Q01
Message
All templates
Peer Feedback and Working Relationship Survey
Gathers structured peer feedback on a specific colleague's collaboration, reliability, and communication habits, plus a best-worst ranking of their standout strengths. An AI follow-up interview digs into a concrete recent example behind the ratings, so the feedback reads as evidence, not just scores.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
10 questions · ~6 min
Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired
What is your working relationship with this person? (Template note: pair this survey with a single named colleague per send.)
- Direct peer or teammate
- Their manager
- Their direct report
- Cross-functional partner
Q03
MatrixRequired
Based on your experience working with this person in the last few months, how often do they do each of the following?
5 rows × 4 columns
- Communicates clearly and proactively
- Follows through on commitments and deadlines
- Collaborates well across teams or functions
- Responds constructively when given feedback
- Takes initiative on problems outside their core role
Columns: Rarely · Sometimes · Usually · Almost always
Q04
Opinion ScaleRequired
How likely are you to want to work with this person again on a future project?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q05
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required
From this list, which trait is most and least representative of this person?
- Clear communication
- Reliability
- Technical expertise
- Collaboration
- Problem-solving
- Mentorship
- Adaptability
- Initiative
Pick best & worst per setBest:Most representativeWorst:Least representative
Q06
Multiple ChoiceRequired
If this person focused on developing one area, which would have the biggest impact on their effectiveness?
- Clearer or more frequent communication
- Following through more consistently
- Collaborating earlier with other teams
- Taking more initiative
- Deeper technical skill
- Mentoring or supporting others more
Q07
AI InterviewRequired
Ask the respondent to walk through one specific, recent situation where they worked with this person, focusing on what the person did well and what got in the way if anything. If the respondent flagged a growth area above, probe for a concrete example of that gap and what a better version of that moment would have looked like. Avoid letting the answer stay abstract — anchor on one real event, not a general impression.
Q08
Long Text
Anything else about this person's impact on the team you'd like to add?
Q09
Multiple Choice
Which best describes your own role level? (Optional, used only to see if feedback patterns differ by seniority.)
- Individual contributor
- Manager
- Senior leader
- Prefer not to say
Q10
Message
Thank you for the thoughtful feedback. Your ratings and comments will be summarized alongside other feedback for this person to support their development conversation.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Combines structured rating questions (matrix of collaboration/reliability/communication habits, opinion scale, best-worst ranking of strengths) with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to walk through one specific, recent example behind their ratings.
- Turns generic scores into evidence: the AI interview probes for a concrete situation, so reports include real examples rather than just numbers.
- Includes role-level context (optional) so feedback patterns can be checked against seniority, plus a closing message setting expectations that responses will be summarized for the colleague.
- Auto-generates a report from the combined rating and interview data, removing manual write-up work for whoever compiles peer feedback.
Jotform
Peer Feedback FormsA template gallery page offering multiple static peer feedback form layouts that can be customized with Jotform's form builder. Good for quick deployment and integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem, but it's a fixed-question form rather than an interview-style survey. No mention of follow-up probing or automated scoring of open responses.
What it does well
- Multiple ready-made form layouts to choose from
- Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's builder
- Can embed in existing workflows/integrations Jotform supports
Where it falls short
- Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up questions to get at specifics behind a rating
- No automated quality scoring of open-text responses
- No published methodology for how questions were designed or validated
SurveyMonkey
Workplace Peer Feedback TemplateA single ready-to-use peer feedback survey template built for SurveyMonkey's platform, with standard rating and open-text questions. It benefits from SurveyMonkey's reporting dashboards and distribution tools, but the question set is fixed at send-time with no dynamic branching based on individual answers. There's no voice-based or interview component.
What it does well
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and analytics tools
- Simple, familiar rating-scale question format for respondents
- Quick to launch as a fielding-ready template
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into specific examples behind ratings
- No voice AI interview option
- No automated per-response quality scoring of open-ended answers
Typeform
Peer Feedback Form TemplateA conversational-style, fielding-ready form template using Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UI, which makes it feel more personal than a typical grid form. It still relies on pre-set questions rather than any AI-driven follow-up, and reporting is limited to Typeform's standard results summaries.
What it does well
- Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
- Fielding-ready template that's quick to publish
- Good completion-friendly design for shorter feedback forms
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to probe for concrete examples
- No automated quality scoring of responses
- No transparent, published prompt/methodology behind question design
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.