Q01
Message
All templates
Software Tool Evaluation & Adoption Fit Survey
Captures how a software tool actually performed during a trial, pilot, or proof-of-concept — usability, integrations, support, and value for cost — and ranks which factors matter most to the decision. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real story behind the adoption call, including near-misses and blockers. Built for engineering, IT, and product teams running a formal tool evaluation.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
13 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired
Which best describes your role in this evaluation?
- Primary evaluator / decision maker
- Team member trying it hands-on
- Manager reviewing the team's recommendation
- IT or security reviewer
- Other
Q03
Multiple ChoiceRequired
How long have you been using (Replace with software name) during this evaluation?
- Less than a week
- 1-2 weeks
- 3-4 weeks
- More than a month
Q04
MatrixRequired
Rate (Replace with software name) on each of the following:
6 rows × 5 columns
- Ease of use
- Performance and speed
- Documentation quality
- Integration with your existing tools
- Customer or community support responsiveness
- +1 more
Columns: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
Rating ScaleRequired
How easy was it to get set up and running with (Replace with software name)?
Range: 1 – 5
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q06
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required
From the factors below, which matters most and which matters least when deciding whether to adopt this tool?
- Ease of use
- Integration options
- Performance and speed
- Pricing
- Customer support
- Security and compliance
- Customization
- Documentation and onboarding resources
Pick best & worst per setBest:Matters mostWorst:Matters least
Q07
Point AllocationRequired
Allocate 100 points across these factors based on how much each actually influenced your evaluation so far.
- Functionality
- Ease of use
- Price
- Support quality
- Security
Allocate 100 points
Q08
Multiple Choice
Did you evaluate any alternative tools alongside (Replace with software name)?
- Yes, a formal side-by-side comparison
- Yes, informally
- No
- Not sure
Q09
Opinion ScaleRequired
How likely are you to recommend (Replace with software name) to a colleague facing a similar need?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q10
AI Interview
Reconstruct the real story behind this evaluation, anchored on the recommendation score and the top-ranked factor from the trade-off question. Ask what specifically happened that produced that score, whether there was a moment they nearly gave up on the tool or nearly decided against it, and what would need to change for their confidence to go up. If they mention integration or support issues, get the concrete detail (what broke, how long it took to resolve) rather than a general impression.
Q11
Long Text
What's the single biggest gap or blocker that would stop your team from fully adopting (Replace with software name)?
Q12
Multiple Choice
How large is your team or department?
- 1-5 people
- 6-20 people
- 21-100 people
- More than 100 people
- Prefer not to say
Q13
Message
That's everything — thank you! Your feedback feeds directly into the go/no-go decision on (Replace with software name), and we'll share the outcome with everyone who took part.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Goes beyond scored matrix and setup-ease ratings to include a MaxDiff and constant-sum exercise so teams can quantify which factors (cost, integrations, support, usability) actually drove the decision
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the real story behind the recommendation, surfacing near-misses and blockers that fixed-choice questions can't capture
- Captures context often missing from generic templates — role in the evaluation, trial duration, alternatives considered, and team size — so responses can be segmented and weighted properly
- Ends with a long-text blocker question and an auto-generated report designed to feed directly into a go/no-go adoption decision
Jotform
Software Evaluation Form TemplateA ready-to-use, drag-and-drop form template covering basic software evaluation criteria. It's built for quick customization and embedding rather than for structured decision analysis. Good for simple feedback collection, but lacks any mechanism to prioritize factors or dig into the reasoning behind scores.
What it does well
- Easy drag-and-drop customization
- Fast to deploy and embed on a webpage
- Familiar Jotform ecosystem (integrations, notifications)
Where it falls short
- No adaptive follow-up interview to probe why a score was given
- No built-in method to rank or weight which factors mattered most in the decision
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent methodology
QuestionPro
20 Software Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is primarily a guide/article listing sample questions and best practices rather than a fielding-ready survey. Useful as inspiration for question wording, but a researcher would still need to build the actual survey logic themselves. No structured prioritization or narrative-reconstruction tools are included.
What it does well
- Broad list of sample question ideas for coverage
- Educational framing on what to ask and why
- Backed by an established survey platform if built out further
Where it falls short
- Not a ready-to-field template — requires manual assembly
- No adaptive AI interview or voice interview option
- No mechanism for ranking or point-allocating decision factors
SurveyMonkey
Software Evaluation Survey TemplateA standard fielding-ready template with typical satisfaction and feature-rating questions, backed by SurveyMonkey's established distribution and analytics tools. It works well for broad usability feedback but treats every respondent's answers as static, with no way to reconstruct the story behind a rating.
What it does well
- Fielding-ready with SurveyMonkey's distribution and panel options
- Familiar reporting dashboards
- Quick to launch for general feedback
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview to surface blockers and near-misses
- No constant-sum or MaxDiff-style prioritization of decision factors
- No automated quality scoring of open-text responses
SurveySparrow
Software Evaluation Form TemplateA conversational-style form template that improves respondent experience over static grids, fielding-ready out of the box. It's still a fixed question flow, though, so it can't adapt questions in real time based on what a respondent says. Good for lightweight, friendly feedback collection rather than deep decision-reconstruction.
What it does well
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI improves completion rates
- Fielding-ready template
- Mobile-friendly presentation
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI probing or voice interview capability
- No factor-weighting tools like MaxDiff or constant-sum allocation
- No transparent, published interview methodology or automated quality scoring
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.