animal welfare
- Other
- None of the above
How motivating is Message A ("Your $25 provides 50 meals to a neighbor in need") in encouraging you to donate?
How likely would you be to click CTA 1 ("Donate Now") if you saw it in a fundraising email or webpage?
How confident are you that you would follow through on a donation if you decided to give?
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
How motivating is Message B ("Every dollar you give is matched 2:1 for after-school tutoring") in encouraging you to donate?
How likely would you be to click CTA 2 ("Give $25 Today") if you saw it in a fundraising email or webpage?
Thinking about what might influence your decision to donate, what factors would hold you back or motivate you to give?
Which region do you currently live in?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America and Caribbean
- Middle East and North Africa
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Prefer not to say
How motivating is Message C ("Become a monthly donor for just $10/month") in encouraging you to donate?
How likely would you be to click CTA 3 ("Join Our Monthly Giving Circle") if you saw it in a fundraising email or webpage?
Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about the messages or calls to action you reviewed.
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or vocational training
- Bachelor's degree
- Postgraduate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
Please rank the three messages from most to least compelling.
- Message A: Meals for a neighbor
- Message B: Matched gift for tutoring
- Message C: Become a monthly donor
Which of the three call-to-action phrases would be most likely to prompt you to take action?
- Donate Now
- Give $25 Today
- Join Our Monthly Giving Circle
What is your current employment status?
- Employed full time
- Employed part time
- Self-employed
- Unemployed and looking for work
- Student
- Homemaker or caregiver
- Retired
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Briefly, why did your top-ranked message resonate with you?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Directly A/B/C tests three real fundraising message variants (impact-framed, matched-gift, monthly-giving) using opinion-scale ratings plus a forced ranking and open-text 'why it resonated' follow-up, rather than just general feedback.
- Compares three specific CTA phrasings ("Donate Now," "Give $25 Today," "Join Our Monthly Giving Circle") on click-likelihood and preference, giving nonprofit marketers actionable copy guidance.
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes what factors would actually influence a respondent's donation decision, surfacing reasoning static scales can't capture.
- Pairs donation history, cause affinity, and demographic segmentation with overall donation-likelihood and follow-through-confidence measures, so results can be sliced by donor type.
QuestionPro
Loyalty Acid Test - Fundraising Version Survey TemplateThis is a fundraising adaptation of QuestionPro's general 'loyalty acid test' instrument, focused on donor loyalty and satisfaction rather than testing specific message or CTA wording. It's a ready-to-field static template with QuestionPro's standard survey logic and reporting behind it.
What it does well
- Based on an established, reusable loyalty-measurement framework
- Backed by QuestionPro's mature survey logic, branching, and dashboard reporting
- Quick to deploy for general donor-sentiment tracking
Where it falls short
- Not designed to compare specific message or CTA variants side by side like ours does
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing
- No published methodology for how loyalty scores are calculated or scored
SurveyMonkey
Fundraising Feedback Survey TemplateA general post-fundraising feedback template aimed at gathering donor satisfaction and event/campaign impressions, not at testing which specific message or CTA language drives more giving. It's a straightforward, fielding-ready static form built on SurveyMonkey's well-known survey builder.
What it does well
- Easy, familiar survey builder and fast distribution
- Established brand with broad respondent-panel and analytics options
- Simple to customize for general feedback collection
Where it falls short
- No built-in message/CTA comparison structure — this is feedback collection, not experimental copy testing
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI follow-up to explore donor reasoning
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt documentation
SurveySparrow
Fundraising Feedback Form TemplateA conversational-style feedback form for capturing general donor impressions after a fundraising effort, rather than a controlled test of competing messages or CTAs. It leans on SurveySparrow's chat-like UI but remains a static question set once published.
What it does well
- Conversational, chat-style form UI that may feel more engaging than plain forms
- Simple to launch for general post-campaign feedback
- Mobile-friendly presentation
Where it falls short
- Not structured to rank or compare specific message/CTA variants as ours does
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — the conversational feel is templated, not dynamically generated
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of open responses
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Nonprofit Donor Satisfaction & Stewardship Survey
Measures donor perceptions of nonprofit communications clarity, online giving usability, and post-gift stewardship to identify key drivers of satisfaction and retention.
View templateCity Noise Complaint Process: Resident Experience Survey
Measures resident satisfaction, process clarity, response timeliness, and institutional trust in city noise complaint handling. Designed for 311 and civic service teams seeking actionable feedback to reduce bottlenecks and improve complaint resolution.
View templateResident Micromobility Safety & Parking Perceptions Survey
A civic research instrument for municipalities to assess resident perceptions and experiences with e-scooter and e-bike safety, parking compliance, and enforcement preferences. Suitable for both micromobility users and non-users.
View templateLibrary Patron Experience: Discovery, Holds & Digital Services
Measures patron satisfaction and friction points across material discovery, hold management, and digital resource usage to prioritize service improvements for public libraries.
View templateE-Government Services Usability & Accessibility Survey
Measures citizen satisfaction with online government services across usability, accessibility, transparency, and support preferences. Designed for public-sector agencies seeking actionable feedback to improve digital service delivery.
View templateResident 311 Service Quality & Responsiveness Survey
Measures resident satisfaction with municipal 311 non-emergency services across submission channels, response timeliness, resolution outcomes, and institutional trust to guide service improvement priorities.
View template