QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
Start free
All templates

Team & Group Project Performance Evaluation

Captures how a group or team performed on a shared project — coordination, workload fairness, communication, and overall output quality — for managers, educators, or project leads reviewing team dynamics after a collaboration ends. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision that most helped or hurt the group's performance, going beyond generic ratings.

Use this templateBrowse more templates

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

13 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your recent group project or team collaboration. Your honest input helps improve how teams are formed and supported going forward. This should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
Short TextRequired

Which group, team, or project are you evaluating? (Replace with your specific team/project name if this is being sent for a single group.)

Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired

Overall, how well did this group achieve the goals it set out to accomplish?

Scale: 1 – 10
Min:Did not achieve goalsMax:Fully achieved goals
Q04
MatrixRequired

Rate the group on each of the following aspects of how it worked together.

5 rows × 5 columns
  • Communication among members
  • Coordination and planning
  • Handling of disagreements or conflict
  • Quality of the final output
  • Meeting deadlines
Columns: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
Multiple ChoiceRequired

How was the workload distributed among group members?

  • Very unevenly - a few people did most of the work
  • Somewhat unevenly
  • Fairly evenly
  • Very evenly - everyone contributed similarly
Q06
RankingRequired

Rank the following factors by how much they affected this group's performance, from biggest impact to smallest.

  1. Clarity of roles and responsibilities
  2. Quality of communication
  3. Leadership within the group
  4. Skills and experience of members
  5. Time and resources available
  6. Personal motivation of members
Drag to rank
Q07
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required

Which of these teamwork behaviors mattered most, and which mattered least, to how well this group performed?

  • Clear roles from the start
  • Timely, responsive communication
  • Mutual respect between members
  • Equal effort from everyone
  • Constructive conflict resolution
  • Shared decision-making
  • Accountability for missed commitments
  • Flexibility when plans changed
Pick best & worst per setBest:Mattered mostWorst:Mattered least
Q08
Opinion ScaleRequired

How likely would you be to want to work with this same group again on a future project?

Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q09
AI Interview

Probe the specific incident or decision that most shaped this respondent's rating of the group's performance — anchor on the lowest-rated item from the teamwork matrix (communication, coordination, conflict, output quality, or deadlines) and ask for a concrete example of what happened. If they flagged uneven workload, ask who they felt over- or under-contributed and what could have rebalanced it. If ratings were uniformly high, ask what specific practice the group should keep doing on its next project.

Q10
Long Text

Is there anything else about how this group worked together that these questions didn't capture?

Q11
Multiple Choice

What was your role in this group?

  • Group lead / coordinator
  • Regular member/contributor
  • Supporting or advisory role
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice

How large was this group?

  • 2-3 people
  • 4-6 people
  • 7-10 people
  • More than 10 people
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Message

Thank you for sharing your perspective! Responses across the group will be combined into a summary report used to improve how future teams are set up and supported — individual answers are not shared with teammates.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific incident or decision that most shaped a respondent's scores, rather than stopping at a number.
  • Combines structured measurement (opinion scales on goal achievement, a matrix rating teamwork dimensions, ranking and max-diff on performance factors) with open reflection, giving both quantifiable and narrative data.
  • Captures context that matters for interpreting results — workload distribution, role in the group, and group size — so managers or educators can segment findings accurately.
  • Automatically compiles individual responses into a report, saving the manual synthesis work required after fielding a static form.

Jotform

Group Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use static form template for rating group work, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize fields and branding, but it is a fixed-question form rather than an interview experience. Good for quick, low-cost data collection without deeper follow-up.

What it does well

  • Fast to customize and deploy via drag-and-drop builder
  • Part of a large existing template library for quick starting points
  • Familiar, simple form format for respondents

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — every respondent sees the same fixed items
  • No AI or voice interview capability to probe specific incidents
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

Typeform

Group Evaluation Form Template

Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time format makes filling out a group evaluation feel more engaging than a traditional form. It still relies on pre-set static questions, so any deeper context has to come from open-text fields read manually. Best suited for a pleasant respondent experience rather than adaptive probing.

What it does well

  • Polished, conversational UI that can improve completion rates
  • Simple sharing and embedding
  • Clean visual design out of the box

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — the flow is scripted regardless of answers given
  • No voice interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No automated scoring or report generation; results still need manual interpretation

QuestionPro

Performance Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a general performance evaluation questionnaire and question-bank resource rather than a template built specifically for team/group project reviews. It offers enterprise survey features and analytics dashboards, but the sample questions are broad and would need significant editing for team-collaboration context. Reads more like a guide with sample items than a fielding-ready group project template.

What it does well

  • Enterprise-grade survey platform with analytics dashboards
  • Large bank of sample performance-review questions to draw from
  • Established platform with broad survey logic and reporting features

Where it falls short

  • Not purpose-built for team/group project dynamics — questions are generic performance-review items needing rework
  • No adaptive AI or voice interview to dig into specific team incidents
  • No transparent, published interview-prompt methodology or automated quality scoring per response

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Use this templateStart free