Q01
Message
All templates
Unmoderated Usability Test with Screen Share & Voice
A self-serve usability session: participants share their screen, complete guided tasks on your website or prototype while thinking aloud, and the AI moderator watches, prompts, and probes — then debriefs them. You get recordings, transcripts, and task-level analysis without scheduling a single session.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
7 questions · ~10 min
Q02
ConsentRequired
Before we start, please review and confirm.
Q03
Multiple ChoiceRequired
How familiar are you with our product?
- I use it regularly
- I've tried it once or twice
- This is my first time seeing it
Q04
Voice AI Interview
Moderated task session
Moderate a think-aloud usability session. For each task: read the task aloud, then stay quiet while the participant works — prompt only if they go silent for a while ('What are you thinking right now?', 'What did you exp…
Q05
Opinion ScaleRequired
Overall, how easy or difficult was it to complete the tasks?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q06
Opinion ScaleRequired
How likely would you be to use this product for real, based on what you just experienced?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q07
Message
Thank you — that was genuinely helpful. Your recording and reasoning go straight to the team who can fix what you struggled with.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Guided tasks with screen share and recording, moderated by an AI that prompts think-aloud, never leads, and debriefs at the end — no scheduling, no moderator hours
- Recording consent is built into the flow, and every session produces a transcript plus task-level analysis
- Standard measures included (SEQ-style ease rating, adoption likelihood) so results benchmark across rounds
- The moderator asks the question human moderators forget under time pressure: 'what did you expect that to do?'
Maze
Usability Testing Template (Testing a New Product)A structured unmoderated usability template that mixes screening, scenario-based tasks, expectation-validation, and open-ended wrap-up, backed by automatic behavioral metrics (bounce rates, misclicks, heatmaps) and reporting within hours. Very strong on quantitative interaction capture, but follow-up questions are pre-scripted rather than adaptive to what a participant just did.
What it does well
- Scenario/task framing ('imagine you were trying to accomplish X') that produces realistic task-based testing
- Combines expectation-validation questions with open-ended wrap-up for qualitative signal
- Automatic behavioral metrics: bounce rates, misclicks, heatmaps, and a usability score for prototype navigation
- Automated reporting delivered within hours, lowering analyst effort
Where it falls short
- Follow-up questions are fixed in the flow; there is no AI probing when a participant struggles or gives a surprising answer
- Unmoderated by design means no live voice interviewer to ask 'why did you do that?' in the moment
- Screen interaction is captured as heatmaps/misclicks, not a full guided-task screen-share recording with narration
- Insights are metric-driven; less emphasis on a synthesized qualitative narrative per participant
Maze
11 Usability Testing Templates for Building Great ProductsA library of 11 purpose-specific usability templates spanning planning, prototype testing, mobile, feature discoverability, sign-up flow, and standardized instruments (SUS, SEQ) plus a reporting template. Excellent breadth and inclusion of validated metrics, but each is a self-serve question/task form with no adaptive interviewer or voice component.
What it does well
- Broad coverage: plan, early-prototype, new-product, mobile, feature-discoverability, sign-up-flow, and feedback templates in one library
- Includes validated quantitative instruments (System Usability Scale, Single Ease Question) for benchmarkable scores
- Ships a matching usability-testing report template so findings roll straight into a stakeholder deliverable
- Metrics baked in: task completion, misclicks, time-on-task, difficulty ratings
Where it falls short
- Templates are static task/question sets, so they cannot ask an adaptive AI follow-up when a task fails
- No voice-AI interview mode to capture think-aloud reasoning conversationally
- No guided-task screen-share + recording flow; behavioral signal is limited to click/heatmap metrics
- Report template is a manual fill-in rather than an auto-written report generated from the session data
SurveySparrow
Website Usability Survey TemplateA website usability feedback survey in chat format — good for scaled self-reported usability sentiment. It asks users what they think of the site; it cannot watch them actually use it.
What it does well
- Quick way to collect usability sentiment from real visitors at scale
- Conversational format keeps completion rates healthy
- Recurring runs support tracking scores across releases
Where it falls short
- Self-report only — no screen share, no task observation, no recordings
- No think-aloud moderation or expectation probing at the moment of confusion
- No task-level success metrics, just opinions after the fact
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.