Internal Process Time-Waste & Automation Opportunity Survey
Pinpoints which internal processes waste the most employee time, how often people route around official steps with workarounds, and which tasks are the best candidates for automation. Built for ops, IT, or PMO teams doing a process-improvement audit; the AI follow-up reconstructs the actual workaround steps behind the numbers so you know exactly what to fix first.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which of the following processes do you interact with at least monthly? (Template note: replace this list with your organization's actual core processes, e.g. expense reporting, ticket routing, onboarding, procurement approvals.)
- Expense reporting / reimbursement
- IT ticket submission
- Procurement / purchase approvals
- Employee onboarding paperwork
- Time tracking or timesheets
- Status reporting to management
- Vendor or contract approvals
- (Replace with process specific to your org)
Across the processes below, which wastes the MOST of your time and which wastes the LEAST? (Template note: swap in the 6-9 processes most relevant to your organization.)
- Expense reporting / reimbursement
- IT ticket submission
- Procurement / purchase approvals
- Employee onboarding paperwork
- Time tracking or timesheets
- Status reporting to management
- Vendor or contract approvals
In a typical week, how many hours do you estimate you spend on manual, repetitive, or duplicate work caused by these processes?
In the last 30 days, how often did you use an unofficial workaround (a spreadsheet, a side channel, a manual fix) instead of following the official process?
How often does each of the following happen to you at work?
- I redo work because a system or process failed the first time
- I wait on someone else's manual approval before I can proceed
- I re-enter the same data into more than one system
- I ask a colleague how to get around a slow official step
For which of these processes do you (or your team) regularly use a workaround instead of the documented steps? (Template note: mirror the process list used earlier.)
- Expense reporting / reimbursement
- IT ticket submission
- Procurement / purchase approvals
- Employee onboarding paperwork
- Time tracking or timesheets
- Status reporting to management
- Vendor or contract approvals
Briefly describe the workaround you use most often and why the official process didn't work for that situation.
Which single process would you most want automated or streamlined first?
- Expense reporting / reimbursement
- IT ticket submission
- Procurement / purchase approvals
- Employee onboarding paperwork
- Time tracking or timesheets
- Status reporting to management
- Vendor or contract approvals
How confident are you that automating this process would actually save meaningful time, without creating new problems?
Reconstruct the specific process the respondent flagged as the biggest time-waster or automation candidate: walk through the exact steps they take today, where the delay or duplication actually happens, and what tool or manual fix they lean on instead. If they mentioned a workaround, get concrete detail on how it's done and who else relies on it, since that reveals hidden risk. If they said they're not confident automation would help, probe what past attempt or system limitation makes them skeptical.
Almost done — just a couple of quick background questions to help us group the findings by team.
Which department or function do you primarily work in? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual department list.)
- Operations
- Finance
- IT / Engineering
- Sales
- Customer Support
- HR / People
- Marketing
- Prefer not to say
How long have you worked at the organization?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 2 years
- 2 to 5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into a process-improvement backlog we'll use to prioritize fixes and automation over the next planning cycle.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a dedicated MaxDiff question to force-rank which processes waste the most time, not just a generic satisfaction scale
- Pairs quantitative workaround-frequency questions (rating-scale, matrix) with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual workaround steps behind the numbers
- Closes with a open-text + AI interview combo specifically aimed at extracting 'why the official process doesn't work,' turning vague complaints into concrete process-fix candidates
- Ends in an auto-generated report designed for ops/IT/PMO teams to prioritize automation targets, not just a raw response export
Jotform
Process Improvement Survey Form TemplateA static, customizable form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's fielding-ready but relies on fixed question sets rather than any adaptive questioning. Good for basic feedback collection, not deep root-cause investigation.
What it does well
- Easy drag-and-drop customization
- Part of a large, mature form template library
- Simple to deploy quickly
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual answers
- No mechanism to reconstruct specific workaround steps behind a time-waste report
- No automated per-response quality scoring
SurveyMonkey
Tool And Process Improvement Survey TemplateA standard static survey template from an established survey platform, likely paired with SurveyMonkey's benchmarking and analytics features. It's ready to field but built around fixed-choice and scale questions rather than conversational follow-up.
What it does well
- Backed by a well-known, established survey platform
- Likely includes analytics/benchmarking dashboards
- Straightforward to launch at scale
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interviewing to dig into individual open-ended answers
- No voice AI interview option
- No transparent, published prompt methodology for how follow-ups would be generated
SurveySparrow
Process Improvement Survey TemplateA conversational-style form template with sample questions, good for a friendlier respondent experience. It's still a fixed, pre-scripted question flow rather than a dynamic AI-driven interview that adapts to each answer.
What it does well
- Conversational, chat-like UI for higher completion rates
- Includes sample questions to speed up setup
- Mobile-friendly presentation
Where it falls short
- Conversational styling is not the same as adaptive AI follow-up questioning
- No mechanism to reconstruct workaround steps behind a flagged answer
- No automated quality scoring of individual responses
Typeform
Process Improvement Survey TemplateA polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time template known for strong design and UX. It's a static template with predefined questions and branching logic, not a genuinely adaptive AI interview.
What it does well
- Strong visual design and respondent experience
- Simple logic-based branching between questions
- Widely used, familiar tool for internal surveys
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI or voice interview capability
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No built-in method to reconstruct the specific steps behind a reported workaround
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.