QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
Start free
All templates

Guest Blog Contributor Experience Survey

Measures how guest bloggers and outside contributors experienced your pitching, editorial, and publishing process — from response times to backlink fairness. Built for content marketing and editorial teams that manage a guest-posting program. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific friction points behind low satisfaction or referral scores so you know exactly what to fix before your next contributor.

Use this templateBrowse more templates

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

13 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Hi! Thanks for contributing a guest post for us. We'd love to hear how the process felt from your side so we can make it smoother for future writers. This will take about 4-5 minutes.

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

How did you first connect with us about writing a guest post?

  • I pitched them directly
  • They invited/reached out to me
  • Found the opportunity through a search or directory
  • Referred by another writer or contact
  • Saw a call for contributors on social media
  • Other
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired

How easy was it to pitch your idea and get it approved?

Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q04
MatrixRequired

Rate the following parts of the editorial process:

4 rows × 5 columns
  • Speed of their response to your pitch
  • Clarity of their content/style guidelines
  • Quality and usefulness of editorial feedback
  • Turnaround time on edits before publishing
Columns: Poor · Fair · Good · Very Good · Excellent
Q05
Opinion ScaleRequired

How satisfied are you with how your post turned out once it was published?

Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all satisfiedMax:Extremely satisfied
Q06
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Did you receive the byline, author bio, and backlink you expected in exchange for your post?

  • Yes, fully as expected
  • Partially — something was missing or altered
  • No, I did not receive what was expected
  • Not applicable — I wasn't expecting attribution
Q07
Opinion ScaleRequired

How likely are you to recommend writing a guest post for this site to another writer you know?

Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q08
AI Interview

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's likelihood-to-recommend score and their satisfaction with the published result. If the score was low, identify the single most frustrating moment in the pitching, editing, or publishing process and what would have fixed it. If the score was high, find out which specific part of the experience (response speed, editorial feedback, attribution, communication) made the biggest positive difference, and whether any part still fell short despite the overall good experience.

Q09
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Based on this experience, would you write another guest post for us in the future?

  • Yes, definitely
  • Maybe, depending on the topic or terms
  • Unlikely
  • No
Q10
Long Text

If you could change one thing about our guest posting process, what would it be?

Q11
Multiple Choice

Which best describes you as a writer?

  • Independent blogger
  • Freelance writer
  • Industry expert/practitioner
  • Marketer/PR professional pitching on behalf of a brand
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice

How many years have you been writing content for publication (blogs, articles, etc.)?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Message

That's everything — thank you for taking the time to share your experience! Your feedback goes directly to our editorial team and will shape how we work with guest contributors going forward.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Goes beyond a one-time intake form by asking about the full experience — from first pitch outreach through post-publication satisfaction, byline/backlink delivery, and likelihood to recommend or write again
  • Includes a matrix question rating multiple parts of the editorial process side by side, so you can pinpoint exactly where friction occurred (pitching, editing, publishing, etc.)
  • An AI follow-up interview automatically probes the reasoning behind a low recommend or satisfaction score, surfacing the specific friction points you'd otherwise have to guess at
  • Captures writer segmentation (writer type, years of experience) and an open-ended 'one thing to change' question, giving editorial teams both quantifiable and qualitative fixes to act on

Jotform

Guest Blog Posting Form Template

This is a static intake form for collecting guest post submissions (pitch details, bio, content), not a post-experience satisfaction survey. It's fielding-ready as a submission form but doesn't measure how contributors felt about your editorial process afterward. Useful for the front-end of a guest-posting program rather than the feedback loop.

What it does well

  • Simple drag-and-drop form builder with quick setup
  • Likely offers a free tier for basic form collection
  • Familiar, widely-used form platform for content submission intake

Where it falls short

  • Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into why a contributor was dissatisfied
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated experience report
  • Focused on submission intake, not on measuring satisfaction, backlink fairness, or likelihood to refer

SurveySparrow

Guest Blog Posting Form

Another submission-style form template for guest post pitches, framed as a marketing template rather than a dedicated contributor-experience survey. It can collect basic pitch and bio information but isn't built to measure satisfaction with editorial turnaround, backlink delivery, or referral likelihood. Fielding-ready for intake, not for post-publication feedback.

What it does well

  • Conversational form format that may feel more approachable to contributors
  • Part of a broader survey/form platform with built-in analytics dashboards
  • Quick to deploy for capturing pitch submissions

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI interview to explore the reasoning behind low satisfaction or referral scores
  • No mention of voice AI interviews or screen-share guided tasks
  • Built for pitch intake rather than measuring the end-to-end contributor experience

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Use this templateStart free