All templates

Social Studies Course Evaluation Survey

Measures how students experienced a social studies course — material relevance, teaching clarity, discussion quality, and which units actually landed — for teachers, department heads, and curriculum teams reviewing a course after a term. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind students' recommend score and topic preferences instead of stopping at the number.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

12 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on this social studies course. Your honest feedback helps shape how it's taught next time — this should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

In a typical week this course, how often did you complete the assigned readings or materials before class?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • About half the time
  • Most weeks
  • Every week
Q03
MatrixRequired

How much do you agree with each statement about this course?

5 rows × 5 columns
  • The course materials connected to real-world issues or events
  • The instructor explained concepts in ways I could understand
  • Class discussions encouraged me to think critically, not just memorize facts
  • Assignments and tests reflected what was actually taught in class
  • The pace of the course was appropriate for the material covered
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required

Which of these course units did you find most valuable versus least valuable to your learning? (Template note: replace the units below with your actual course topics before launching.)

  • World History
  • U.S. History
  • Geography
  • Civics & Government
  • Economics
  • World Cultures
  • Current Events
Pick best & worst per setBest:Most valuableWorst:Least valuable
Q05
Multiple Choice

Which teaching method in this course helped you learn best?

  • Lectures
  • Small-group discussion
  • Analyzing primary sources
  • Videos or multimedia
  • Debates or simulations
  • Group projects
Q06
Rating Scale

How would you rate the quality of feedback you received on assignments and tests?

Range: 15
Min:Not helpfulMax:Extremely helpful
Q07
Opinion ScaleRequired

How likely are you to recommend this course to another student with similar interests?

Scale: 010
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q08
AI Interview

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommend score, anchoring on specifics from the course rather than general impressions — ask for a moment or assignment that shaped that score. Then explore why they picked their most and least valuable units in the trade-off question: what made one stick and the other fall flat. If they rushed through the agreement statements or gave a low completion-of-readings answer, gently probe what got in the way of engaging with the material.

Q09
Long Text

If you could change one thing about this course, what would it be?

Q10
Multiple Choice

What is your current grade level or year?

  • 9th grade
  • 10th grade
  • 11th grade
  • 12th grade
  • Undergraduate
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
Multiple Choice

Before taking this course, how would you describe your interest in social studies?

  • Not interested
  • Slightly interested
  • Moderately interested
  • Very interested
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Message

That's everything — thank you for your thoughtful answers! Your responses will be shared with the teaching team to help improve how this course is taught in the future.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Goes beyond a recommend score with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific reasoning behind a student's rating and unit preferences
  • Includes a max-diff unit ranking exercise to surface which specific units landed versus fell flat, not just an overall satisfaction number
  • Pairs a teaching-method multiple-choice question with a matrix of course agreement statements, giving both quantitative and qualitative signal on clarity and discussion quality
  • Captures prior interest level and grade/year alongside a long-text 'what would you change' question, giving curriculum teams context for interpreting results

QuestionPro

Social studies course evaluation survey questions + sample questionnaire template

This is the most directly comparable page, offering a sample questionnaire specifically for social studies course evaluation. It's a static question bank meant to be copied or lightly customized rather than an adaptive interview experience. Useful as a starting question list but doesn't dig deeper into individual responses.

What it does well

  • Subject-specific to social studies, so questions are pre-aligned to the same use case
  • Presented as a ready sample questionnaire, easy to review and adapt quickly
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type support

Where it falls short

  • Fixed question list with no adaptive follow-up to explore why a student gave a particular rating
  • No mention of voice-based interviewing or guided screen-share tasks
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions were designed or scored

Jotform

Create Free Course Evaluation Forms - Course Evaluation Form Templates

This is a category/gallery page of generic course evaluation form templates rather than a social-studies-specific instrument, so it requires manual customization for this use case. It's a form-builder product, strong on layout and integrations but not tailored to curriculum-review needs out of the box. No academic-specific version is presented.

What it does well

  • Large template gallery covering many course-evaluation variants to start from
  • Drag-and-drop form builder makes customization straightforward
  • Free tier available for basic form creation

Where it falls short

  • Generic templates aren't tailored to social studies content, unit rankings, or discussion quality
  • Static form fields with no adaptive AI follow-up questioning
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

SurveyMonkey

Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback Guide

This template is built around corporate/professional training evaluation rather than an academic social studies course, so several questions and framing won't map cleanly onto a classroom curriculum review. It reads partly as a feedback guide with explanatory content alongside the template itself. Still relevant as a general course-feedback comparison point.

What it does well

  • Well-known survey platform with reliable distribution and reporting tools
  • Guide-style content explains why each question is included, useful for question design reference
  • Established templating system with logic and skip options

Where it falls short

  • Oriented toward corporate training, not academic course content like units or discussion quality
  • No adaptive AI interview to probe the reasoning behind a recommend score
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring per response

SurveySparrow

Sample Course Evaluation Form Template | Collect Instructor Feedback

This template centers on instructor feedback broadly across courses rather than social-studies-specific content like unit relevance or discussion quality. It's a ready-to-field static form, which is useful as a baseline but doesn't adapt based on how a student answers. Good as a general education-sector comparison.

What it does well

  • Education-sector focused, so terminology aligns reasonably well with academic settings
  • Conversational form UI that may feel more engaging than a plain form
  • Ready-to-use template requiring minimal setup

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning to explore the 'why' behind a recommendation score
  • No unit-level ranking mechanism (like max-diff) to identify which topics landed
  • No published prompt transparency or automated response-quality scoring

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.