All templates

Event Space Availability & Booking Experience Survey

Measures how easily event planners and renters can discover, confirm, and book available dates at your venue — from first inquiry to final confirmation. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly where the booking process broke down for people who struggled to find or lock in an open slot, so you can fix the friction points that cost you bookings.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

12 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience checking availability at (Replace with venue/company name). This helps us make it easier to find and book an open date. About 7 minutes.

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

What type of event were you trying to book space for?

  • Wedding or private celebration
  • Corporate meeting or offsite
  • Conference or large public event
  • Party or social gathering
  • Workshop or class
  • Other
Q03
Multiple ChoiceRequired

How did you first try to check date and time availability?

  • Venue's website or online calendar
  • Phone call
  • Email
  • In-person visit
  • Third-party booking platform
  • Social media message
Q04
Opinion ScaleRequired

How easy was it to find out whether your desired date and time were open?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q05
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Was your first-choice date and time available when you checked?

  • Yes, fully available
  • Only partially (e.g., wrong time slot or partial space)
  • No, but a nearby date worked
  • No, and I couldn't find an alternative that worked
Q06
MatrixRequired

Thinking about the overall booking process, how much do you agree with each statement?

5 rows × 5 columns
  • The online calendar or availability info was up to date
  • I received a response quickly after inquiring
  • Pricing was clear before I committed
  • Staff were helpful in working around my scheduling constraints
  • I felt confident my booking was secure once confirmed
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required

Which of these would most improve the experience of checking and booking availability?

  • A real-time online calendar showing open dates
  • Faster replies to inquiries
  • Ability to temporarily hold a date before paying
  • More flexible cancellation or rescheduling policy
  • Live chat with staff during business hours
  • Upfront, transparent pricing displayed online
  • A virtual tour available before booking
Pick best & worst per setBest:Would help mostWorst:Would help least
Q08
Number

About how many days in advance of your event date did you start checking availability?

Q09
AI Interview

Reconstruct exactly what happened when this respondent tried to confirm availability, anchoring on their answer about whether their first-choice date was open and any low ratings in the booking-process statements. If they hit friction (slow replies, unclear calendar, no hold option), get the specific moment it happened and what they did next — booked anyway, picked another date, or walked away. If everything went smoothly, ask what made it feel effortless so it can be replicated.

Q10
Rating ScaleRequired

Overall, how satisfied were you with the process of checking and confirming availability?

Range: 15
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q11
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your role in this booking?

  • Private individual booking for personal use
  • Professional event planner
  • Corporate or business representative
  • Nonprofit or community organizer
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Message

That's everything — thank you! Your answers will be used to streamline how we show and confirm availability, so future bookings feel faster and clearer.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that reconstructs exactly where the booking process broke down for respondents who struggled to find or lock in a date — something a static form can't do.
  • Combines an opinion scale, matrix, and max-diff question to quantify how easy availability-checking was and prioritize which fixes would help most.
  • Captures respondent role and event type up front so results can be segmented by planner type and booking use case.
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and auto-generated reports turn raw booking-friction feedback into an actionable summary without manual analysis.

SurveyMonkey

Event Space Availability Form Template

A fielding-ready form template aimed at the same core use case — collecting event space availability info. It's built for quick data capture (dates, space needs) rather than diagnosing why a booking attempt failed or stalled. Good for basic inquiry intake, less suited to root-cause analysis of lost bookings.

What it does well

  • Established, easy-to-deploy form builder with a ready-made template for this exact use case
  • Likely supports skip logic and basic reporting dashboards
  • Familiar platform for respondents, low friction to fill out

Where it falls short

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe where a specific booking attempt broke down
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent, publishable methodology for how questions were generated or scored

Typeform

Free Event Booking Form Template

A conversational-style booking form template, fielding-ready and focused on capturing booking requests rather than diagnosing availability-checking friction. It's designed for a smooth intake experience, not for reconstructing a respondent's specific booking journey.

What it does well

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI that's mobile-friendly
  • Likely supports conditional logic to branch based on booking details
  • Fast to set up for simple event booking intake

Where it falls short

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview to reconstruct where a booking attempt stalled
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated diagnostic reports
  • Fixed question flow with no adaptive probing based on a respondent's answers

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.