Client Contact & Communication Preferences Survey
Measures how satisfied clients are with the frequency, channel, and responsiveness of your team's contact, and what they actually want more or less of. Built for client-facing teams in agencies, consulting, and professional services who want to catch communication breakdowns before they cause churn. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs one specific recent contact experience instead of vague complaints.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which channel do you use most often to reach us or hear from us?
- Phone call
- Text/SMS
- Video call
- Client portal
- In person
Over the last 3 months, how satisfied have you been with how quickly we respond to your questions or requests?
How often do you want to hear from us about the status of your account or project, even when there's nothing urgent to report?
- Only when something changes
- Weekly
- Every 2 weeks
- Monthly
- Only at major milestones
How much do you agree with each statement about how we communicate with you?
- Communications are timely
- Communications are clear and easy to understand
- We proactively flag issues before you have to ask
- Communications feel personalized to your needs
- We follow up on open items without you having to chase us
Which of these aspects of our communication matter most and least to you?
- Speed of response
- Clarity of explanations
- Proactive updates on progress or issues
- Having a single, consistent point of contact
- Availability outside standard business hours
- Personalized attention to your specific needs
- Transparency about scope, pricing, or timeline changes
Based on your experience working with our team, how likely are you to recommend us to a colleague?
Ask the respondent to walk through the most recent time they reached out to us or we reached out to them: what was communicated, how quickly it happened, and whether it fully resolved their need. If their responsiveness rating was low, probe exactly where the delay or miscommunication occurred and what an ideal response would have looked like. If it was high, capture specifically what worked so it can be repeated across other clients.
Is there anything specific about how we communicate with you, frequency, channel, or content, that you'd like us to change?
How long have you been a client with us?
- Less than 6 months
- 6-12 months
- 1-3 years
- More than 3 years
- Prefer not to say
What type of account best describes your relationship with us? (Replace with your own account tiers, e.g., Individual, Small Business, Enterprise.) (Template note: customize these tiers to match your actual client segments before launching.)
- (Replace with tier A)
- (Replace with tier B)
- (Replace with tier C)
- Prefer not to say
That's everything, thank you! Your answers go directly to the team responsible for how we stay in touch with clients, and will shape changes to our communication cadence and channels.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct one specific recent contact experience instead of collecting vague 'communication could be better' complaints
- Combines a satisfaction opinion scale, a channel-preference question, a frequency preference question, and a max-diff prioritization so you learn not just how satisfied clients are but what to actually change
- Includes a matrix of agreement statements plus an open long-text follow-up to surface specifics on frequency, channel, and tone that closed questions miss
- Pairs recommendation likelihood with account type and tenure questions so churn-risk communication patterns can be segmented by client type and lifecycle stage
Jotform
70+ Client Evaluation FormsThis is a category/gallery page listing dozens of static evaluation form templates rather than a single fielding-ready client communication survey. It's useful for browsing generic form structures (ratings, checkboxes, text fields) but you'd need to assemble and customize a form yourself to match a communication-preferences use case. No mention of AI-driven follow-up or automated analysis anywhere on the page.
What it does well
- Large variety of templates to choose from and adapt
- Jotform's drag-and-drop builder makes editing any chosen template straightforward
- Familiar form fields (ratings, multiple choice, short text) that are easy for clients to complete quickly
Where it falls short
- A hub of static forms, not a purpose-built communication-preferences survey — extra setup required to get something comparable
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to dig into a specific recent contact experience
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report; results just collect as raw form submissions
QuestionPro
Client Service Satisfaction Survey TemplateThis is a genuine, ready-to-field satisfaction survey template covering the same broad territory — client experience with service and responsiveness. It's a solid generic starting point for measuring overall satisfaction, but it's not specifically built around communication channel/frequency preferences or reconstructing a single contact event. All questions appear to be standard closed-ended survey types.
What it does well
- Purpose-built as a client satisfaction survey with established question logic
- Backed by a mature survey platform with reporting and analytics tools
- Likely includes standard NPS/CSAT-style questions that are easy to benchmark
Where it falls short
- Static question set — no adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe a specific recent contact experience
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No transparent, published prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring — likely relies on manual review of open-ended answers
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.