All templates

30-Day New Hire Onboarding Experience Survey

Captures how a new employee's first 30 days actually went — role clarity, manager support, tools access, and team integration — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment onboarding fell short. Built for HR and people teams who want to fix onboarding before new hires disengage or leave.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

13 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Welcome back! It's been about 30 days since you joined — we'd love to hear how onboarding actually went for you. Your honest feedback shapes what new hires experience next. This will take about 5 minutes.

Q02
Opinion ScaleRequired

Thinking about your role today, how clear are you on what's expected of you day to day?

Scale: 17
Min:Not clear at allMax:Completely clear
Q03
MatrixRequired

How much do you agree with each statement about your first 30 days?

5 rows × 5 columns
  • I received a clear 30/60/90-day plan for my role
  • My manager was accessible when I had questions
  • I had the equipment and system access I needed on day one
  • I understood how my role contributes to the team's goals
  • I felt welcomed by my team
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
Multiple ChoiceRequired

In your first 30 days, how many one-on-one check-ins did you have with your manager?

  • None
  • One
  • Two to three
  • Four to six
  • More than six
Q05
Rating ScaleRequired

How would you rate the support you got from your manager during onboarding?

Range: 15
Min:PoorMax:Excellent
Q06
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Do you currently have the tools and resources you need to do your job effectively?

  • Yes, fully
  • Mostly, a few gaps remain
  • Somewhat, several gaps remain
  • No, I'm missing key tools or access
Q07
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required

If you could change one thing about onboarding, which of these would make the biggest difference — and which would matter least?

  • Clearer role expectations and goals
  • Faster IT and equipment setup
  • More structured training schedule
  • More frequent manager check-ins
  • Better introductions to teammates
  • Clearer 30-60-90 day milestones
  • Smoother HR paperwork and benefits enrollment
Pick best & worst per setBest:Would improve onboarding the mostWorst:Would improve onboarding the least
Q08
Opinion ScaleRequired

Based on your first 30 days, how likely are you to recommend this company as a great place to work?

Scale: 010
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q09
AI Interview

Ask the respondent to walk through the single moment in their first 30 days where onboarding felt most confusing, unsupported, or frustrating — get specifics on what happened, who was involved, and what they wish had happened instead. If they rated manager support or role clarity low, anchor there; if everything scored well, probe what almost went wrong or could break for the next new hire. Close by asking what one change would have made the biggest difference.

Q10
Message

That's everything we need — thank you for the honest feedback! Your answers feed directly into how we redesign onboarding for future new hires, and HR will follow up on any specific gaps you flagged.

Q11
Multiple Choice

Which department are you part of?

  • Engineering
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer Support
  • Operations
  • Finance
  • People/HR
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice

What is your primary work arrangement?

  • Fully remote
  • Hybrid
  • Fully on-site
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your employment type?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Contract
  • Intern
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Goes beyond static rating questions with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to walk through the specific moment onboarding fell short, surfacing root causes a fixed-question survey can't reach.
  • Combines quantitative pulse checks (role clarity opinion scale, manager support rating, a matrix of agreement statements, max-diff prioritization) with open-ended probing in one flow.
  • Segments results automatically by department, work arrangement, and employment type, so HR can see whether onboarding gaps cluster in specific teams or hiring types.
  • Every response is automatically scored for quality and rolled into an auto-generated report, so HR teams get a synthesized read on onboarding health without manually reading transcripts.

Jotform

New Hire Onboarding Status Control Form Template

This is an internal HR/admin tracking form for monitoring onboarding task completion (paperwork, equipment, access), not a survey designed to capture the new hire's own experience. Useful for process control, but it doesn't ask employees how onboarding felt or where it fell short. Best viewed as a checklist template rather than a fielding-ready experience survey.

What it does well

  • Purpose-built for tracking onboarding task/status completion
  • Fits Jotform's broader form-builder and workflow ecosystem

Where it falls short

  • Not designed to capture employee sentiment, role clarity, or manager support
  • Static form fields with no adaptive follow-up questioning
  • No mechanism for probing a specific negative moment in the onboarding journey

SurveyMonkey

Onboarding Survey Template with Ready-to-Send Questions

A ready-to-send, fixed-question onboarding survey template aimed at gauging general new hire satisfaction. It's a genuine fielding-ready survey, backed by SurveyMonkey's established distribution and analytics tools, but the question set is static rather than adaptive.

What it does well

  • Ready-to-send template with an established survey distribution platform
  • Backed by broad benchmarking and analytics tooling

Where it falls short

  • Fixed question list with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific bad moment
  • No per-response quality scoring or automated qualitative synthesis
  • No transparent prompt/methodology disclosure since there's no AI interviewing layer

SurveySparrow

Onboarding Experience Feedback Form Template

A conversational-style feedback form focused on onboarding experience, in keeping with SurveySparrow's chat-like survey format. It captures structured feedback well but appears to be a fixed-flow form rather than one with true adaptive interviewing based on each answer.

What it does well

  • Conversational, chat-style UI that feels more human than a typical form
  • Focused specifically on onboarding experience feedback

Where it falls short

  • Chat-style presentation is scripted, not adaptive AI follow-up probing per response
  • No automated quality scoring of individual answers
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks

Typeform

New Hire Onboarding Form Template

A polished, conversational-style form template well suited to collecting general new hire information and feedback, leveraging Typeform's known design strengths. It's a fixed sequence of questions rather than a survey that adapts based on what a respondent says.

What it does well

  • Clean, engaging conversational form design
  • Easy to build and customize within Typeform's ecosystem

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore a respondent's specific onboarding pain point
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report synthesis
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task capability

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.