QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
Start free
All templates

Program and Session Participant Feedback Survey

Captures how participants experienced a workshop, training, or program — satisfaction, perceived value of specific sessions, and likelihood to return — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind their ratings so organizers know exactly what to keep, fix, or cut next time.

Use this templateBrowse more templates

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

12 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking part! We'd love your honest feedback on the program so we can make the next one better. This will take about 5 minutes.

Q02
Opinion ScaleRequired

Overall, how satisfied were you with the program?

Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired

How likely are you to recommend this program to a colleague or friend?

Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q04
MatrixRequired

Please rate each aspect of the program.

5 rows × 5 columns
  • Relevance of content to your goals
  • Facilitator/presenter effectiveness
  • Pacing and length
  • Quality of materials or resources provided
  • Organization and logistics (venue, platform, scheduling)
Columns: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Which session or module did you find most valuable? (Replace with your actual session/module list before launching.)

  • (Session A name)
  • (Session B name)
  • (Session C name)
  • (Session D name)
Q06
Ranking

If we ran this program again, rank these possible topics by how much you'd want to see them covered, from most to least wanted. (Template note: replace with topics relevant to your program.)

  1. (Topic A)
  2. (Topic B)
  3. (Topic C)
  4. (Topic D)
Drag to rank
Q07
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Did the program meet the goals you had going in?

  • Fully met my goals
  • Partially met my goals
  • Did not meet my goals
  • I didn't have a specific goal
Q08
AI Interview

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's satisfaction rating and whether the program met their goals. If they said it only partially or did not meet their goals, find out specifically what was missing or fell short and what would have closed that gap. If they rated it highly, find out which specific moment, session, or interaction made the biggest difference for them. Anchor on concrete details (a specific session, exercise, or interaction) rather than general impressions.

Q09
Long Text

Is there anything you'd suggest we change, add, or remove for future programs?

Q10
Multiple Choice

How likely are you to participate in a future program like this one?

  • Very likely
  • Somewhat likely
  • Not sure
  • Somewhat unlikely
  • Very unlikely
Q11
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your role or level of experience with this type of program? (Replace with categories relevant to your audience.)

  • First-time participant
  • Returning participant
  • Team lead or manager
  • Subject matter expert
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Message

That's everything — thank you for sharing your feedback! Your responses will be reviewed by the program team to shape improvements for the next session.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Pairs standard satisfaction and recommendation ratings with an AI follow-up interview that probes the reasoning behind each participant's satisfaction score, not just the number itself
  • Includes a matrix rating of specific program aspects plus a ranking question so organizers can see which topics participants actually want more of next time
  • Captures role/experience level and likelihood of future participation alongside open-ended suggestions, giving organizers segmented, decision-ready feedback
  • Auto-generates a report from the combined structured ratings and AI-probed open responses, so 'what to keep, fix, or cut' is synthesized rather than left in raw text

Jotform

Participant training session feedback Form Template

A static, fielding-ready form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, aimed at collecting feedback on training sessions. It's easy to customize with standard fields but relies entirely on fixed questions with no dynamic follow-up. Good for quick deployment, less suited to uncovering the 'why' behind ratings.

What it does well

  • Ready to deploy quickly with Jotform's drag-and-drop customization
  • Backed by a large, mature form template library and integrations ecosystem

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI questioning — every respondent sees the same fixed question set regardless of their answers
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Participant Feedback Form Template

A conversational-style, fielding-ready template designed for a friendlier one-question-at-a-time feel. It covers standard participant feedback fields but the flow is still pre-scripted rather than adaptively generated per response. Works well for basic satisfaction capture without deep reasoning follow-up.

What it does well

  • Conversational UI intended to feel more engaging than a plain form
  • Fielding-ready template usable out of the box for events/programs

Where it falls short

  • Conversational tone does not equate to adaptive AI follow-up — questions remain static and pre-written
  • No documented per-response quality scoring or AI-generated synthesis report

Typeform

Post-Program Feedback Form Template

A polished, fielding-ready template using Typeform's signature single-question conversational format for post-program feedback. It's strong on presentation and completion-friendly design but the question sequence is authored in advance, not generated from the respondent's own answers. No voice interview or guided task option.

What it does well

  • Clean, engaging one-question-at-a-time interface known to improve completion rates
  • Simple to brand and customize for a specific program

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI or voice interview capability to probe individual reasoning behind ratings
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

QuestionPro

Seminar feedback & attendee information survey questions + Sample questionnaire template

This page reads primarily as a guide with sample seminar feedback questions rather than a single ready-to-field survey — useful as inspiration for question wording but requiring assembly before deployment. It covers attendee information and seminar-specific satisfaction items broadly. No adaptive interview element is present.

What it does well

  • Offers a broad bank of sample questions covering seminar logistics and attendee info
  • Useful reference for question wording across multiple seminar feedback angles

Where it falls short

  • Presented as a sample question guide/blog-style resource rather than a turnkey fielding-ready template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up, voice interview, or automated quality scoring built into the questions listed

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Use this templateStart free