All templates

Patient Waiting List Experience Survey

Captures how patients experience the wait between referral and treatment — expectations vs. reality, communication quality, anxiety, and health impact — for clinics and health systems managing waiting lists. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment communication broke down or worked well, surfacing fixes that satisfaction scores alone can't show.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

13 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience while waiting for care. Your answers help us reduce stress and confusion for future patients. This should take about 5 minutes, and there are no wrong answers.

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

What type of appointment or procedure were you waiting for?

  • Specialist consultation
  • Diagnostic test or scan
  • Surgery or procedure
  • Follow-up appointment
  • Other
Q03
NumberRequired

Roughly how many weeks passed between your referral and your appointment or procedure?

Q04
Opinion ScaleRequired

Compared to what you were originally told, how did the actual wait feel?

Scale: 15
Min:Much longer than expectedMax:Much shorter than expected
Q05
MatrixRequired

Thinking about how the clinic communicated with you during the wait, how would you rate each of the following?

4 rows × 5 columns
  • Being told how long the wait would likely be
  • Receiving updates while you waited
  • How easy it was to reach someone with questions
  • Being told what to do if your condition changed
Columns: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q06
Opinion ScaleRequired

How anxious or stressed did the waiting period make you feel?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all anxiousMax:Extremely anxious
Q07
Multiple ChoiceRequired

While you were waiting, did your condition change?

  • Got worse
  • Stayed about the same
  • Improved
  • Not sure
Q08
Multiple Choice

During the wait, did you seek care elsewhere (for example, an emergency room, urgent care, or a private provider)?

  • No, I waited it out
  • Yes, once
  • Yes, more than once
Q09
Rating ScaleRequired

Overall, how satisfied were you with your experience on the waiting list, from referral to being seen?

Range: 15
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q10
AI Interview

Explore the specific moment during the wait that most shaped the respondent's overall satisfaction rating — ask them to walk through what happened, what they expected versus what occurred, and how the clinic communicated (or didn't) at that point. If they reported worsening symptoms or seeking outside care, probe what would have prevented that and whether they felt anyone was tracking their case. If satisfaction was high, identify exactly what communication or reassurance made the difference so it can be replicated.

Q11
Multiple Choice

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18-29
  • 30-44
  • 45-59
  • 60-74
  • 75 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Message

Thank you for sharing your experience. Your responses will be combined with other patients' feedback to help our team shorten waits and improve communication for people currently on the list.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Goes beyond a satisfaction score with a matrix question rating communication quality across multiple dimensions and an opinion-scale item comparing expected vs. actual wait, so you see where the gap actually opened up
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific moment during the wait that most shaped the patient's overall experience, surfacing concrete fixes rather than just a number
  • Captures downstream impact often missed by simple wait-time forms: anxiety/stress level, whether the condition changed, and whether the patient sought care elsewhere (e.g., ER/urgent care) while waiting
  • Full patient journey covered end-to-end — referral timing, communication quality, emotional impact, outcome-related behavior, overall satisfaction, and demographics — in one fieldable, auto-reported survey

Jotform

Patient Waiting List Form Template

This is a drag-and-drop form for logging patients onto a waiting list (contact info, appointment type) rather than a survey exploring how the wait felt to them. It's fielding-ready for intake/logistics, but not built to capture expectation gaps, anxiety, or communication quality. Best suited to list management, not experience research.

What it does well

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization and clinic branding
  • Wide range of integrations (payment, calendar, CRM) common to Jotform's ecosystem
  • Simple to embed on a clinic or health system website

Where it falls short

  • Static field-based form with no adaptive follow-up questioning into why or how communication broke down
  • No built-in scoring of response quality or automated interpretive reporting
  • No voice AI interview option for patients who prefer speaking over typing

SurveySparrow

Free Patient Waiting List Form Template

SurveySparrow's version is also framed as a waiting list intake form with a conversational, chat-like UI, rather than a deep-dive experience survey. It's ready to field for collecting waitlist entries, but the template as titled doesn't appear designed to probe anxiety, communication breakdowns, or downstream care-seeking behavior. Positioned more for list intake than experience insight.

What it does well

  • Conversational, mobile-friendly form format that can feel less clinical to fill out
  • Supports multi-channel distribution (web, email, link sharing)
  • Easy branching for basic form logic

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI interviewing to dig into the specific moment a patient's experience turned positive or negative
  • No transparent, inspectable AI prompt or automated per-response quality scoring
  • Lacks structured measurement of expectation-vs-reality gaps or health impact during the wait

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.