Q01
Message
All templates
Employee Guarantor Requirement Experience Survey
Evaluates how employees experience your organization's guarantor requirement — for salary advances, employment bonds, or equipment custody — including clarity, difficulty finding a guarantor, and perceived fairness. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs what actually slowed or complicated the process, giving HR concrete input for simplifying or replacing it.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
14 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired
For which purpose did you most recently need to provide a guarantor at this company?
- Salary advance or loan
- Employment contract or bond
- Company property custody (e.g., laptop, vehicle)
- Housing or relocation assistance
- Other
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired
How clearly were the guarantor requirements explained to you before you needed to provide one?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not clear at allMax:Extremely clear
Q04
Opinion ScaleRequired
How difficult was it to find someone willing and eligible to act as your guarantor?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Very easyMax:Very difficult
Q05
Number
In the last 12 months, how many times have you been asked to provide or renew guarantor information?
Q06
Multiple Choice
Which of the following best describes the person you provided as a guarantor?
- Family member
- Friend
- Colleague at this company
- Former employer or manager
- Other professional acquaintance
- Other
Q07
MatrixRequired
How much do you agree with the following statements about the guarantor process?
4 rows × 5 columns
- The requirement was clearly communicated during onboarding
- The verification process was completed within a reasonable time
- The requirement felt fair given my role and salary level
- HR was supportive if I struggled to find a guarantor
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q08
Rating ScaleRequired
Overall, how would you rate your experience with the guarantor process?
Range: 1 – 5
Min:PoorMax:Excellent
Q09
Ranking
If we were to change how guarantee is handled, rank these alternatives from most to least preferred.
- Keep the current guarantor system
- Contract-based indemnity (no external guarantor needed)
- Employer-arranged insurance or bond
- Refundable salary deduction agreement
- Digital reference/background verification instead of a named guarantor
Drag to rank
Q10
AI Interview
Reconstruct exactly what happened the last time this employee had to provide a guarantor: what was required, how long it took, who they approached (and whether anyone declined), and where the process broke down or felt unfair. If they rated the experience poorly or difficulty finding a guarantor highly, dig into the specific obstacle (e.g., no qualifying family/colleague, distance, documentation) and what alternative arrangement would have solved it for them.
Q11
Multiple Choice
Which department are you part of?
- Operations
- Sales
- Finance
- Human Resources
- Engineering/IT
- Customer Support
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q12
Dropdown
How long have you worked at this company?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 1 year
- 1 to 3 years
- 3 to 5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
Q13
Multiple Choice
What is your employment type?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Contract
- Temporary
- Prefer not to say
Q14
Message
Thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses will be reviewed by HR to identify friction points and consider fairer or simpler alternatives to the current guarantor process.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Goes beyond collecting guarantor paperwork by measuring how clearly requirements were explained and how difficult it was to actually find an eligible guarantor, using paired opinion-scale questions.
- Includes a matrix of agreement statements and an overall rating to quantify perceived fairness, plus a ranking question so HR can see which alternative guarantee mechanisms employees would actually prefer.
- An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what happened the last time the employee had to provide a guarantor, surfacing the real friction points behind the scale scores rather than just a satisfaction number.
- Segments results by department, tenure, and employment type, and tracks 12-month frequency of guarantor requests, so patterns (e.g., high-turnover departments struggling most) are visible in the auto-generated report.
SurveySparrow
Employee Guarantor Form - Secure Employment AgreementsThis is the closest topical match, but it is framed as a form for capturing and formalizing a guarantor's details and agreement, not a survey for measuring employee experience with the requirement. It appears to be a fielding-ready form rather than a research instrument built to probe clarity, difficulty, or fairness perceptions.
What it does well
- Purpose-built for the guarantor use case, so terminology and fields likely map directly onto real employment-bond workflows
- Backed by a general-purpose survey/form platform, so it benefits from broad customization and distribution tools
- Framed around 'securing' agreements, suggesting it's optimized for formal documentation and record-keeping
Where it falls short
- Appears to be a static form for capturing guarantor data, not a survey designed to measure clarity, difficulty, or fairness of the requirement itself
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview to reconstruct what actually happened during a guarantor search
- No indication of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent, published question/prompt methodology
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.