Research

Participant Screener & Demographics

A clean recruiting screener: knock-out questions first, quota-ready demographics, an attention check, and an articulation check that verifies participants can give the rich answers qualitative research needs. Designed to disqualify politely and comply with prefer-not-to-say norms.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 4분

Q01

메시지

Thanks for your interest in our research! These few questions check whether this particular study is a match for you. It takes about 4 minutes, and if it's not a fit this time, that's about our study needs — not about you.

Q02

객관식필수

Do you, or does anyone in your household, work in any of these industries?

Market research
Advertising or public relations
Journalism or media
The industry this study is about (replace with yours)

Q03

객관식필수

Which best describes your role in decisions about the product category we're studying?

I decide on my own
I share the decision with others
I influence but don't decide
I'm not involved

Q04

객관식필수

How often do you use products in this category?

Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Less often
Never

Q05

객관식필수

To confirm you're reading carefully, please select 'Weekly' for this question.

Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Never

Q06

장문형필수

In 2–3 sentences, describe the last time you used a product in this category — what you were doing and how it went. (This helps us confirm the study fits your experience.)

Q07

드롭다운필수

Which age group are you in?

Under 18
18–24
25–34
35–44
45–54
55–64
65+
Prefer not to say

Q08

드롭다운필수

How do you describe your gender?

Woman
Man
Non-binary
I describe it another way
Prefer not to say

Q09

드롭다운

What is your approximate annual household income?

Under $25,000
$25,000–$49,999
$50,000–$99,999
$100,000–$149,999
$150,000 or more
Prefer not to say

Q10

드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

High school or less
Some college
Bachelor's degree
Graduate degree
Prefer not to say

Q11

드롭다운

Which best describes your current employment?

Employed full-time
Employed part-time
Self-employed
Student
Not currently employed
Retired
Prefer not to say

Q12

이메일필수

If you qualify, where should we send your invitation?

Q13

메시지

Thanks — that's everything! We'll be in touch if the study is a match. Your contact details are used only for this research and never sold or shared.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Knock-out questions first, an attention check, and an articulation check that verifies participants can give the rich answers qualitative research needs
Inclusive demographics with prefer-not-to-say on every sensitive item, aligned to standard reporting brackets
Industry/insider disqualification handled politely — unqualified participants exit with dignity
Quota-ready structure: every screener answer is filterable for balancing your panel

SurveyMonkey

U.S. Demographics Survey Template

Used 7,000+ times; aligns demographic categories (gender identity, age, education, employment, household income, race/ethnicity) to federal ACS and updated OMB standards with inclusive, self-describe options. Excellent as a standards-aligned demographic block, but framed as demographics collection rather than a screening flow with qualify/disqualify branching and quotas.

잘하는 점

Category wording aligned to ACS and 2024 OMB standards, including combined multi-select race/ethnicity with MENA
Inclusive, current gender-identity language with self-describe options
Standardized income brackets and consistent age/education ranges that benchmark to national data
Backed by SurveyMonkey's skip-logic and reporting for segmentation

아쉬운 점

Presented as a demographic questionnaire, not a screener: no built-in qualify/disqualify termination logic or quota management on the template itself
No attention/red-herring screener items to catch professional survey-takers or fraud
No adaptive follow-up to confirm a borderline qualification (e.g., probe frequency/recency of a behavior)
No transparent screening rationale shown to sponsor; termination is manual skip-logic the user must wire up

QuestionPro

Demographic Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

Expert-designed demographic template spanning gender, age, marital/family, employment, income, education, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, housing, and political views, positioned for market, academic, healthcare, and non-profit research. Very broad question bank, but it is a demographic library rather than a screening instrument with disqualification and quota controls.

잘하는 점

Unusually broad demographic coverage including psychographic-adjacent items (political views, lifestyle, religion)
Expert-designed wording positioned for reuse across market, academic, healthcare, and non-profit research
Free and directly cloneable into the QuestionPro builder
Flexible enough to assemble a tailored respondent profile

아쉬운 점

No screener-specific qualify/disqualify branching or quota enforcement built into the template
No attention checks or fraud/duplicate-respondent detection surfaced
Long, static battery risks over-asking; no adaptive skipping to only ask what a screen needs
No AI follow-up to disambiguate borderline eligibility responses

Jotform

Focus Group Screener

A real participant screener form for focus-group recruitment on Jotform's drag-and-drop builder. Handles the intake mechanics well; qualification logic, quota tracking, and data-quality checks are up to the researcher to add.

잘하는 점

Purpose-built screener form, free to use and easy to customize
Jotform's conditional logic can disqualify as respondents answer
Wide integration ecosystem for routing qualified participants

아쉬운 점

No built-in attention or articulation checks to protect qualitative data quality
No AI follow-up to verify claimed experience is genuine
Quota balancing and panel management are manual

자주 묻는 질문