QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
Start free
All templates

Teacher Job Satisfaction & Retention Pulse Survey

Tracks how satisfied teachers are with workload, administrative support, pay, resources, and school culture, and flags retention risk before it shows up in resignation letters. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind each teacher's rating instead of settling for a number. Built for school leaders and district HR running an annual or mid-year staff pulse.

Use this templateBrowse more templates

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

13 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how things are really going at school. Your answers are used to improve support for teachers — nothing here is tied to your performance review. About 6 minutes.

Q02
Opinion ScaleRequired

Overall, how satisfied are you with your job as a teacher right now?

Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q03
MatrixRequired

How satisfied are you with each of the following aspects of your current role?

7 rows × 5 columns
  • Workload and hours
  • Administrative support
  • Compensation and benefits
  • Availability of teaching materials and resources
  • Professional development opportunities
  • +2 more
Columns: Very dissatisfied · Dissatisfied · Neutral · Satisfied · Very satisfied
Q04
Multiple ChoiceRequired

In the last month, how often did you have to work outside your contracted hours (grading, planning, or admin tasks) just to keep up?

  • Never
  • A few days a month
  • About once a week
  • Several times a week
  • Almost every day
Q05
Rating Scale

The last time you needed help with a classroom or behavioral challenge, how would you rate the support you got from school administration?

Range: 1 – 5
Min:No help at allMax:Extremely helpful
Q06
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required

Which of these changes would do the most to improve your job satisfaction — and which would matter least?

  • Higher pay or better benefits
  • Smaller class sizes
  • More paid planning time
  • More administrative support
  • Better classroom materials and resources
  • A more manageable overall workload
  • More input on curriculum decisions
  • Better mentoring or coaching
  • Improved student behavior support
Pick best & worst per setBest:Would help the mostWorst:Would help the least
Q07
Opinion ScaleRequired

How likely are you to recommend teaching at this school to a colleague looking for a job?

Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q08
AI Interview

Anchor on the respondent's recommend-to-a-colleague score and their workload rating. If the score is low (0-6), get a specific recent example of what made them hesitate — a particular week, incident, or unmet need — and ask what would need to change for that to improve. If the score is high (7-10), find out what specifically is working well so it can be protected or replicated elsewhere. Always probe whether workload or lack of administrative support played a role, and note any mention of considering leaving the profession or the school.

Q09
Multiple ChoiceRequired

How likely are you to still be teaching at this school next school year?

  • Very unlikely
  • Somewhat unlikely
  • Not sure
  • Somewhat likely
  • Very likely
Q10
Dropdown

How many years have you been teaching, including this year?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • More than 15 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
Multiple Choice

What grade level do you primarily teach?

  • Early childhood / Pre-K
  • Elementary (K-5)
  • Middle school (6-8)
  • High school (9-12)
  • Multiple levels / Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice

What is your current employment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Long-term substitute
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Message

Thank you for your honesty — this really helps. Responses are compiled into a school-wide report on teacher support and retention, and no individual answers are shared with your direct supervisor.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Goes beyond a single satisfaction score by pairing an overall rating with a matrix breakdown of workload, admin support, pay, resources, and culture
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that anchors on each teacher's recommend-to-a-colleague score and workload rating to dig into the actual incident behind a low score, not just the number
  • Uses a max-diff question to force-rank which specific changes would most improve satisfaction, giving school leaders a prioritized action list instead of a vague sentiment score
  • Directly asks retention-signal questions (likelihood to still be teaching next year, recommend-to-a-colleague) alongside tenure and role context, so flight-risk staff can be flagged before a resignation letter

Jotform

Teacher Satisfaction Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready static form template covering standard teacher satisfaction topics, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize and deploy quickly but relies on fixed questions rather than any adaptive follow-up. Best suited for teams that want a simple, no-frills satisfaction check rather than deeper diagnostic insight.

What it does well

  • Quick to deploy and customize using a familiar drag-and-drop builder
  • Integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (notifications, storage, integrations)

Where it falls short

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to probe the reasoning behind a low rating
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or generated report tying scores to specific incidents

SurveySparrow

Teacher Satisfaction Survey

SurveySparrow's template offers a conversational-style survey format, which makes the experience feel less clinical than a typical form. It covers common satisfaction dimensions but the flow is still pre-scripted rather than dynamically driven by each respondent's answers. Useful for a friendlier survey feel, but not a substitute for a true follow-up interview.

What it does well

  • Conversational chat-style UI that can feel more engaging than a plain form
  • Part of a broader survey platform with reporting and distribution tools

Where it falls short

  • Conversational tone does not equate to adaptive AI probing — question sequence is still pre-set, not tailored to each answer
  • No mention of voice AI interviews or guided screen-share tasks for deeper qualitative context

Typeform

Teacher Satisfaction Survey Form

Typeform's template delivers its signature one-question-at-a-time interface, which tends to boost completion rates for straightforward satisfaction surveys. It's a polished, ready-to-field form, but like other form builders it collects static responses without any mechanism to dig deeper into a specific low score. Good for a clean, simple pulse check rather than root-cause analysis.

What it does well

  • Polished, well-known one-question-at-a-time UX that's fast to fill out
  • Easy to launch with minimal setup for a standard satisfaction pulse

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to uncover the specific incident behind a rating
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of individual responses

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Use this templateStart free