360-Degree Peer & Manager Feedback Review
Gathers structured multi-rater feedback—from managers, peers, direct reports, and self—on an employee's core competencies and overall effectiveness. An AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete behavioral examples behind the ratings, turning vague impressions into specific, actionable evidence for development conversations.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
What is your working relationship with (Employee Name)?
- Manager
- Direct report
- Peer / colleague
- Cross-functional partner
- Self-assessment (this is my own review)
Rate (Employee Name) on each area based on what you've directly observed in the last review period.
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- +1 more
Overall, how effective is (Employee Name) in their current role?
Which one area best describes (Employee Name)'s greatest strength right now?
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- Adaptability to change
Which one area is the biggest opportunity for (Employee Name) to grow?
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- Adaptability to change
Probe for a specific, recent example that illustrates both the strength and the growth area the respondent selected: what exactly did (Employee Name) do, in what situation, and what was the observable impact on the team or work? Anchor back to their overall effectiveness rating and ask what would need to change for that score to go up. If the respondent gave uniformly high ratings with no concrete detail, push gently for one real moment rather than a general impression; if they gave low ratings, ask what they'd want (Employee Name) to try differently in the next 30 days.
Describe one specific, recent example where you saw (Employee Name) demonstrate the strength you selected above. What did they do, and what was the impact?
What's one thing (Employee Name) could start, stop, or do differently to be more effective in their role?
How likely would you be to choose to work with (Employee Name) again on a future project or team?
How long have you worked with (Employee Name)?
- Less than 6 months
- 6-12 months
- 1-2 years
- More than 2 years
- Prefer not to say
Which department are you in? (Template note: replace with your own department list before launching.)
- Engineering
- Sales
- Marketing
- Operations
- Customer Support
- People / HR
- Other
- Prefer not to say
That completes (Employee Name)'s 360-degree review. Thank you for the thoughtful feedback — it will be synthesized alongside other reviewers' input and shared with the employee's manager to support their development plan.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes for a recent, concrete example illustrating both the rated strength and growth area — turning vague ratings into actionable evidence, not just a static comment box
- Combines structured multi-rater inputs (manager, peer, direct report, self) via a working-relationship question with matrix competency ratings, an overall effectiveness opinion scale, and open strength/growth pickers in one flow
- Pairs quantitative signals (competency matrix, effectiveness scale, 'work with again' likelihood scale) with qualitative long-text prompts on specific behaviors and one thing to start/stop/do differently — built for real development conversations, not just scoring
- Uses transparent, visible prompts throughout (the AI follow-up interview's probing intent is stated in plain language) rather than a black-box adaptive engine
Jotform
360 Degree Review Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable 360 review form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, likely with rating fields and comment boxes. Good for quick deployment and integration with Jotform's broader form ecosystem, but it's a static form template rather than an interview-driven feedback tool. No indication of adaptive follow-up or automated qualitative analysis of open responses.
What it does well
- Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
- Likely supports standard rating scales and comment fields for quick setup
- Broad integrations with Jotform's app ecosystem (e.g., for storage, notifications)
Where it falls short
- Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up to probe vague ratings for concrete behavioral examples
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how responses are structured or scored
- No voice AI interview option for raters who prefer speaking over typing
QuestionPro
360-degree Review Survey TemplateA survey-platform template for 360 reviews with QuestionPro's standard survey logic (branching, scales, reporting dashboards). It's positioned as a fielding-ready enterprise survey template with decent reporting depth, but like most survey tools it relies on fixed question sets rather than dynamic interviewing. No mention of AI-driven probing or per-response quality scoring.
What it does well
- Enterprise-grade survey platform with established reporting and dashboard tools
- Likely supports skip logic and multiple rater types within one survey
- Established analytics suite for aggregating multi-rater scores
Where it falls short
- Fixed question sequence — no adaptive AI interview to dig deeper into individual answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring of open-text feedback
- No transparent, visible AI prompt methodology published on the page
SurveySparrow
Manager 360 Feedback TemplateA conversational-style survey template focused specifically on manager 360 feedback, using SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to make form-filling feel more natural. It's a fielding-ready template but scoped to manager feedback rather than full multi-rater (peer/direct-report/self) review, and the conversational format is scripted rather than adaptively AI-driven.
What it does well
- Conversational, chat-style interface that may feel more engaging than a static form
- Purpose-built framing for manager-specific feedback
- Mobile-friendly presentation typical of SurveySparrow's product
Where it falls short
- Narrower scope (manager feedback) versus a full multi-rater 360 including peers, direct reports, and self
- Conversational UI is pre-scripted, not adaptive — no AI follow-up that probes individual answers for specifics
- No indication of automated quality scoring or voice AI interview capability
Typeform
360 Degree Review Form TemplateA polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time form template well-suited to 360 reviews, leveraging Typeform's known strength in respondent experience. It's fielding-ready out of the box, but it's a fixed form flow — there's no dynamic AI interviewing to follow up on vague or generic answers with targeted probing.
What it does well
- Clean, one-question-at-a-time UX that Typeform is well known for
- Easy to customize branding and question wording
- Likely mobile-responsive and quick to deploy
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview — all questions are fixed regardless of how a rater answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring or structured behavioral-evidence extraction
- No published prompt transparency or voice AI interview option
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.