QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
Start free
All templates

Scholarship Application Experience Survey

Captures how applicants experienced your scholarship's application process — from discovery through submission — including clarity, effort, and sticking points. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest obstacle each applicant hit, so program staff know exactly what to fix before the next cycle.

Use this templateBrowse more templates

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

13 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for applying to the (Replace with scholarship program name) scholarship! We'd love your honest feedback on the application process so we can make it easier for future applicants. This takes about 5 minutes. (Template note: replace the scholarship name before launching.)

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

How did you first hear about this scholarship?

  • School counselor or teacher
  • Search engine or online ad
  • Social media
  • Friend or family member
  • Community organization or nonprofit
  • Employer
  • Other
Q03
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Which best describes where you ended up with this application?

  • Started it but did not finish
  • Completed and submitted, still waiting to hear back
  • Submitted and was awarded
  • Submitted but was not awarded
Q04
Rating ScaleRequired

How clear were the eligibility requirements and instructions before you started?

Range: 1 – 5
Min:Very confusingMax:Very clear
Q05
Opinion ScaleRequired

Overall, how easy or difficult was it to complete this application from start to finish?

Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Extremely difficultMax:Extremely easy
Q06
MatrixRequired

Please rate each part of the application process.

5 rows × 5 columns
  • Online application portal or form
  • Essay or personal statement prompts
  • Gathering required documents (transcripts, letters, etc.)
  • Deadline reminders and communications
  • Responsiveness of scholarship staff
Columns: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q07
Multiple ChoiceRequired

What was the single biggest obstacle to completing this application?

  • Gathering required documents or letters
  • Understanding the essay prompts
  • Technical issues with the online portal
  • Finding enough time to complete it
  • Meeting the deadline
  • Cost or access issues (e.g., needing transcripts, notary)
  • Nothing was difficult
Q08
AI Interview

Reconstruct exactly what happened around the biggest obstacle the respondent selected: what specifically went wrong or felt hard, at what point in the process it occurred, and how (or whether) they resolved it. If they said 'nothing was difficult,' probe what made this application stand out as smooth compared to others they've completed. Anchor follow-ups on concrete moments, not general impressions, and ask what single change would have made the biggest difference.

Q09
Point Allocation

Thinking about your decision to apply, distribute 100 points across these factors based on how much each influenced you.

  • Financial need
  • Award amount
  • How easy the application looked
  • Reputation or prestige of the scholarship
  • Encouragement from a counselor, teacher, or family member
  • Deadline timing relative to other applications
Allocate 100 points
Q10
Ranking

Rank these support resources by how helpful they were (or would have been) while applying.

  1. FAQ or help page
  2. Email or phone support from staff
  3. Info session or webinar
  4. Sample essays or example applications
  5. Peer or mentor advice
  6. I did not use any support resources
Drag to rank
Q11
Multiple Choice

What is your current field of study or intended major?

  • STEM (science, tech, engineering, math)
  • Business or economics
  • Arts or humanities
  • Social sciences
  • Health sciences
  • Undecided
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice

Are you the first person in your immediate family to attend college?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Message

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your feedback goes directly to our scholarship team and will shape improvements to the application process for future applicants.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened around each applicant's single biggest obstacle, rather than stopping at a static multiple-choice answer.
  • Uses a matrix question to rate each distinct stage of the application process (not just one overall satisfaction score), plus a constant-sum question that forces respondents to trade off the factors behind their decision to apply.
  • Adds a ranking question on support resources and screens for first-generation college status and field of study, so program staff can see whether specific applicant segments hit different sticking points.
  • Opens and closes with plain chat messages that frame the survey as feedback on the process (not another application form), which keeps completion rates and honesty higher for a post-submission experience survey.

Jotform

100+ Scholarship Application Forms

This is a category/gallery page listing 100+ scholarship application form templates rather than a single fielding-ready survey. The templates on it are built to collect applicant data (name, essays, transcripts) for selection purposes, not to measure how applicants experienced the process.

What it does well

  • Large library of ready-made form templates to start from
  • Drag-and-drop builder with broad file-upload and e-signature support common to Jotform forms
  • Wide integration ecosystem for routing submissions

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — templates are static field-collection forms
  • No per-response quality scoring or automated analysis of applicant obstacles
  • Page is a template gallery, not a single evaluable survey instrument

SurveyMonkey

Scholarship Application Form Template

A single, ready-to-field template for collecting scholarship applications rather than post-application experience feedback. It's built around SurveyMonkey's standard survey-taking interface and reporting dashboards.

What it does well

  • Established survey platform with familiar analytics/reporting dashboards
  • Simple to launch and share for a single application form
  • Question logic and branching available for basic skip patterns

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI interview to probe into a specific reported obstacle
  • No published prompt-level methodology for how any AI features (if present) generate follow-ups
  • Fixed question set focused on intake, not on diagnosing process friction

SurveySparrow

Online Scholarship Application Form Template

A conversational-style template aimed at collecting scholarship applications, not at surveying applicants about their experience with the process afterward. It leans on SurveySparrow's chat-like form UI for a friendlier intake experience.

What it does well

  • Conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI that can feel less form-like
  • Mobile-friendly presentation
  • Part of a broader survey platform with reporting tools

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into a specific obstacle an applicant selected
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses
  • Static template structure, not designed to surface process-improvement insights for staff

Typeform

Scholarship Application Form Template

A polished, conversational scholarship application intake form, not an experience/feedback survey. It's built for collecting applicant information with Typeform's signature clean design.

What it does well

  • Clean, well-regarded conversational design that can improve completion of intake forms
  • Easy embedding on program websites
  • Logic jumps for basic conditional intake questions

Where it falls short

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview or voice interview option
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology
  • Template is intake-focused, with no built-in mechanism to surface or rank applicants' biggest process obstacles

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Use this templateStart free