Mentor Program Effectiveness Evaluation Survey
Measures how well a mentorship relationship is working for the mentee — guidance quality, meeting consistency, and career impact — with an AI follow-up that digs into a specific moment mentorship helped or fell short, revealing what to fix before the next matching cycle.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the last 3 months, how often have you and your mentor met?
- Not at all
- Once
- 2-3 times
- Monthly or more
- Weekly or more
How well does your mentor understand your specific career goals?
How much do you agree with each statement about your mentor?
- Gives me actionable, specific advice
- Is accessible when I need to reach them
- Challenges me to grow, not just reassures me
- Follows through on commitments made in our sessions
- Helps me build useful connections or visibility
Rank these areas by how much your mentor has helped you in each so far.
- Technical or role-specific skills
- Career navigation and goal-setting
- Confidence and mindset
- Networking and visibility
- Work-life balance and wellbeing
How likely are you to recommend this mentorship program to a colleague?
Overall, has this mentorship relationship met your expectations?
- Far below expectations
- Somewhat below
- Met expectations
- Somewhat above
- Far exceeded expectations
Ask the respondent to walk through one specific, recent conversation or piece of advice from their mentor that genuinely changed how they approached something at work. Get concrete details: what the advice was, what they did differently, and what the outcome was. If they rated the relationship as below expectations, instead probe the specific moment or pattern that caused disappointment and what they wish had happened instead. Anchor follow-ups on their meeting frequency and 'understands goals' answers.
What's one thing your mentor could do differently to make this relationship more valuable to you?
How long have you been in this mentoring relationship?
- Less than 1 month
- 1-3 months
- 4-6 months
- 7-12 months
- Over a year
Which best describes your role level?
- Entry-level / individual contributor
- Mid-level
- Senior / staff
- Manager or above
- Prefer not to say
That wraps things up — thank you for the honest feedback! Program coordinators will use these responses, alongside your mentor's, to strengthen matching and support going forward.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that asks the mentee to walk through one specific recent conversation or moment, surfacing concrete detail on what worked or fell short.
- Combines structured measurement (meeting frequency, a goals-understanding opinion scale, a multi-statement agreement matrix, and a ranking of help areas) with open-ended reflection, so coordinators get both scorable data and narrative context.
- Captures program-health signals like recommendation likelihood and whether expectations were met, alongside role level and relationship duration, so results can be segmented before the next matching cycle.
- Ends with a clear thank-you and sets expectations that coordinators will review responses, plus a dedicated open text question on what the mentor could do differently.
Jotform
Mentor Evaluation Form TemplateA fielding-ready, customizable form builder template for evaluating mentors, benefiting from Jotform's drag-and-drop editor and integrations. It's a general-purpose form rather than a survey built specifically around mentee-reported career impact. No mention of adaptive follow-up questioning.
What it does well
- Ready-to-use, easily customizable form layout
- Backed by Jotform's broad integration and form-logic ecosystem
- Likely quick to deploy for basic mentor feedback collection
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe specific incidents
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis reports evident
- No transparent, published methodology or prompt logic behind the questions
Typeform
Mentor Evaluation Form TemplateA conversational, one-question-at-a-time template well-suited to Typeform's polished UX for mentor feedback. It offers a pleasant respondent experience but appears to be a fixed question flow rather than one that adapts based on answers. Reporting is likely limited to Typeform's standard response summaries.
What it does well
- Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
- Easy to customize branding and question wording
- Good completion rates typical of Typeform's UX design
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interviewing to dig into a specific mentorship moment
- No voice-based interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No automated quality scoring of individual responses
QuestionPro
Non Profit Mentoring Programs Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a sample questionnaire and guide focused on non-profit mentoring programs rather than a plug-and-play fielding template, so setup work is likely required. It covers broad program-level survey question ideas, which is useful for question inspiration but not tailored to a single mentee's ongoing relationship depth.
What it does well
- Provides example questions specifically framed for mentoring program context
- Backed by QuestionPro's established survey analytics platform
- Useful as a question-writing reference for program administrators
Where it falls short
- Presented as a guide/sample questionnaire, not a ready-to-field interactive survey
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview capability
- No transparent per-question methodology or automated quality scoring
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.