Customer Support Request Experience Survey
Captures how a recent support request went — channel used, effort required, resolution status, and satisfaction — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into what actually happened during the interaction, not just the rating given. Built for support and CX teams tracking ticket quality beyond CSAT scores.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which channel did you use for your most recent support request?
- Live chat
- Phone
- Help center / self-service article
- Social media
- Other
Overall, how easy or difficult was it to get the help you needed?
What is the current status of the issue you contacted us about?
- Fully resolved
- Partially resolved
- Not resolved
- Still waiting on a response
Thinking about the person or resource that helped you, how much do you agree with each statement?
- The support agent (or article) understood my issue
- The explanation or instructions were clear
- I was given a realistic timeline for resolution
- The outcome met my expectations
How satisfied are you with this support experience overall?
How many separate times did you have to reach out before this issue reached its current status?
Rank these in order of what matters most to you when contacting support (most important first).
- Speed of response
- Getting it resolved correctly the first time
- Friendliness of the agent
- Ease of reaching support
- Being kept informed along the way
Reconstruct exactly what happened during this support interaction: what the respondent originally asked for, what the agent or article actually did, and where the friction was if the issue wasn't fully resolved or the effort rating was low. If they gave a high satisfaction score, confirm what specifically the agent or process did right so it can be reinforced. If they rated the issue as 'still waiting,' probe how long it's been and whether they've received any updates.
Is there anything else about this support experience you'd like us to know?
How long have you been a customer with us?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-12 months
- 1-3 years
- More than 3 years
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes directly to our support team and is used to improve how we help customers like you.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Goes beyond a single CSAT number with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened during the support interaction — what the rep did, what worked, what didn't — instead of just capturing a rating.
- Pairs objective operational data (channel used, resolution status, number of repeat contacts) with subjective measures (effort, satisfaction, and a matrix on the helper/resource) for a fuller picture of ticket quality.
- Includes a ranking question that surfaces what customers actually prioritize in support (speed, empathy, resolution, etc.), giving CX teams a preference signal that flat rating scales miss.
- Automated per-response quality scoring and auto-generated reports come standard, with an optional voice AI interview mode — available on a free tier or the $50/mo Business plan.
Jotform
Support Request Form TemplateA static drag-and-drop form aimed at capturing support requests for internal ticket intake rather than post-resolution experience feedback. Good for structured data collection and integrations, but not built to probe how the interaction actually unfolded. Fielding-ready template, but limited to fixed fields.
What it does well
- Easy drag-and-drop customization
- Broad integration ecosystem for routing submissions
- Simple to deploy for internal ops teams
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe what happened during the interaction
- Static field set with no automated quality scoring
- No published methodology or transparent prompt logic
SurveyMonkey
Request Form TemplateA general-purpose request form template from an established survey platform, more oriented toward intake than deep post-support experience analysis. Offers solid distribution and reporting tools, but the template itself appears to be a fixed-question form rather than a CX-specific evaluation instrument.
What it does well
- Mature survey distribution and analytics tooling
- Familiar, trusted platform for respondents
- Quick to launch with existing templates
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interviewing to dig into the specifics of a support interaction
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No voice AI interview option
Typeform
Support Request Form TemplateA conversational, one-question-at-a-time form that likely drives strong completion rates and a polished respondent experience. It's a static template, though, built for intake rather than reconstructing the details of a past support interaction.
What it does well
- Clean, conversational UI that can improve completion rates
- Strong visual/branding customization
- Good mobile-friendly respondent experience
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning based on prior answers
- No automated quality scoring of responses
- No transparent prompt methodology published
QuestionPro
Customer Support Service Evaluation Survey TemplateAn enterprise-oriented evaluation survey covering typical CX metrics and likely offering multiple question types and reporting dashboards. It's a genuinely comparable template for support experience tracking, but appears to rely on fixed question sets rather than dynamic, AI-driven probing.
What it does well
- Enterprise survey feature set with varied question types
- Established reporting/dashboard capabilities
- Built specifically for service evaluation use cases
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to reconstruct what actually happened
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No voice AI interview option or transparent prompt disclosure
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.